Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10712
Authors: Gasperini, Paolo* 
Lolli, Barbara* 
Castellaro, Silvia* 
Title: Reply to “Comment on ‘Unbiased Estimation of Moment Magnitude from Body‐ and Surface‐Wave Magnitudes’ by R. Das, H. R. Wason, and M. L. Sharma and ‘Comparative Analysis of Regression Methods Used for Seismic Magnitudes Conversions’ by P. Gasperini, B. Lolli, and S. Castellaro” by J. Pujol
Issue Date: Feb-2018
Series/Report no.: /108 (2018)
DOI: 10.1785/0120160341
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10712
Keywords: earthquake magnitude
magnitude regression methods
seismic magnitudes conversions
Subject Classificationreply to comment
Abstract: We suspect that most criticisms by Pujol (2017, hereafter, P17) were originated by a misunderstanding of our article (Gasperini et al., 2015) that the author himself frankly admits (“Some of the arguments made in the paper were not completely clear to the present author” p. 11) and maybe even by a misunderstanding of the textbook of Fuller (1987). In the following, we will discuss in general the main P17 criticisms, whereas detailed answers to all of them are reported in the Appendix.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
23_Gasperini_Lolli_Castellaro_2018_BSSA.pdfMain paper148.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jul 16, 2018

Download(s)

3
checked on Jul 16, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric