Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4409
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallPessina, V.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallScandella, L.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallFranceschina, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallLai, C.G.; Eucentre Paviaen
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-02T10:50:46Zen
dc.date.available2008-12-02T10:50:46Zen
dc.date.issued2008-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/4409en
dc.description.abstractA National research project was recently carried out to develop a robust methodology for the design and retrofit of wharves structures located in areas of high to moderate seismicity. A detailed census of the Italian major seaports was performed using purposely devised questionnaires and Ancona harbor was chosen for a detailed investigation with the aim of providing risk assessment guidelines. This port has been selected as representative of a moderate seismicity area (expected peak ground acceleration of 0.25 g with a return period of 475 yrs). Ancona is the first harbor in the Adriatic sea, with more than a 1.500.000 passenger service and 150.000 trucks transit. It is equipped with 30 wharfs, 25 of which built in 1965-1975. To compute deterministic ground shaking scenarios, predictive empirical models have been used. At the same time advanced numerical simulation have been carried out both at high (0.7-30 Hz) and low (0-1.3) frequency ranges. The contributions of site effects and liquefaction have been also taken into account in damage estimation. Standard risk assessment has been performed using the empirical curves implemented in HAZUS program (NIBS, 2004), supported by recent studies (Lessloss, 2006, Del. 89) on damage observed after the 2003 event in Lefkas (Greece).en
dc.description.sponsorshipChina Earthquake Administratio; Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, China; International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE); Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE)en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartof14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (14 WCEE)en
dc.subjectdeterministic ground shaking scenarioen
dc.subjectnumerical simulationsen
dc.subjectseaport damageen
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten
dc.titleSeismic risk assessment of italian seaports: the case of Ancona (Italy)en
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.description.ConferenceLocationBeijing, Chinaen
dc.relation.referencesAkkar S., Bommer J.J. (2007). Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived da strong-motion records da Europe and the Middle East. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 97:2, 511-530. Ambraseys N. N., Douglas J., Sarma S. K., Smit P. M. (2005a). Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions da shallow crustal earthquakes using data da Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 3:1, 1-53. Ambraseys N. N., Douglas J., Sarma S. K., Smit P. M. (2005b). Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions da shallow crustal earthquakes using data da Europe and the Middle East: vertical peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 3:1, 55-73. Ambraseys N.N. & Douglas J. (2003). Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 23:1, 1-18. Basili R., Burrato P., Mariano S., Mirabella F., Ravaglia A., Valensise G., Vannoli P. (2007). Identification and characterization of seismogenetic sources for seismic hazard scenarios along the Marche coastline (in Italian). Mucciarelli M.,Tiberi P. (eds.), Tecnoprint srl Ancona, 3-70. Bernard P., Madariaga R. (1984). A new asymptotic method for the modeling of near field accelerograms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74:2, 539-557. Boore D.M. (2003). Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 635-676. Cauzzi C., Faccioli, E. (2008). Broadband (0.05 a 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol. 3, DOI 10.1007/s10950-008-9098-y. Del Pezzo E., Rovelli A., Zonno G. (1985). Seismic Q and site effects on seismograms of local earthquakes in the Ancona region (central Italy). Annales Geophysicae 3:5, 629-636. EUCENTRE-PE5 (2008). Progettazione Sismica di Strutture Portuali Marittime. Research Report, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering. July 2008, pp. 201 (in Italian). Hisada Y., Bielak J. (2003). A theoretical method for computing near fault ground motion in a layered half-spaces considering static offset due to surface faulting, with a physical interpretation of fling step and rupture directivity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93:3, 1154-1168. Ichii K. (2004). Fragility curves for gravity-type quay walls based on effective stress analysis. Proc. 13th WCEE, Vancouver, BC Canada. Juang C.H., Yuan H., Lee D.H., Lin P.S. (2003). Simplified Cone Penetration Test-based method for Evaluating Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Eng. ASCE 129:1, 66-80. Kakderi K., Raptakis D., Argyroudis S., Alexoudi M., Pitilakis K. (2006). Seismic Response and Vulnerability Assessment of Quaywalls. The Case of Lefkas. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, Xanthi, Greece (in Greek). Lessloss (2006). Deliverable 89 - Technical report on the assessment of vulnerability functions for pipelines, shallow tunnels and waterfront structures. Sub-Project 11 – Earthquake disaster scenario predictions and loss modelling for infrastructures. Lessloss Project - Risk mitigation for earthquake and landslides integrated project - Project No.: GOCE-CT-2003-505488. Monge O., Alexoudi M., Argyroudis S., Martin C., Pitilakis K. (2004). Vulnerability assessment of lifelines and essential facilities (WP06): basic methodological handbook. Risk_UE An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different european towns, Research Project, European commission, DG XII2001-2004, CEC Contract number EVK4-CT-2000-00014. NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences) (2004). Earthquake loss estimation methodology, HAZUS. Thecnical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. Pachakis D. & Kiremidjian A.S. (2004). Estimation of Downtime-related revenue losses in seaport following scenario earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 20:2, 427-449. Pacor, F., Cultrera, G., Mendez, A. , Cocco, M. (2005). Finite Fault Modeling of Strong Ground Motion Using a Hybrid Deterministic - Stochastic Method. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95:1, 225-240. Pitilakis K., Alexoudi A., Argyroudis S., Monge O., and Martin C. (2006). Chapter 9: Vulnerability assessment of lifelines. in C.S. Oliveira, A. Roca and X. Goula ed. “Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk. Geo-Scientific and Engineering Knowledge for Earthquake Risk mitigation: Developments, Aols and Techniques,” Springer Publ. Roth W.H., & Dawson E.M. (2003). Analysing the seismic performance of wharves, part 2: SSI analysis with non-linear, effective-stress soil models. Proceedings of the 6th U.S. Conference and Workshop of lifeline Earthquake Engineering TCLEE, Monograph No. 25, August. Sabetta F. & Pugliese A. (1996). Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86:2, 337–352. Spudich P., Frazer N.L. (1984). Use of ray theory to calculate high-frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially variable rupture velocity and stress drop. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74:6, 2061-2082. Tromans I.J., Bommer J.J. (2002). The attenuation of strong-motion peaks in Europe. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, Monograph No. 394. Zhang G., Robertson P.K., Brachman R. W. I. (2002). Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground. Can. Geotech. J. 39, 1168-1180, DOI: 10.1139/T02-047.en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.2. TTC - Scenari e mappe di pericolosità sismicaen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorPessina, V.en
dc.contributor.authorScandella, L.en
dc.contributor.authorFranceschina, G.en
dc.contributor.authorLai, C.G.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentEucentre Paviaen
item.openairetypeConference paper-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptEucentre Pavia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3772-7030-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0990-4279-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Conference materials
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
14WCEE_S03-022.pdfConference paper785.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

192
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 5

857
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check