Constraining families of dynamic models using geological, geodetic and strong ground motion data: The Mw 6.5, October 30th, 2016, Norcia earthquake, Italy
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
3T. Fisica dei terremoti e Sorgente Sismica
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Issue/vol(year)
/576 (2021)
ISSN
0012-821X
Publisher
Elsevier
Pages (printed)
117237
Date Issued
2021
Alternative Location
Abstract
The 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence is characterized by remarkable rupture complexity, including highly heterogeneous slip across multiple faults in an extensional tectonic regime. The dense coverage and high quality of geodetic and seismic data allow us to image intriguing details of the rupture kinematics of the largest earthquake of the sequence, the Mw 6.5 October 30th, 2016 Norcia earthquake, such as an energetically weak nucleation phase. Several kinematic models suggest multiple fault planes rupturing simultaneously, however, the mechanical viability of such models is not guaranteed.
Using 3D dynamic rupture and seismic wave propagation simulations accounting for two fault planes, we constrain “families” of spontaneous dynamic models informed by a high-resolution kinematic rupture model of the earthquake. These families differ in their parameterization of initial heterogeneous shear stress and strength in the framework of linear slip weakening friction.
First, we dynamically validate the kinematically inferred two-fault geometry and rake inferences with models based on only depth-dependent stress and constant friction coefficients. Then, more complex models with spatially heterogeneous dynamic parameters allow us to retrieve slip distributions similar to the target kinematic model and yield good agreement with seismic and geodetic observations. We discuss the consistency of the assumed constant or heterogeneous static and dynamic friction coefficients with mechanical properties of rocks at 3-10 km depth characterizing the Italian Central Apennines and their local geological and lithological implications. We suggest that suites of well-fitting dynamic rupture models belonging to the same family generally exist and can be derived by exploiting the trade-offs between dynamic parameters. Our approach will be applicable to validate the viability of kinematic models and classify spontaneous dynamic rupture scenarios that match seismic and geodetic observations as well as geological constraints.
Using 3D dynamic rupture and seismic wave propagation simulations accounting for two fault planes, we constrain “families” of spontaneous dynamic models informed by a high-resolution kinematic rupture model of the earthquake. These families differ in their parameterization of initial heterogeneous shear stress and strength in the framework of linear slip weakening friction.
First, we dynamically validate the kinematically inferred two-fault geometry and rake inferences with models based on only depth-dependent stress and constant friction coefficients. Then, more complex models with spatially heterogeneous dynamic parameters allow us to retrieve slip distributions similar to the target kinematic model and yield good agreement with seismic and geodetic observations. We discuss the consistency of the assumed constant or heterogeneous static and dynamic friction coefficients with mechanical properties of rocks at 3-10 km depth characterizing the Italian Central Apennines and their local geological and lithological implications. We suggest that suites of well-fitting dynamic rupture models belonging to the same family generally exist and can be derived by exploiting the trade-offs between dynamic parameters. Our approach will be applicable to validate the viability of kinematic models and classify spontaneous dynamic rupture scenarios that match seismic and geodetic observations as well as geological constraints.
Sponsors
T.U., T., D.L., and A.-A. Gabriel are supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (TEAR, agreement No. 852992 and ChEESE, grant no. 823844), the German Research Foundation (DFG project grants no. GA 2465/2-1 and GA 2465/3-1) and by KAUST-CRG (grant no. ORS-2017-CRG6 3389.02). E.T. was supported by Progetti di Ricerca Sapienza (RM120172A2EAC019). Computing resources were provided by the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (LRZ, project no. pr63qo on SuperMUC-NG).
References
Ando, R., Kaneko, Y., 2018. Dynamic rupture simulation reproduces spontaneous multifault rupture and arrest during the 2016 M w 7.9 Kaikoura earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 12,875–12,883. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018GL080550.
Andrews, D.J., 1976. Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain. J. Geophys. Res.81, 3575–3582. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /JB081i020p03575.
Andrews, D.J., 1980. A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case. Technical Report B7. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /JB085iB07p03867.
Andrews, D.J., 2004. Rupture models with dynamically determined breakdown displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.94, 769–775. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120030142.
Aochi, H., 2018. Dynamic asymmetry of normal and reverse faults due to con-strained depth-dependent stress accumulation. Geophys. J. Int.215, 2134–2143. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggy407.
Aochi, H., Twardzik, C., 2020. Imaging of seismogenic asperities of the 2016 ML 6.0 amatrice, central Italy, earthquake through dynamic rupture simulations. Pure Appl. Geophys.177, 1931–1946. https://doi .org /10 .1007 /s00024 -019 -02199 -z.
Bai, K., Ampuero, J.P., 2017. Effect of seismogenic depth and background stress on physical limits of earthquake rupture across fault step overs. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth122, 10,280–10,298. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017JB014848.
Barall, M., Harris, R.A., 2015. Metrics for comparing dynamic earthquake rup-ture simulations. Seismol. Res. Lett.86, 223–235. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0220140122.
Barenblatt, G.I., 1959. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle frac-ture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech.23, 622–636. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /0021 -8928(59 )90157 -1.
Bhat, H.S., Olives, M., Dmowska, R., Rice, J.R., 2007. Role of fault branches in earth-quake rupture dynamics. J. Geophys. Res.112, B11309. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2007JB005027.
Bonini, L., Basili, R., Burrato, P., Cannelli, V., Fracassi, U., Maesano, F.E., Melini, D., Tarabusi, G., Tiberti, M.M., Vannoli, P., Valensise, G., 2019. Testing different tec-tonic models for the source of the Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, Norcia earthquake (Central Italy): a youthful normal fault, or negative inversion of an old thrust? Tectonics38, 990–1017. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018TC005185.
Byerlee, J., 1978. Friction of rocks. In: Rock Friction and Earthquake Prediction. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp.615–626. https://link.springer.com /chapter /10 .1007 /978 -3 -0348 -7182 -2 _4.
Causse, M., Dalguer, L.A., Mai, P.M., 2014. Variability of dynamic source parame-ters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int.196, 1754–1769. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggt478.
Cheloni, D., De Novellis, V., Albano, M., Antonioli, A., Anzidei, M., Atzori, S., Aval-lone, A., Bignami, C., Bonano, M., Calcaterra, S., Castaldo, R., Casu, F., Cecere, G., De Luca, C., Devoti, R., Di Bucci, D., Esposito, A., Galvani, A., Gambino, P., Giu-liani, R., Lanari, R., Manunta, M., Manzo, M., Mattone, M., Montuori, A., Pepe, A., Pepe, S., Pezzo, G., Pietrantonio, G., Polcari, M., Riguzzi, F., Salvi, S., Sepe, V., Serpelloni, E., Solaro, G., Stramondo, S., Tizzani, P., Tolomei, C., Trasatti, E., Va-lerio, E., Zinno, I., Doglioni, C., 2017. Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 6778–6787. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017GL073580.
Chiaraluce, L., Di Stefano, R., Tinti, E., Scognamiglio, L., Michele, M., Casarotti, E., Cattaneo, M., De Gori, P., Chiarabba, C., Monachesi, G., Lombardi, A., Valoroso, L., Latorre, D., Marzorati, S., 2017. The 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: a first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol. Res. Lett.88. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0220160221.
Cocco, M., Tinti, E., 2008. Scale dependence in the dynamics of earthquake propaga-tion: evidence from seismological and geological observations. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.273, 123–131.
Collettini, C., Tesei, T., Scuderi, M.M., Carpenter, B.M., Viti, C., 2019. Beyond Byer-lee friction, weak faults and implications for slip behavior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.519, 245–263. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2019 .05 .011.
Day, S.M., Dalguer, L.A., Lapusta, N., Liu, Y., 2005. Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth110, 1–23. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2005JB003813.
De Paola, N., Holdsworth, R.E., Viti, C., Collettini, C., Bullock, R., 2015. Can grain size sensitive flow lubricate faults during the initial stages of earthquake propaga-tion? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.431, 48–58. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2015 .09 .002.
Di Toro, G., Han, R., Hirose, T., De Paola, N., Nielsen, S., Mizoguchi, K., Ferri, F., Cocco, M., Shimamoto, T., 2011. Fault lubrication during earthquakes. Na-ture471, 494–498. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /nature09838.
Dieterich, J.H., 1979. Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res.84, 2161. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /JB084iB05p02161.
Douilly, R., Oglesby, D.D., Cooke, M.L., Hatch, J.L., 2020. Dynamic models of earth-quake rupture along branch faults of the eastern San Gorgonio pass region in California using complex fault structure. Geosphere16, 474–489. https://doi .org /10 .1130 /GES02192 .1.
Dumbser, M., Käser, M., 2006. An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes -II. The three-dimensional isotropic case. Geophys. J. Int.167, 319–336. https://doi .org /10 .1111 /j .1365 -246X .2006 .03120 .x.
Dunham, E.M., 2005. Dissipative interface waves and the transient response of a three-dimensional sliding interface with Coulomb friction. J. Mech. Phys. Solids53, 327–357. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .jmps .2004 .07.003.
Fukuyama, E., Mikumo, T., 1993. Dynamic rupture analysis: inversion for the source process of the 1990 Izu-Oshima, Japan, earthquake (M =6.5). J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth98, 6529–6542. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /92JB02451.
Gabriel, A.A., Ampuero, J.P., Dalguer, L.A., Mai, P.M., 2012. The transition of dynamic rupture styles in elastic media under velocity-weakening friction. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth117, 9311. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2012JB009468.
Galloviˇc, F., Valentová Ampuero, J.P., Gabriel, A.A., 2019. Bayesian dynamic finite-fault inversion: 2. Application to the 2016 Mw 6.2 amatrice, Italy, earth-quake. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth124, 6970–6988. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2019JB017512.
Galvez, P., Ampuero, J.P., Dalguer, L.A., Somala, S.N., Nissen-Meyer, T., 2014. Dy-namic earthquake rupture modelled with an unstructured 3-D spectral ele-ment method applied to the 2011 M9 Tohoku earthquake. Geophys. J. Int.198, 1222–1240. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggu203.
Goto, H., Sawada, S., 2010. Trade-offs among dynamic parameters inferred from re-sults of dynamic source inversion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.100, 910–922. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120080250.
Guatteri, M., Spudich, P., 2000. What can strong-motion data tell us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.90, 98–116. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0119990053.
Harris, R.A., Aagaard, B., Barall, M., Ma, S., Roten, D., Olsen, K., Duan, B., Liu, D., Luo, B., Bai, K., Ampuero, J.P., Kaneko, Y., Gabriel, A.A., Duru, K., Ulrich, T., Wollherr, S., Shi, Z., Dunham, E., Bydlon, S., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., Somala, S.N., Pelties, C., Tago, J., Cruz-Atienza, V.M., Kozdon, J., Daub, E., Aslam, K., Kase, Y., Withers, K., Dalguer, L., 2018. A suite of exercises for verifying dynamic earthquake rupture codes. Seismol. Res. Lett.89, 1146–1162. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0220170222.
Harris, R.A., Barall, M., Lockner, D.A., Moore, D.E., Ponce, D.A., Graymer, R.W., Fun-ning, G., Morrow, C.A., Kyriakopoulos, C., Eberhart-Phillips, D., 2021. A geology and geodesy based model of dynamic earthquake rupture on the Rodgers Creek-Hayward-Calaveras fault system, California. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth126, e2020JB020577. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2020jb020577.
Haskell, N.A., 1964. Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radia-tion from propagating faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.54, 1811–1841.
Heinecke, A., Breuer, A., Rettenberger, S., Bader, M., Gabriel, A.A., Pelties, C., Bode, A., Barth, W., Liao, X.K., Vaidyanathan, K., Smelyanskiy, M., Dubey, P., 2014. Petascale high order dynamic rupture earthquake simulations on heterogeneous supercomputers. In: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. SC. IEEE Computer Society, pp.3–14.
Herrmann, R.B., Malagnini, L., Munafò, I., 2011. Regional moment tensors of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake sequence. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.101, 975–993. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120100184.
Kyriakopoulos, C., Oglesby, D.D., Rockwell, T.K., Meltzner, A.J., Barall, M., Fletcher, J.M., Tulanowski, D., 2019. Dynamic rupture scenarios in the Brawley Seismic Zone, Salton Trough, Southern California. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth124, 3680–3707. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018JB016795.
Lambert, V., Lapusta, N., Perry, S., 2021. Propagation of large earthquakes as self-healing pulses or mild cracks. Nature591, 252–258. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /s41586 -021 -03248 -1.
Ma, S., Beroza, G.C., 2008. Rupture dynamics on a bimaterial interface for dip-ping faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.98, 1642–1658. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120070201.
Mariucci, M.T., Montone, P., 2020. IPSI 1.4, database of Italian present-day stress indicators. https://doi .org /10 .13127 /IPSI .1.4.
Michele, M., Chiaraluce, L., Di Stefano, R., Waldhauser, F., 2020. Fine-scale struc-ture of the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence from data recorded at the Italian national network. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth125, 1–26. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2019JB018440.
Michelini, A., Margheriti, L., Cattaneo, M., Cecere, G., D’Anna, G., Delladio, A., Moretti, M., Pintore, S., Amato, A., Basili, A., Bono, A., Casale, P., Danecek, P., Demartin, M., Faenza, L., Lauciani, V., Giovanni Mandiello, A., Marchetti, A., Marcocci, C., Mazza, S., Mariano Mele, F., Nardi, A., Nostro, C., Pignone, M., Quintiliani, M., Rao, S., Scognamiglio, L., Selvaggi, G., 2016. The Italian national seismic net-work and the earthquake and tsunami monitoring and surveillance systems. Adv. Geosci.43, 31–38. https://doi .org /10 .5194 /adgeo -43 -31 -2016.
Murphy, S., Di Toro, G., Romano, F., Scala, A., Lorito, S., Spagnuolo, E., Aretusini, S., Festa, G., Piatanesi, A., Nielsen, S., 2018. Tsunamigenic earthquake simulations using experimentally derived friction laws. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.486, 155–165. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2018 .01.011.
Oglesby, D.D., Archuleta, R.J., Nielsen, S.B., 1998. Earthquakes on dipping faults: the effects of broken symmetry. Science280, 1055–1059. https://doi .org /10 .1126 /science .280 .5366 .1055.
Ohnaka, M., Kuwahara, Y., Yamamoto, K., 1987. Constitutive relations between dy-namic physical parameters near a tip of the propagating slip zone during stick-slip shear failure. Tectonophysics144, 109–125. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /0040 -1951(87 )90011 -4.
Palgunadi, K.H., Gabriel, A.A., Ulrich, T., Lopez-Comino, J.A., Mai, P.M., 2020. Dynamic fault interaction during a fluid-injection-induced earthquake: the 2017 mw 5.5 pohang event. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.110, 2328–2349. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120200106.
Palmer, A.C., Rice, J.R., 1973. The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci.332, 527–548. https://doi .org /10 .1098 /rspa .1973 .0040.
Pelties, C., Gabriel, A.A., Ampuero, J.P., 2014. Verification of an ADER-DG method for complex dynamic rupture problems. Geosci. Model Dev.7, 847–866. https://doi .org /10 .5194 /gmd -7 -847 -2014.
Pizzi, A., Di Domenica, A., Galloviˇc, F., Luzi, L., Puglia, R., 2017. Fault segmentation as constraint to the occurrence of the main shocks of the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence. Tectonics36, 2370–2387. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017TC004652.
Porreca, M., Minelli, G., Ercoli, M., Brobia, A., Mancinelli, P., Cruciani, F., Giorgetti, C., Carboni, F., Mirabella, F., Cavinato, G., Cannata, A., Pauselli, C., Barchi, M.R., 2018. Seismic reflection profiles and subsurface geology of the area interested by the 2016-2017 earthquake sequence (Central Italy). Tectonics37, 1116–1137. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017TC004915.
Ragon, T., Sladen, A., Simons, M., 2018. Accounting for uncertain fault geometry in earthquake source inversions – I: theory and simplified application. Geophys. J. Int.214, 1174–1190. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggy187.
Ripperger, J., Ampuero, J.P., Mai, P.M., Giardini, D., 2007. Earthquake source charac-teristics from dynamic rupture with constrained stochastic fault stress. J. Geo-phys. Res., Solid Earth112, 4311. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2006JB004515.
Ruggieri, R., Scuderi, M.M., Trippetta, F., Tinti, E., Brignoli, M., Mantica, S., Petroselli, S., Osculati, L., Volontè, G., Collettini, C., 2021. The role of shale content and pore-water saturation on frictional properties of simulated carbonate faults. Tectonophysics807, 228811. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .tecto .2021.228811.
Savran, W.H., Olsen, K.B., 2020. Kinematic rupture generator based on 3-D spon-taneous rupture simulations along geometrically rough faults. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth125, 1–22. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2020JB019464.
Schmedes, J., Archuleta, R.J., Lavallée, D., 2010. Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations. J. Geophys. Res.115, B03304. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2009JB006689.
Scognamiglio, L., Tinti, E., Casarotti, E., Pucci, S., Villani, F., Cocco, M., Magnoni, F., Michelini, A., Dreger, D., 2018. Complex fault geometry and rupture dynamics of the Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, central Italy earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth123, 2943–2964. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2018JB015603.
Scuderi, M.M., Niemeijer, A.R., Collettini, C., Marone, C., 2013. Frictional properties and slip stability of active faults within carbonate-evaporite sequences: the role of dolomite and anhydrite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.369–370, 220–232. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2013 .03 .024.
Shimizu, K., Yagi, Y., Okuwaki, R., Fukahata, Y., 2020. Development of an inversion method to extract information on fault geometry from teleseismic data. Geo-phys. J. Int.220, 1055–1065. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggz496.
Spudich, P., Guatteri, M., Otsuki, K., Minagawa, J., 1998. Use of Fault striations and Dislocation Models to Infer Tectonic Shear Stress during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake. Technical Report 2. http://pubs .geoscienceworld .org /ssa /bssa /article -pdf /88 /2 /413 /2709377 /BSSA0880020413 .pdf.
Tang, R., Yuan, J., Gan, L., 2021. Free-surface-induced supershear transition in 3-D simulations of spontaneous dynamic rupture on oblique faults. Geophys. Res. Lett.48, e2020GL091621. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2020GL091621.
Tinti, E., Cocco, M., Fukuyama, E., Piatanesi, A., 2009. Dependence of slip weakening distance (Dc) on final slip during dynamic rupture of earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int.177, 1205–1220. https://doi .org /10 .1111 /j .1365 -246X .2009 .04143 .x.
Tinti, E., Scognamiglio, L., Michelini, A., Cocco, M., 2016. Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the ML 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophys. Res. Lett.43. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2016GL071263.
Tinti, E., Spudich, P., Cocco, M., 2005. Earthquake fracture energy inferred from kine-matic rupture models on extended faults. J. Geophys. Res.110, B12303. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2005JB003644.
Ulrich, T., Gabriel, A.A., Ampuero, J.P., Xu, W., 2019. Dynamic viability of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaik¯oura earthquake cascade on weak crustal faults. Nat. Commun.10, 1–16. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /s41467 -019 -09125 -w.
Uphoff, C., Rettenberger, S., Bader, M., Madden, E.H., Ulrich, T., Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A.A., 2017. Extreme scale multi-physics simulations of the tsunamigenic 2004 Sumatra megathrust earthquake. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., New York, NY, USA, pp.1–16. https://dl .acm .org /doi /10 .1145 /3126908 .3126948.
Viesca, R.C., Garagash, D.I., 2015. Ubiquitous weakening of faults due to thermal pressurization. Nat. Geosci.8, 875–879. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /ngeo2554.
Walters, R.J., Gregory, L.C., Wedmore, L.N.J., Craig, T.J., Mccaffrey, K., Wilkinson, M., Chen, J., Li, Z., Elliott, J.R., Goodall, H., Iezzi, F., Livio, F., Michetti, A.M., Roberts, G., Vittori, E., 2018. Dual control of fault intersections on stop-start rupture in the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.500, 1–14. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2018 .07.043.
Wang, K., Dreger, D.S., Tinti, E., Bürgmann, R., Taira, T., 2020. Rupture process of the 2019 ridgecrest, California mw 6.4 foreshock and mw 7.1 earthquake constrained by seismic and geodetic data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.110, 1603–1626. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120200108.
Weng, H., Yang, H., 2018. Constraining frictional properties on fault by dynamic rup-ture simulations and near-field observations. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth123, 6658–6670. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2017JB015414.
Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A., Mai, P.M., 2019. Landers 1992 “reloaded”: integrative dynamic earthquake rupture modeling. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth124, 6666–6702. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018JB016355.
Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A.A., Uphoff, C., 2018. Off-fault plasticity in three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulations using a modal discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes: implementation, verification and application. Geophys. J. Int.214, 1556–1584. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /GJI /GGY213.
Yagi, Y., Fukahata, Y., 2011. Introduction of uncertainty of Green’s function into waveform inversion for seismic source processes. Geophys. J. Int.186, 711–720. https://doi .org /10 .1111 /j .1365 -246X .2011.05043 .x.
Andrews, D.J., 1976. Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain. J. Geophys. Res.81, 3575–3582. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /JB081i020p03575.
Andrews, D.J., 1980. A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case. Technical Report B7. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /JB085iB07p03867.
Andrews, D.J., 2004. Rupture models with dynamically determined breakdown displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.94, 769–775. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120030142.
Aochi, H., 2018. Dynamic asymmetry of normal and reverse faults due to con-strained depth-dependent stress accumulation. Geophys. J. Int.215, 2134–2143. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggy407.
Aochi, H., Twardzik, C., 2020. Imaging of seismogenic asperities of the 2016 ML 6.0 amatrice, central Italy, earthquake through dynamic rupture simulations. Pure Appl. Geophys.177, 1931–1946. https://doi .org /10 .1007 /s00024 -019 -02199 -z.
Bai, K., Ampuero, J.P., 2017. Effect of seismogenic depth and background stress on physical limits of earthquake rupture across fault step overs. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth122, 10,280–10,298. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017JB014848.
Barall, M., Harris, R.A., 2015. Metrics for comparing dynamic earthquake rup-ture simulations. Seismol. Res. Lett.86, 223–235. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0220140122.
Barenblatt, G.I., 1959. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle frac-ture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech.23, 622–636. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /0021 -8928(59 )90157 -1.
Bhat, H.S., Olives, M., Dmowska, R., Rice, J.R., 2007. Role of fault branches in earth-quake rupture dynamics. J. Geophys. Res.112, B11309. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2007JB005027.
Bonini, L., Basili, R., Burrato, P., Cannelli, V., Fracassi, U., Maesano, F.E., Melini, D., Tarabusi, G., Tiberti, M.M., Vannoli, P., Valensise, G., 2019. Testing different tec-tonic models for the source of the Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, Norcia earthquake (Central Italy): a youthful normal fault, or negative inversion of an old thrust? Tectonics38, 990–1017. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018TC005185.
Byerlee, J., 1978. Friction of rocks. In: Rock Friction and Earthquake Prediction. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp.615–626. https://link.springer.com /chapter /10 .1007 /978 -3 -0348 -7182 -2 _4.
Causse, M., Dalguer, L.A., Mai, P.M., 2014. Variability of dynamic source parame-ters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int.196, 1754–1769. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggt478.
Cheloni, D., De Novellis, V., Albano, M., Antonioli, A., Anzidei, M., Atzori, S., Aval-lone, A., Bignami, C., Bonano, M., Calcaterra, S., Castaldo, R., Casu, F., Cecere, G., De Luca, C., Devoti, R., Di Bucci, D., Esposito, A., Galvani, A., Gambino, P., Giu-liani, R., Lanari, R., Manunta, M., Manzo, M., Mattone, M., Montuori, A., Pepe, A., Pepe, S., Pezzo, G., Pietrantonio, G., Polcari, M., Riguzzi, F., Salvi, S., Sepe, V., Serpelloni, E., Solaro, G., Stramondo, S., Tizzani, P., Tolomei, C., Trasatti, E., Va-lerio, E., Zinno, I., Doglioni, C., 2017. Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 6778–6787. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017GL073580.
Chiaraluce, L., Di Stefano, R., Tinti, E., Scognamiglio, L., Michele, M., Casarotti, E., Cattaneo, M., De Gori, P., Chiarabba, C., Monachesi, G., Lombardi, A., Valoroso, L., Latorre, D., Marzorati, S., 2017. The 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: a first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol. Res. Lett.88. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0220160221.
Cocco, M., Tinti, E., 2008. Scale dependence in the dynamics of earthquake propaga-tion: evidence from seismological and geological observations. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.273, 123–131.
Collettini, C., Tesei, T., Scuderi, M.M., Carpenter, B.M., Viti, C., 2019. Beyond Byer-lee friction, weak faults and implications for slip behavior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.519, 245–263. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2019 .05 .011.
Day, S.M., Dalguer, L.A., Lapusta, N., Liu, Y., 2005. Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth110, 1–23. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2005JB003813.
De Paola, N., Holdsworth, R.E., Viti, C., Collettini, C., Bullock, R., 2015. Can grain size sensitive flow lubricate faults during the initial stages of earthquake propaga-tion? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.431, 48–58. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2015 .09 .002.
Di Toro, G., Han, R., Hirose, T., De Paola, N., Nielsen, S., Mizoguchi, K., Ferri, F., Cocco, M., Shimamoto, T., 2011. Fault lubrication during earthquakes. Na-ture471, 494–498. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /nature09838.
Dieterich, J.H., 1979. Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res.84, 2161. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /JB084iB05p02161.
Douilly, R., Oglesby, D.D., Cooke, M.L., Hatch, J.L., 2020. Dynamic models of earth-quake rupture along branch faults of the eastern San Gorgonio pass region in California using complex fault structure. Geosphere16, 474–489. https://doi .org /10 .1130 /GES02192 .1.
Dumbser, M., Käser, M., 2006. An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes -II. The three-dimensional isotropic case. Geophys. J. Int.167, 319–336. https://doi .org /10 .1111 /j .1365 -246X .2006 .03120 .x.
Dunham, E.M., 2005. Dissipative interface waves and the transient response of a three-dimensional sliding interface with Coulomb friction. J. Mech. Phys. Solids53, 327–357. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .jmps .2004 .07.003.
Fukuyama, E., Mikumo, T., 1993. Dynamic rupture analysis: inversion for the source process of the 1990 Izu-Oshima, Japan, earthquake (M =6.5). J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth98, 6529–6542. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /92JB02451.
Gabriel, A.A., Ampuero, J.P., Dalguer, L.A., Mai, P.M., 2012. The transition of dynamic rupture styles in elastic media under velocity-weakening friction. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth117, 9311. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2012JB009468.
Galloviˇc, F., Valentová Ampuero, J.P., Gabriel, A.A., 2019. Bayesian dynamic finite-fault inversion: 2. Application to the 2016 Mw 6.2 amatrice, Italy, earth-quake. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth124, 6970–6988. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2019JB017512.
Galvez, P., Ampuero, J.P., Dalguer, L.A., Somala, S.N., Nissen-Meyer, T., 2014. Dy-namic earthquake rupture modelled with an unstructured 3-D spectral ele-ment method applied to the 2011 M9 Tohoku earthquake. Geophys. J. Int.198, 1222–1240. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggu203.
Goto, H., Sawada, S., 2010. Trade-offs among dynamic parameters inferred from re-sults of dynamic source inversion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.100, 910–922. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120080250.
Guatteri, M., Spudich, P., 2000. What can strong-motion data tell us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.90, 98–116. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0119990053.
Harris, R.A., Aagaard, B., Barall, M., Ma, S., Roten, D., Olsen, K., Duan, B., Liu, D., Luo, B., Bai, K., Ampuero, J.P., Kaneko, Y., Gabriel, A.A., Duru, K., Ulrich, T., Wollherr, S., Shi, Z., Dunham, E., Bydlon, S., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., Somala, S.N., Pelties, C., Tago, J., Cruz-Atienza, V.M., Kozdon, J., Daub, E., Aslam, K., Kase, Y., Withers, K., Dalguer, L., 2018. A suite of exercises for verifying dynamic earthquake rupture codes. Seismol. Res. Lett.89, 1146–1162. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0220170222.
Harris, R.A., Barall, M., Lockner, D.A., Moore, D.E., Ponce, D.A., Graymer, R.W., Fun-ning, G., Morrow, C.A., Kyriakopoulos, C., Eberhart-Phillips, D., 2021. A geology and geodesy based model of dynamic earthquake rupture on the Rodgers Creek-Hayward-Calaveras fault system, California. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth126, e2020JB020577. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2020jb020577.
Haskell, N.A., 1964. Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radia-tion from propagating faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.54, 1811–1841.
Heinecke, A., Breuer, A., Rettenberger, S., Bader, M., Gabriel, A.A., Pelties, C., Bode, A., Barth, W., Liao, X.K., Vaidyanathan, K., Smelyanskiy, M., Dubey, P., 2014. Petascale high order dynamic rupture earthquake simulations on heterogeneous supercomputers. In: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. SC. IEEE Computer Society, pp.3–14.
Herrmann, R.B., Malagnini, L., Munafò, I., 2011. Regional moment tensors of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake sequence. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.101, 975–993. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120100184.
Kyriakopoulos, C., Oglesby, D.D., Rockwell, T.K., Meltzner, A.J., Barall, M., Fletcher, J.M., Tulanowski, D., 2019. Dynamic rupture scenarios in the Brawley Seismic Zone, Salton Trough, Southern California. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth124, 3680–3707. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018JB016795.
Lambert, V., Lapusta, N., Perry, S., 2021. Propagation of large earthquakes as self-healing pulses or mild cracks. Nature591, 252–258. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /s41586 -021 -03248 -1.
Ma, S., Beroza, G.C., 2008. Rupture dynamics on a bimaterial interface for dip-ping faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.98, 1642–1658. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120070201.
Mariucci, M.T., Montone, P., 2020. IPSI 1.4, database of Italian present-day stress indicators. https://doi .org /10 .13127 /IPSI .1.4.
Michele, M., Chiaraluce, L., Di Stefano, R., Waldhauser, F., 2020. Fine-scale struc-ture of the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence from data recorded at the Italian national network. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth125, 1–26. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2019JB018440.
Michelini, A., Margheriti, L., Cattaneo, M., Cecere, G., D’Anna, G., Delladio, A., Moretti, M., Pintore, S., Amato, A., Basili, A., Bono, A., Casale, P., Danecek, P., Demartin, M., Faenza, L., Lauciani, V., Giovanni Mandiello, A., Marchetti, A., Marcocci, C., Mazza, S., Mariano Mele, F., Nardi, A., Nostro, C., Pignone, M., Quintiliani, M., Rao, S., Scognamiglio, L., Selvaggi, G., 2016. The Italian national seismic net-work and the earthquake and tsunami monitoring and surveillance systems. Adv. Geosci.43, 31–38. https://doi .org /10 .5194 /adgeo -43 -31 -2016.
Murphy, S., Di Toro, G., Romano, F., Scala, A., Lorito, S., Spagnuolo, E., Aretusini, S., Festa, G., Piatanesi, A., Nielsen, S., 2018. Tsunamigenic earthquake simulations using experimentally derived friction laws. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.486, 155–165. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2018 .01.011.
Oglesby, D.D., Archuleta, R.J., Nielsen, S.B., 1998. Earthquakes on dipping faults: the effects of broken symmetry. Science280, 1055–1059. https://doi .org /10 .1126 /science .280 .5366 .1055.
Ohnaka, M., Kuwahara, Y., Yamamoto, K., 1987. Constitutive relations between dy-namic physical parameters near a tip of the propagating slip zone during stick-slip shear failure. Tectonophysics144, 109–125. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /0040 -1951(87 )90011 -4.
Palgunadi, K.H., Gabriel, A.A., Ulrich, T., Lopez-Comino, J.A., Mai, P.M., 2020. Dynamic fault interaction during a fluid-injection-induced earthquake: the 2017 mw 5.5 pohang event. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.110, 2328–2349. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120200106.
Palmer, A.C., Rice, J.R., 1973. The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci.332, 527–548. https://doi .org /10 .1098 /rspa .1973 .0040.
Pelties, C., Gabriel, A.A., Ampuero, J.P., 2014. Verification of an ADER-DG method for complex dynamic rupture problems. Geosci. Model Dev.7, 847–866. https://doi .org /10 .5194 /gmd -7 -847 -2014.
Pizzi, A., Di Domenica, A., Galloviˇc, F., Luzi, L., Puglia, R., 2017. Fault segmentation as constraint to the occurrence of the main shocks of the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence. Tectonics36, 2370–2387. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017TC004652.
Porreca, M., Minelli, G., Ercoli, M., Brobia, A., Mancinelli, P., Cruciani, F., Giorgetti, C., Carboni, F., Mirabella, F., Cavinato, G., Cannata, A., Pauselli, C., Barchi, M.R., 2018. Seismic reflection profiles and subsurface geology of the area interested by the 2016-2017 earthquake sequence (Central Italy). Tectonics37, 1116–1137. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2017TC004915.
Ragon, T., Sladen, A., Simons, M., 2018. Accounting for uncertain fault geometry in earthquake source inversions – I: theory and simplified application. Geophys. J. Int.214, 1174–1190. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggy187.
Ripperger, J., Ampuero, J.P., Mai, P.M., Giardini, D., 2007. Earthquake source charac-teristics from dynamic rupture with constrained stochastic fault stress. J. Geo-phys. Res., Solid Earth112, 4311. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2006JB004515.
Ruggieri, R., Scuderi, M.M., Trippetta, F., Tinti, E., Brignoli, M., Mantica, S., Petroselli, S., Osculati, L., Volontè, G., Collettini, C., 2021. The role of shale content and pore-water saturation on frictional properties of simulated carbonate faults. Tectonophysics807, 228811. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .tecto .2021.228811.
Savran, W.H., Olsen, K.B., 2020. Kinematic rupture generator based on 3-D spon-taneous rupture simulations along geometrically rough faults. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth125, 1–22. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2020JB019464.
Schmedes, J., Archuleta, R.J., Lavallée, D., 2010. Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations. J. Geophys. Res.115, B03304. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2009JB006689.
Scognamiglio, L., Tinti, E., Casarotti, E., Pucci, S., Villani, F., Cocco, M., Magnoni, F., Michelini, A., Dreger, D., 2018. Complex fault geometry and rupture dynamics of the Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, central Italy earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth123, 2943–2964. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2018JB015603.
Scuderi, M.M., Niemeijer, A.R., Collettini, C., Marone, C., 2013. Frictional properties and slip stability of active faults within carbonate-evaporite sequences: the role of dolomite and anhydrite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.369–370, 220–232. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2013 .03 .024.
Shimizu, K., Yagi, Y., Okuwaki, R., Fukahata, Y., 2020. Development of an inversion method to extract information on fault geometry from teleseismic data. Geo-phys. J. Int.220, 1055–1065. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /gji /ggz496.
Spudich, P., Guatteri, M., Otsuki, K., Minagawa, J., 1998. Use of Fault striations and Dislocation Models to Infer Tectonic Shear Stress during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake. Technical Report 2. http://pubs .geoscienceworld .org /ssa /bssa /article -pdf /88 /2 /413 /2709377 /BSSA0880020413 .pdf.
Tang, R., Yuan, J., Gan, L., 2021. Free-surface-induced supershear transition in 3-D simulations of spontaneous dynamic rupture on oblique faults. Geophys. Res. Lett.48, e2020GL091621. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2020GL091621.
Tinti, E., Cocco, M., Fukuyama, E., Piatanesi, A., 2009. Dependence of slip weakening distance (Dc) on final slip during dynamic rupture of earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int.177, 1205–1220. https://doi .org /10 .1111 /j .1365 -246X .2009 .04143 .x.
Tinti, E., Scognamiglio, L., Michelini, A., Cocco, M., 2016. Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the ML 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophys. Res. Lett.43. https://doi .org /10 .1002 /2016GL071263.
Tinti, E., Spudich, P., Cocco, M., 2005. Earthquake fracture energy inferred from kine-matic rupture models on extended faults. J. Geophys. Res.110, B12303. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2005JB003644.
Ulrich, T., Gabriel, A.A., Ampuero, J.P., Xu, W., 2019. Dynamic viability of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaik¯oura earthquake cascade on weak crustal faults. Nat. Commun.10, 1–16. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /s41467 -019 -09125 -w.
Uphoff, C., Rettenberger, S., Bader, M., Madden, E.H., Ulrich, T., Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A.A., 2017. Extreme scale multi-physics simulations of the tsunamigenic 2004 Sumatra megathrust earthquake. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., New York, NY, USA, pp.1–16. https://dl .acm .org /doi /10 .1145 /3126908 .3126948.
Viesca, R.C., Garagash, D.I., 2015. Ubiquitous weakening of faults due to thermal pressurization. Nat. Geosci.8, 875–879. https://doi .org /10 .1038 /ngeo2554.
Walters, R.J., Gregory, L.C., Wedmore, L.N.J., Craig, T.J., Mccaffrey, K., Wilkinson, M., Chen, J., Li, Z., Elliott, J.R., Goodall, H., Iezzi, F., Livio, F., Michetti, A.M., Roberts, G., Vittori, E., 2018. Dual control of fault intersections on stop-start rupture in the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.500, 1–14. https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .epsl .2018 .07.043.
Wang, K., Dreger, D.S., Tinti, E., Bürgmann, R., Taira, T., 2020. Rupture process of the 2019 ridgecrest, California mw 6.4 foreshock and mw 7.1 earthquake constrained by seismic and geodetic data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.110, 1603–1626. https://doi .org /10 .1785 /0120200108.
Weng, H., Yang, H., 2018. Constraining frictional properties on fault by dynamic rup-ture simulations and near-field observations. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth123, 6658–6670. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2017JB015414.
Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A., Mai, P.M., 2019. Landers 1992 “reloaded”: integrative dynamic earthquake rupture modeling. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth124, 6666–6702. https://doi .org /10 .1029 /2018JB016355.
Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A.A., Uphoff, C., 2018. Off-fault plasticity in three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulations using a modal discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes: implementation, verification and application. Geophys. J. Int.214, 1556–1584. https://doi .org /10 .1093 /GJI /GGY213.
Yagi, Y., Fukahata, Y., 2011. Introduction of uncertainty of Green’s function into waveform inversion for seismic source processes. Geophys. J. Int.186, 711–720. https://doi .org /10 .1111 /j .1365 -246X .2011.05043 .x.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
35_2021_Tinti_et_al_EPSL.pdf
Description
Open Access published article
Size
5.13 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
ae3bd16baf829be653fba1dd26670c38
