Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/15173
Authors: Lanzano, Giovanni* 
Sgobba, Sara* 
Caramenti, Luca* 
Menafoglio, Alessandra* 
Title: Ground-Motion Model for Crustal Events in Italy by Applying the Multisource Geographically Weighted Regression (MS-GWR) Method
Journal: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 
Series/Report no.: 6/111 (2021)
Publisher: SSA
Issue Date: 2021
DOI: 10.1785/0120210044
Abstract: In this article, we implement a new approach to calibrate ground‐motion models (GMMs) characterized by spatially varying coefficients, using the calibration dataset of an existing GMM for crustal events in Italy. The model is developed in the methodological framework of the multisource geographically weighted regression (MS‐GWR, Caramenti et al., 2020), which extends the theory of multiple linear regression to the case with model coefficients that are spatially varying, thus allowing for capturing the multiple sources of nonstationarity in ground motion related to event and station locations. In this way, we reach the aim of regionalizing the ground motion in Italy by specializing the model in a nonergodic framework. Such an attempt at regionalization also addresses the purpose of capturing the regional effects in the modeling, which is needed for the Italian country, where ground‐motion properties vary significantly across space. Because the proposed model relies on the italian GMM (ITA18) (Lanzano et al., 2019) dataset and functional form, it could be considered the ITA18 nonstationary version, thus allowing one to predict peak ground acceleration and velocity, as well as 36 ordinates of the 5%‐damped acceleration response spectra in the period interval T=0.01–10s⁠. The resulting MS‐GWR model shows an improved ability to predict the ground motion locally, compared with stationary ITA18, leading to a significant reduction of the total variability at all periods of about 15%–20%. The article also provides scenario‐dependent uncertainties associated with the median predictions to be used as a part of the epistemic uncertainty in the context of probabilistic seismic hazard analyses. Results show that the approach is promising for improving the model predictions, especially on densely sampled areas, although further studies are necessary to resolve the observed trade‐off inherent to site and path effects, which limits their physical interpretation.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Lanzano_et_al_2021_BSSA.pdfRestricted Paper5.49 MBAdobe PDF
BSSA-D-21-00044_R3.pdfOpen Access accepted article (emb aug-22)7.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

282
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Download(s)

31
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric