Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/12526
Authors: Zago, Vito* 
Bilotta, Giuseppe* 
Cappello, Annalisa* 
Dalrymple, Robert* 
Fortuna, Luigi* 
Ganci, Gaetana* 
Hérault, Alexis* 
Del Negro, Ciro* 
Title: Preliminary validation of lava benchmark tests on the GPUSPH particle engine
Journal: Annals of Geophysics 
Series/Report no.: /62 (2019)
Publisher: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Issue Date: 2019
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7870
Abstract: Lava flow modeling is important in many practical applications, such as the simulation of potential hazard scenarios and the planning of risk mitigation measures, as well as in scientific research to improve our understanding of the physical processes governing the dynamics of lava flow emplacement. Existing predictive models of lava flow behavior include various methods and solvers, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Codes differ in their physical implementations, numerical accuracy, and computational efficiency. In order to validate their efficiency and accuracy, several benchmark test cases for computational lava flow modeling have been established. Despite the popularity gained by the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), very few validations against lava flows have been successfully conducted. At the Tecnolab of INGVCatania we designed GPUSPH, an implementation of the weakly-compressible SPH method running fully on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). GPUSPH is a particle engine capable of modeling both Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, solving the three-dimensional Navier– Stokes equations, using either a fully explicit integration scheme, or a semi-implicit scheme in the case of highly viscous fluids. Thanks to the full coupling with the thermal equation, and its support for radiation, convection and phase transition, GPUSPH can be used to faithfully simulate lava flows. Here we present the preliminary results obtained with GPUSPH for a benchmark series for computational lava-flow modeling, including analytical, semi-analytical and experimental problems. The results are reported in terms of correctness and performance, highlighting the benefits and the drawbacks deriving from the use of SPH to simulate lava flows.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
7870-20398-1-PB.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

2
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

912
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

74
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric