Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/13816
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-21T05:35:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-21T05:35:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-16-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/13816-
dc.description.abstractAlgorithms based on Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Iterative Filtering (IF) are largely implemented for representing a signal as superposition of simpler well-behaved components called Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs). Although they are more suitable than traditional methods for the analysis of nonlinear and nonstationary signals, they could be easily misused if their known limitations, together with the assumptions they rely on, are not carefully considered. In this work, we examine the main pitfalls and provide caveats for the proper use of the EMD- and IF-based algorithms. Specifically, we address the problems related to boundary errors, to the presence of spikes or jumps in the signal and to the decomposition of highly-stochastic signals. The consequences of an improper usage of these techniques are discussed and clarified also by analysing real data and performing numerical simulations. Finally, we provide the reader with the best practices to maximize the quality and meaningfulness of the decomposition produced by these techniques. In particular, a technique for the extension of signal to reduce the boundary effects is proposed; a careful handling of spikes and jumps in the signal is suggested; the concept of multi-scale statistical analysis is presented to treat highly stochastic signals.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.nameNature P.G.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries/10 (2020)en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleNew insights and best practices for the successful use of Empirical Mode Decomposition, Iterative Filtering and derived algorithmsen_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.pagenumber15161en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-020-72193-2en_US
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico5T. Sismologia, geofisica e geologia per l'ingegneria sismicaen_US
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen_US
dc.contributor.authorStallone, Angela-
dc.contributor.authorCicone, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorMaterassi, Massimo-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali dell’Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisicaen_US
dc.contributor.departmenttaly. 3Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ISC-CNR)en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto dei Sistemi Complessi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8141-017X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8107-9624-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
SR_2020_Stallone_Cicone_Materassi.pdf3.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

151
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Download(s)

19
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric