Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Article published / in press
  5. Source modelling of the M5-6 Emilia-Romagna, Italy, earthquakes (May 20-29, 2012)
 
  • Details

Source modelling of the M5-6 Emilia-Romagna, Italy, earthquakes (May 20-29, 2012)

Author(s)
Cesca, S.  
GFZ-Potsdam  
Braun, T.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia  
Maccaferri, F.  
GFZ-Potsdam  
Passarelli, L.  
GFZ-Potsdam  
Rivalta, E.  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
4T. Fisica dei terremoti e scenari cosismici
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Journal
Geophysical Journal International  
Issue/vol(year)
/193(2013)
ISSN
0956-540X
Electronic ISSN
1365-246X
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Pages (printed)
1658-1672
Date Issued
March 28, 2013
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggt069
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/9482
Subjects
04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.03. Earthquake source and dynamics  
Subjects

Earthquake dynamics

Earthquake source obs...

Abstract
On 2012 May 20 and 29, two damaging earthquakes with magnitudes Mw 6.1 and 5.9, respectively, struck the Emilia-Romagna region in the sedimentary Po Plain, Northern Italy, causing 26 fatalities, significant damage to historical buildings and substantial impact to the economy of the region. The earthquake sequence included four more aftershocks with Mw ? 5.0, all at shallow depths (about 7–9 km), with similar WNW–ESE striking reverse mechanism. The timeline of the sequence suggests significant static stress interaction between the largest events. We perform here a detailed source inversion, first adopting a point source approximation and considering pure double couple and full moment tensor source models. We compare different extended source inversion approaches for the two largest events, and find that the rupture occurred in both cases along a subhorizontal plane, dipping towards SSW. Directivity is well detected for the May 20 main shock, indicating that the rupture propagated unilaterally towards SE. Based on the focal mechanism solution, we further estimate the co-seismic static stress change induced by the May 20 event. By using the rate-and-state model and a Poissonian earthquake occurrence, we infer that the second largest event of May 29 was induced with a probability in the range 0.2–0.4. This suggests that the segment of fault was already prone to rupture. Finally, we estimate peak ground accelerations for the two main events as occurred separately or simultaneously. For the scenario involving hypothetical rupture areas of both main events, we estimate Mw = 6.3 and an increase of ground acceleration by 50 per cent. The approach we propose may help to quantify rapidly which regions are invested by a significant increase of the hazard, bearing the potential for large aftershocks or even a second main shock.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Geophys. J. Int.-2013-Cesca-gji_ggt069.pdf

Size

1.67 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

43e9e9a3ee0d23ce8fe1fb3075b455b8

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback