Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/13368
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T13:05:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-03T13:05:08Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/13368-
dc.description.abstractThe 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 earthquake caused damage typical of intensity VI on the European Macroseismic Scale to the city of Palermo, 40–50 km southwest of the epicenter. In distinct contrast with the ground accelerations expected for that intensity (30–60 Gal, approximately), the analog accelerographs around Pa- lermo and in the northern coast of Sicily were not triggered, indicating a level of shaking lower than the 10-Gal threshold, at least on the vertical component. To shed light on the apparent contradiction, we estimated ground accelerations of the main- shock in Palermo by using the aftershock seismograms recorded at eight broadband stations in the city on different geological formations. Rock stations in the region were used to compute seismic moment, local magnitude, corner frequency, and stress drop for the events of the sequence. The observed ground motions of mainshock and aftershocks result in a substantially constant (100 bars) stress drop scaling over the seismic-moment interval 1019 M0 1025 dyne cm. To assess the mainshock ground motion in Palermo, we applied this source scaling law to the aftershock seismograms in the city by using three different techniques: random series generation, random summation of empirical Green’s functions, and amplitude scaling through spectral ratios between stations. For each of the stations that recorded aftershocks in Palermo, the three methods yield consistent results. Simulated horizontal accelerations of the mainshock vary from 14 Ⳳ 2 Gal on the stiffest formation (Oligo-Miocene Numidian Flysch) up to 51 Ⳳ 14 Gal on Holocene sea and lacustrine soft deposits. Accelera- tions assessed for the vertical component show a smaller variation, ranging from 11 Ⳳ 4 to 21 Ⳳ 4 Gal, respectively. The minimum average value of the vertical components and the maximum of the horizontal components agree fairly well with the threshold of not triggered accelerographs and ground accelerations statistically corresponding to the maximum felt intensity, respectively. This study indicates that, during the 6 September 2002 earthquake, a large (a factor of 3–4) variability of horizontal ground motion did really occur in Palermo as an effect of local geology.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of the Seismological Society of Americaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries6/95 (2005)en_US
dc.titleAssessment of Ground Motion in Palermo, Italy, during the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 Earthquake Using Source Scaling Lawen_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.description.pagenumber2342–2363en_US
dc.subject.INGV04.06. Seismologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120050063en_US
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3T. Sorgente sismicaen_US
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen_US
dc.contributor.authorCalderoni, Giovanna-
dc.contributor.authorRovelli, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorCultrera, Giovanna-
dc.contributor.authorAzzara, Riccardo Mario-
dc.contributor.authorDi Giulio, Giuseppe-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3712-4432-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3335-5655-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0345-9568-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4097-7102-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
ArticoloPubblicato_BSSA.PDFArticle508.01 kBAdobe PDF
ERRATUM_Articolo.pdfErratum29.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

210
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Download(s)

12
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric