Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/14342| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-25T07:55:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-25T07:55:03Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2122/14342 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The occurrence of a mainschok is always followed by aftershocks spatially distributed within the fault area. The aftershocks rate decay with time is described by the empirical Omori law which was inferred by catalogues analysis. The sequences discrimination within catalogues is not a straightforward operation, especially for low-magnitude mainshocks. Here, we describe the rate decay of the Omori law obtained using different sequence discrimination tools and we discover that, when the background seismicity is excluded, the sequences tend to last for the temporal extension of the catalogue. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
| dc.publisher.name | Springer International Publishing | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Pure and Applied Geophysics | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | /173(2016) | en_US |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
| dc.subject | Seismic Moment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Aftershock Sequence | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sequence Duration | en_US |
| dc.subject | Magnitude Class | en_US |
| dc.title | How Long is an Aftershock Sequence? | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en |
| dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
| dc.type.QualityControl | Peer-reviewed | en_US |
| dc.description.pagenumber | 2295–2304 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00024-016-1276-1 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | BAIESI M, PACZUSKI M (2004) Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks. Phys Rev E 69:066,106, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE. 69.066106 BOTTIGLIERI M, LIPPIELLO E, GODANO C, DE ARCANGELIS L (2009) Identification and spatiotemporal organization of aftershocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 114(B3):n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/2008JB005941 DIETERICH J (1994) A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 99(B2):2601–2618, doi:10. 1029/93JB02581 DIETERICH JH (1979) Modeling of rock friction: 1. experimental results and constitutive equations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 84(B5):2161–2168, doi:10.1029/ JB084iB05p02161 FELZER KR, BRODSKY EE (2006) Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress. Nature 441:735–738 HELMSTETTER A (2003) Is earthquake triggering driven by small earthquakes? Phys Rev Lett 91:058,501, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.91.058501 HELMSTETTER A, KAGAN YY, JACKSON DD (2005) Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 110(B5):n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/2004JB003286 KAGAN YY (2004) Short-term properties of earthquake catalogs and models of earthquake source. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(4):1207–1228 KNOPOFF L, GARDNER JK (1972) Higher seismic activity during local night on the raw worldwide earthquake catalogue. Geophysical Journal International 28(3):311–313, doi:10.1111/j. 1365-246X.1972.tb06133.x, URL http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/ content/28/3/311.short, http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/ 3/311.full?html LIPPIELLO E., GODANO C. and DE ARCANGELIS L. (2007) Dynamical Scaling in Branching Models for Seismicity. Phys. Rev. Let. 98 LIPPIELLO E, BOTTIGLIERI M, GODANO C, DE ARCANGELIS L (2007) Dynamical scaling and generalized omori law. Geophysical Research Letters 34(23), doi:10.1029/2007GL030963 LIPPIELLO, E. and DE ARCANGELIS, L. and GODANO, C. (2008) Influence of Time and Space Correlations on Earthquake Magnitude. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(3):038501–038504 LIPPIELLO, E. and GODANO, C. and DE ARCANGELIS, L. (2012) The earthquake magnitude is influenced by previous seismicity. Geophysical Research Letters 39(5) LIPPIELLO E, MARZOCCHI W, DE ARCANGELIS L, GODANO C (2012) Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool to forecast large earthquakes. Sci Rep 2, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ srep00846 MARSAN D, LENGLIN O (2008) Extending earthquakes’ reach through cascading. Science 319(5866):1076–1079, doi:10.1126/ science.1148783, URL http://www.sciencemag.org/content/319/ 5866/1076.abstract, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/319/ 5866/1076.full MOLCHAN GM, DMITRIEVA OE (1992) Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches. Geophysical Journal International 109(3):501–516, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb00113.x, URL http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/3/501.abstract, http:// gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/3/501.full?html OMORI F (1894) On the after-shocks of earthquakes. J Coll Sci Imp Univ Tokyo 7:111–200 REASENBERG P (1985) Second-order moment of central california seismicity, 19691982. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 90(B7):5479–5495, doi:10.1029/JB090iB07p05479 REASENBERG PA, JONES LM (1989) Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in california. Science 243(4895):1173–1176, doi:10. 1126/science.243.4895.1173, URL http://www.sciencemag.org/ content/243/4895/1173.abstract, http://www.sciencemag.org/ content/243/4895/1173.full REASENBERG PA, JONES LM (1994) Earthquake aftershocks: Update. Science 265(5176):1251–1252, doi:10.1126/science. 265.5176.1251, URL http://www.sciencemag.org/content/265/ 5176/1251.short, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/265/5176/ 1251.full SCHAFF DP, BEROZA GC, SHAW BE (1998) Postseismic response of repeating aftershocks. Geophysical Research Letters 25(24):4549–4552, doi:10.1029/1998GL900192 SHAW BE (1993) Generalized omori law for aftershocks and foreshocks from a simple dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters 20(10):907–910, doi:10.1029/93GL01058 SHCHERBAKOV R, TURCOTTE DL, RUNDLE JB (2004) A generalized omori’s law for earthquake aftershock decay. Geophysical Research Letters 31(11):n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/2004GL019808 Vol. 173, (2016) How Long is an Aftershocks Sequence? 2303 SHEARER P, HAUKSSON E, LIN G (2005) Southern california hypocenter relocation with waveform cross-correlation, part 2: Results using source-specific station terms and cluster analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(3):904–915, doi:10.1785/0120040168, URL http://www.bssaonline.org/ content/95/3/904.abstract, http://www.bssaonline.org/content/95/ 3/904.full?html UTSU T, SEKI A (1954) A relation between the area of aftershock region and the energy of mainshock. J Seismol Soc Jpn 7:233 240 UTSU T, OGATA Y, S R, MATSU’URA (1995) The centenary of the omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity. Journal of Physics of the Earth 43(1):1–33, doi:10.4294/jpe1952.43.1 WALDHAUSER F, SCHAFF DP (2008) Large-scale relocation of two decades of northern california seismicity using cross-correlation and double-difference methods. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 113(B8):n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/ 2007JB005479 WIEMER S, KATSUMATA K (1999) Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 104(B6):13,135–13,151, doi:10.1029/ 1999JB900032 ZIV A (2006) Does aftershock duration scale with mainshock size? Geophysical Research Letters 33(17):n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/ 2006GL027141 ZIV A, RUBIN AM (2003) Implications of rate-and-state friction forproperties of aftershock sequence: Quasi-static inherently discrete simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth108(B1):n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/2001JB001219 | en_US |
| dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico | 6T. Studi di pericolosità sismica e da maremoto | en_US |
| dc.description.journalType | JCR Journal | en_US |
| dc.relation.issn | 0033-4553 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Godano, Cataldo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tramelli, Anna | - |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Mathematics and Physics, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OV, Napoli, Italia | en_US |
| item.openairetype | article | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
| item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| crisitem.author.dept | Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli | - |
| crisitem.author.dept | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OV, Napoli, Italia | - |
| crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-9455-4789 | - |
| crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-6259-5730 | - |
| crisitem.author.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
| crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Article published / in press | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | Existing users please Login |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Godano-Tramelli2016_Article_HowLongIsAnAftershockSequence.pdf | 731.85 kB | Adobe PDF |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Feb 10, 2021
Page view(s)
106
checked on Apr 24, 2024
Download(s)
1
checked on Apr 24, 2024
