Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/12470
Authors: Parsons, Tom* 
Geist, Eric L.* 
Console, Rodolfo* 
Carluccio, Roberto* 
Title: Characteristic Earthquake Magnitude Frequency Distributions on Faults Calculated From Consensus Data in California
Journal: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 
Series/Report no.: 12/123(2018)
Issue Date: 2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016539
Abstract: An estimate of the expected earthquake rate at all possible magnitudes is needed for seismic hazard forecasts. Regional earthquake magnitude frequency distributions obey a negative exponential law (Gutenberg-Richter), but it is unclear if individual faults do. We add three new methods to calculate long-term California earthquake rupture rates to the existing Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast version 3 efforts to assess method and parameter dependence on magnitude frequency results for individual faults. All solutions show strongly characteristic magnitude-frequency distributions on the San Andreas and other faults, with higher rates of large earthquakes than would be expected from a Gutenberg-Richter distribution. This is a necessary outcome that results from fitting high fault slip rates under the overall statewide earthquake rate budget. We find that input data choices can affect the nucleation magnitude-frequency distribution shape for the San Andreas Fault; solutions are closer to a Gutenberg-Richter distribution if the maximum magnitude allowed for earthquakes that occur away from mapped faults (background events) is raised above the consensus threshold of M = 7.6, if the moment rate for background events is reduced, or if the overall maximum magnitude is reduced from M = 8.5. We also find that participation magnitudefrequency distribution shapes can be strongly affected by slip rate discontinuities along faults that may be artifacts related to segment boundaries.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

7
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

168
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

85
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric