Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Authors: Newell, D. B.* 
van Ditmarsch, Dave* 
Francis, O.* 
Kanney, J.* 
Liard, J.* 
Ramirez, A. E.* 
Lucero, B.* 
Ellis, B.* 
Greco, Filippo* 
Pistorio, Antonio* 
Reudink, R.* 
Iacovone, D.* 
Baccaro, F.* 
Silliker, J.* 
Wheeler, R. D.* 
Falk, R.* 
Ruelke, A.* 
Title: Regional comparison of absolute gravimeters SIM.M.G-K1 key comparison
Issue Date: Jan-2017
Series/Report no.: /54 (2017)
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/07019
Abstract: Twelve absolute gravimeters were compared during the regional Key Comparison SIM.M.G-K1 of absolute gravimeters. The four gravimeters were from different NMIs and DIs. The comparison was linked to the CCM.G-K2 through EURAMET.M.G-K2 via the DI gravimeter FG5X-216. Overall, the results and uncertainties indicate an excellent agreement among the gravimeters, with a standard deviation of the gravimeters' DoEs better than 1.3 μGal. In the case of the official solution, all the gravimeters are in equivalence well within the declared uncertainties. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AS5710841828311041513168487329_content_1.pdffull text1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Nov 18, 2018


checked on Nov 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM