Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9363
Authors: Aloisi, M.* 
Bruno, V.* 
Cannavò, F.* 
Ferranti, L.* 
Mattia, M.* 
Monaco, C.* 
Title: Reply to ‘Comments on the paper “Are the source models of the M 7.1 1908 Messina Straits earthquake reliable? Insights from a novel inversion and sensitivity analysis of levelling data” by Aloisi et al. (2012)’
Journal: Geophysical Journal International 
Series/Report no.: /197 (2014)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Issue Date: 2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu116
URL: http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/197/3/1403.full.pdf+html?sid=5c185887-c318-42a2-accb-403c4cbcc4fa
Keywords: Transient deformation
Earthquake dynamics
Earthquake source observations
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.03. Geodesy::04.03.01. Crustal deformations 
04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.01. Earthquake faults: properties and evolution 
04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.03. Earthquake source and dynamics 
04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motion 
Abstract: We reply to the comments of De Natale and Pino (2013) on the paper “Are the source models of the M 7.1 1908 Messina Straits earthquake reliable? Insights from a novel inversion and sensitivity analysis of levelling data” by Aloisi et al. (2012). We entirely reject their speculative comments and confirm our viewpoint about the impossibility of discriminating between the two oppositely dipping fault models on the basis of the levelling data alone; we state again that their role as a keystone for modellers is untenable. The comment of De Natale and Pino (2013) are welcomed insofar they give us the possibility to improve our previous analysis, and to criticize the mainstream hypothesis favoring to a low-angle East dipping fault in the Sicilian side of the Messina Straits as responsible of the 1908 destructive earthquake.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Aloisi et al., 2014_reply.pdfMain article5.09 MBAdobe PDF
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

532
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

33
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric