The 2022 Seismic Sequence in the Northern Adriatic Sea and Its Long-Term Simulation
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
2T. Deformazione crostale attiva
4T. Sismicità dell'Italia
6T. Studi di pericolosità sismica e da maremoto
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Issue/vol(year)
/13 (2023)
ISSN
2076-3417
Publisher
MDPI
Pages (printed)
3746
Date Issued
March 15, 2023
Alternative Location
Subjects
Abstract
We studied the long-term features of earthquakes caused by a fault system in the northern
Adriatic sea that experienced a series of quakes beginning with two main shocks of magnitude
5.5 and 5.2 on 9 November 2022 at 06:07 and 06:08 UTC, respectively. This offshore fault system,
identified through seismic reflection profiles, has a low slip rate of 0.2–0.5 mm/yr. As the historical
record spanning a millennium does not extend beyond the inter-event time for the largest expected
earthquakes (M ' 6.5), we used an earthquake simulator to generate a 100,000-year catalogue with
121 events of Mw 5.5. The simulation results showed a recurrence time (Tr) increasing from 800 yrs
to 1700 yrs as the magnitude threshold increased from 5.5 to 6.5. However, the standard deviation
s of inter-event times remained at a stable value of 700 yrs regardless of the magnitude threshold.
This means that the coefficient of variation (Cv = s/Tr) decreased from 0.9 to 0.4 as the threshold
magnitude increased from 5.5 to 6.5, making earthquakes more predictable over time for larger
magnitudes. Our study supports the use of a renewal model for seismic hazard assessment in regions
of moderate seismicity, especially when historical catalogues are not available.
Adriatic sea that experienced a series of quakes beginning with two main shocks of magnitude
5.5 and 5.2 on 9 November 2022 at 06:07 and 06:08 UTC, respectively. This offshore fault system,
identified through seismic reflection profiles, has a low slip rate of 0.2–0.5 mm/yr. As the historical
record spanning a millennium does not extend beyond the inter-event time for the largest expected
earthquakes (M ' 6.5), we used an earthquake simulator to generate a 100,000-year catalogue with
121 events of Mw 5.5. The simulation results showed a recurrence time (Tr) increasing from 800 yrs
to 1700 yrs as the magnitude threshold increased from 5.5 to 6.5. However, the standard deviation
s of inter-event times remained at a stable value of 700 yrs regardless of the magnitude threshold.
This means that the coefficient of variation (Cv = s/Tr) decreased from 0.9 to 0.4 as the threshold
magnitude increased from 5.5 to 6.5, making earthquakes more predictable over time for larger
magnitudes. Our study supports the use of a renewal model for seismic hazard assessment in regions
of moderate seismicity, especially when historical catalogues are not available.
References
1. ISIDe_Working_Group. Italian Seismological Instrumental and Parametric Database (ISIDe); Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e
Vulcanologia: Roma, Italy, 2007. [CrossRef]
2. Tertulliani, A.; Antonucci, A.; Berardi, M.; Borghi, A.; Brunelli, G.; Caracciolo, C.H.; Castellano, C.; D’Amico, V.; Del Mese, S.;
Ercolani, E.; et al. Gruppo Operativo Quest Rilievo Macrosismico MW 5.5 Costa Marchigiana del 9/11/2022 Rapporto Finale del
15/11/2022. Available online: https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/15794 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
3. Schultz, K.W.; Sachs, M.K.; Yoder, M.R.; Rundle, J.B.; Turcotte, D.L.; Heien, E.M.; Donnellan, A. Virtual quake: Statistics,
co-seismic deformations and gravity changes for driven earthquake fault systems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium
on Geodesy for Earthquake and Natural Hazards (GENAH), Matsushima, Japan, 22–26 July 2014; Springer: Cham, Switzerland,
2017; pp. 29–37.
4. Christophersen, A.; Rhoades, D.; Colella, H. Precursory seismicity in regions of low strain rate: Insights from a physics-based
earthquake simulator. Geophys. J. Int. 2017, 209, 1513–1525. [CrossRef]
5. Field, E.H. How physics-based earthquake simulators might help improve earthquake forecasts. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2019,
90, 467–472. [CrossRef]
6. Console, R.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R. Physics-Based Simulation of Sequences with Foreshocks, Aftershocks and Multiple Main
Shocks in Italy. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2062. [CrossRef]
7. Console, R.; Murru, M.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R.; Taroni, M.; Falcone, G. Physics-based simulation of sequences with multiple
main shocks in Central Italy. Geophys. J. Int. 2020, 223, 526–542. [CrossRef]
8. Console, R.; Carluccio, R.; Papadimitriou, E.; Karakostas, V. Synthetic earthquake catalogs simulating seismic activity in the
Corinth Gulf, Greece, fault system. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2015, 120, 326–343. [CrossRef]
9. Console, R.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R. The seismicity of the Central Apennines (Italy) studied by means of a physics-based
earthquake simulator. Geophys. J. Int. 2018, 212, 916–929. [CrossRef]
10. Parsons, T.; Geist, E.L.; Console, R.; Carluccio, R. Characteristic earthquake magnitude frequency distributions on faults calculated
from consensus data in California. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2018, 123, 10–761. [CrossRef]
11. Gulia, L.;Wiemer, S. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks. Nature 2019, 574, 193–199. [CrossRef]
12. DISS_Working_Group. Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), Version 3.3.0: A Compilation of Potential Sources for
Earthquakes Larger Than M 5.5 in Italy and Surrounding Areas; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia: Roma, Italy, 2021.
Available online: http://diss.rm.ingv.it/diss/ (accessed on 14 February 2023). [CrossRef]
13. Vannoli, P.; Basili, R.; Valensise, G. New geomorphic evidence for anticlinal growth driven by blind-thrust faulting along the
northern Marche coastal belt (central Italy). J. Seismol. 2004, 8, 297–312. [CrossRef]
14. Fantoni, R.; Franciosi, R. Tectono-sedimentary setting of the Po Plain and Adriatic foreland. Rend. Lincei 2010, 21, 197–209.
[CrossRef]
15. Kastelic, V.; Vannoli, P.; Burrato, P.; Fracassi, U.; Tiberti, M.M.; Valensise, G. Seismogenic sources in the Adriatic Domain. Mar.
Pet. Geol. 2013, 42, 191–213. [CrossRef]
16. Elter, P.; Giglia, G.; Tongiorgi, M.; Trevisan, L. Tensional and Compressional Areas in the Recent (Tortonian to Present) Evolution
of the Northern Apennines. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 1975, 17, 3–18.
17. Maesano, F.E.; Toscani, G.; Burrato, P.; Mirabella, F.; D’Ambrogi, C.; Basili, R. Deriving thrust fault slip rates from geological
modeling: Examples from the Marche coastal and offshore contraction belt, Northern Apennines, Italy. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2013,
42, 122–134. [CrossRef]
18. Rovida, A.N.; Locati, M.; Camassi, R.D.; Lolli, B.; Gasperini, P.; Antonucci, A. Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani CPTI15,
Versione 4.0; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Roma, Italy, 2022. [CrossRef]
19. Vannoli, P.; Vannucci, G.; Bernardi, F.; Palombo, B.; Ferrari, G. The source of the 30 October 1930 M w 5.8 Senigallia (Central
Italy) earthquake: A convergent solution from instrumental, macroseismic, and geological data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2015,
105, 1548–1561. [CrossRef]
20. Vannoli, P.; Bernardi, F.; Palombo, B.; Vannucci, G.; Console, R.; Ferrari, G. New constraints shed light on strike-slip faulting
beneath the southern Apennines (Italy): The 21 August 1962 Irpinia multiple earthquake. Tectonophysics 2016, 691, 375–384.
[CrossRef]
21. Guidoboni, E.; Ferrari, G.; Mariotti, D.; Comastri, A.; Tarabusi, G.; Sgattoni, G.; Valensise, G. CFTI5Med, Catalogo dei Forti Terremoti
in Italia (461 aC-1997) e nell’area Mediterranea (760 aC-1500); Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy,
2018. [CrossRef]
22. Maramai, A.; Graziani, L.; Brizuela, B. Euro-Mediterranean Tsunami Catalogue (EMTC), Version 2.0; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e
Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy, 2019. [CrossRef]
23. Leonard, M. Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations: Update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults. Bull.
Seismol. Soc. Am. 2014, 104, 2953–2965. [CrossRef]
24. Console, R.; Carluccio, R. Earthquake Simulators Development and Application. In Statistical Methods and Modeling of Seismogenesis;
Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2021; p. 27.
25. Console, R.; Carluccio, R.; Murru, M.; Papadimitriou, E.; Karakostas, V. Physics-Based Simulation of Spatiotemporal Patterns of
Earthquakes in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, Fault System. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2022, 112, 98–117. [CrossRef]
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3746 11 of 11
26. Rundle, J.B.; Turcotte, D.; Donnellan, A.; Grant Ludwig, L.; Luginbuhl, M.; Gong, G. Nowcasting earthquakes. Earth Space Sci.
2016, 3, 480–486. [CrossRef]
27. Rundle, J.B.; Stein, S.; Donnellan, A.; Turcotte, D.L.; Klein, W.; Saylor, C. The complex dynamics of earthquake fault systems:
New approaches to forecasting and nowcasting of earthquakes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 076801. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Varotsos, P.K.; Perez-Oregon, J.; Skordas, E.S.; Sarlis, N.V. Estimating the epicenter of an impending strong earthquake by
combining the seismicity order parameter variability analysis with earthquake networks and nowcasting: Application in the
Eastern Mediterranean. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10093. [CrossRef]
29. Christopoulos, S.R.G.; Varotsos, P.K.; Perez-Oregon, J.; Papadopoulou, K.A.; Skordas, E.S.; Sarlis, N.V. Natural Time Analysis of
Global Seismicity. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7496. [CrossRef]
30. Varotsos, P.; Sarlis, N.; Skordas, E.; Uyeda, S.; Kamogawa, M. Natural-time analysis of critical phenomena: The case of seismicity.
Europhys. Lett. 2010, 92, 29002. [CrossRef]
31. Varotsos, P.; Sarlis, N.V.; Skordas, E.S.; Uyeda, S.; Kamogawa, M. Natural time analysis of critical phenomena. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Vulcanologia: Roma, Italy, 2007. [CrossRef]
2. Tertulliani, A.; Antonucci, A.; Berardi, M.; Borghi, A.; Brunelli, G.; Caracciolo, C.H.; Castellano, C.; D’Amico, V.; Del Mese, S.;
Ercolani, E.; et al. Gruppo Operativo Quest Rilievo Macrosismico MW 5.5 Costa Marchigiana del 9/11/2022 Rapporto Finale del
15/11/2022. Available online: https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/15794 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
3. Schultz, K.W.; Sachs, M.K.; Yoder, M.R.; Rundle, J.B.; Turcotte, D.L.; Heien, E.M.; Donnellan, A. Virtual quake: Statistics,
co-seismic deformations and gravity changes for driven earthquake fault systems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium
on Geodesy for Earthquake and Natural Hazards (GENAH), Matsushima, Japan, 22–26 July 2014; Springer: Cham, Switzerland,
2017; pp. 29–37.
4. Christophersen, A.; Rhoades, D.; Colella, H. Precursory seismicity in regions of low strain rate: Insights from a physics-based
earthquake simulator. Geophys. J. Int. 2017, 209, 1513–1525. [CrossRef]
5. Field, E.H. How physics-based earthquake simulators might help improve earthquake forecasts. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2019,
90, 467–472. [CrossRef]
6. Console, R.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R. Physics-Based Simulation of Sequences with Foreshocks, Aftershocks and Multiple Main
Shocks in Italy. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2062. [CrossRef]
7. Console, R.; Murru, M.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R.; Taroni, M.; Falcone, G. Physics-based simulation of sequences with multiple
main shocks in Central Italy. Geophys. J. Int. 2020, 223, 526–542. [CrossRef]
8. Console, R.; Carluccio, R.; Papadimitriou, E.; Karakostas, V. Synthetic earthquake catalogs simulating seismic activity in the
Corinth Gulf, Greece, fault system. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2015, 120, 326–343. [CrossRef]
9. Console, R.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R. The seismicity of the Central Apennines (Italy) studied by means of a physics-based
earthquake simulator. Geophys. J. Int. 2018, 212, 916–929. [CrossRef]
10. Parsons, T.; Geist, E.L.; Console, R.; Carluccio, R. Characteristic earthquake magnitude frequency distributions on faults calculated
from consensus data in California. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2018, 123, 10–761. [CrossRef]
11. Gulia, L.;Wiemer, S. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks. Nature 2019, 574, 193–199. [CrossRef]
12. DISS_Working_Group. Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), Version 3.3.0: A Compilation of Potential Sources for
Earthquakes Larger Than M 5.5 in Italy and Surrounding Areas; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia: Roma, Italy, 2021.
Available online: http://diss.rm.ingv.it/diss/ (accessed on 14 February 2023). [CrossRef]
13. Vannoli, P.; Basili, R.; Valensise, G. New geomorphic evidence for anticlinal growth driven by blind-thrust faulting along the
northern Marche coastal belt (central Italy). J. Seismol. 2004, 8, 297–312. [CrossRef]
14. Fantoni, R.; Franciosi, R. Tectono-sedimentary setting of the Po Plain and Adriatic foreland. Rend. Lincei 2010, 21, 197–209.
[CrossRef]
15. Kastelic, V.; Vannoli, P.; Burrato, P.; Fracassi, U.; Tiberti, M.M.; Valensise, G. Seismogenic sources in the Adriatic Domain. Mar.
Pet. Geol. 2013, 42, 191–213. [CrossRef]
16. Elter, P.; Giglia, G.; Tongiorgi, M.; Trevisan, L. Tensional and Compressional Areas in the Recent (Tortonian to Present) Evolution
of the Northern Apennines. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 1975, 17, 3–18.
17. Maesano, F.E.; Toscani, G.; Burrato, P.; Mirabella, F.; D’Ambrogi, C.; Basili, R. Deriving thrust fault slip rates from geological
modeling: Examples from the Marche coastal and offshore contraction belt, Northern Apennines, Italy. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2013,
42, 122–134. [CrossRef]
18. Rovida, A.N.; Locati, M.; Camassi, R.D.; Lolli, B.; Gasperini, P.; Antonucci, A. Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani CPTI15,
Versione 4.0; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Roma, Italy, 2022. [CrossRef]
19. Vannoli, P.; Vannucci, G.; Bernardi, F.; Palombo, B.; Ferrari, G. The source of the 30 October 1930 M w 5.8 Senigallia (Central
Italy) earthquake: A convergent solution from instrumental, macroseismic, and geological data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2015,
105, 1548–1561. [CrossRef]
20. Vannoli, P.; Bernardi, F.; Palombo, B.; Vannucci, G.; Console, R.; Ferrari, G. New constraints shed light on strike-slip faulting
beneath the southern Apennines (Italy): The 21 August 1962 Irpinia multiple earthquake. Tectonophysics 2016, 691, 375–384.
[CrossRef]
21. Guidoboni, E.; Ferrari, G.; Mariotti, D.; Comastri, A.; Tarabusi, G.; Sgattoni, G.; Valensise, G. CFTI5Med, Catalogo dei Forti Terremoti
in Italia (461 aC-1997) e nell’area Mediterranea (760 aC-1500); Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy,
2018. [CrossRef]
22. Maramai, A.; Graziani, L.; Brizuela, B. Euro-Mediterranean Tsunami Catalogue (EMTC), Version 2.0; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e
Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy, 2019. [CrossRef]
23. Leonard, M. Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations: Update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults. Bull.
Seismol. Soc. Am. 2014, 104, 2953–2965. [CrossRef]
24. Console, R.; Carluccio, R. Earthquake Simulators Development and Application. In Statistical Methods and Modeling of Seismogenesis;
Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2021; p. 27.
25. Console, R.; Carluccio, R.; Murru, M.; Papadimitriou, E.; Karakostas, V. Physics-Based Simulation of Spatiotemporal Patterns of
Earthquakes in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, Fault System. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2022, 112, 98–117. [CrossRef]
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3746 11 of 11
26. Rundle, J.B.; Turcotte, D.; Donnellan, A.; Grant Ludwig, L.; Luginbuhl, M.; Gong, G. Nowcasting earthquakes. Earth Space Sci.
2016, 3, 480–486. [CrossRef]
27. Rundle, J.B.; Stein, S.; Donnellan, A.; Turcotte, D.L.; Klein, W.; Saylor, C. The complex dynamics of earthquake fault systems:
New approaches to forecasting and nowcasting of earthquakes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 076801. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Varotsos, P.K.; Perez-Oregon, J.; Skordas, E.S.; Sarlis, N.V. Estimating the epicenter of an impending strong earthquake by
combining the seismicity order parameter variability analysis with earthquake networks and nowcasting: Application in the
Eastern Mediterranean. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10093. [CrossRef]
29. Christopoulos, S.R.G.; Varotsos, P.K.; Perez-Oregon, J.; Papadopoulou, K.A.; Skordas, E.S.; Sarlis, N.V. Natural Time Analysis of
Global Seismicity. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7496. [CrossRef]
30. Varotsos, P.; Sarlis, N.; Skordas, E.; Uyeda, S.; Kamogawa, M. Natural-time analysis of critical phenomena: The case of seismicity.
Europhys. Lett. 2010, 92, 29002. [CrossRef]
31. Varotsos, P.; Sarlis, N.V.; Skordas, E.S.; Uyeda, S.; Kamogawa, M. Natural time analysis of critical phenomena. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Console_etal_2023_AppliedSciences.pdf
Description
Open Access published article
Size
2.6 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
122d0dbf8f0fa9191bb02c2ae6ccd5ec
