Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Book chapters
  5. The 5 April 2003 Explosion of Stromboli: Timing of Eruption Dynamics using Thermal Data
 
  • Details

The 5 April 2003 Explosion of Stromboli: Timing of Eruption Dynamics using Thermal Data

Author(s)
Harris, H.  
Ripepe, M.  
Calvari, S.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Catania, Catania, Italia  
Lodato, L.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Catania, Catania, Italia  
Spampinato, L.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Catania, Catania, Italia  
Editor(s)
Calvari, S.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italia  
Inguaggiato, S.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italia  
Puglisi, G.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italia  
Ripepe, M.  
Rosi, M.  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
1.5. TTC - Sorveglianza dell'attività eruttiva dei vulcani
Status
Published
Refereed
Yes
Journal
THE STROMBOLI VOLCANO: An integrated study of the 2002-2003 Eruption  
Date Issued
December 2008
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/4282
Subjects
04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.06. Volcano monitoring  
Subjects

Thermal imaging

Stromboli

Abstract
Stromboli’s 5 April 2003 explosion sent an ash plume to 4 km and blocks to 2 km, representing one of the most powerful events over the last 100 years. A thermal sensor 450 m east of the vent and a helicopter-flown thermal camera captured the event dynamics allowing detailed reconstruction. This review links previous studies providing a complete collation and clarification of the actual event chronology, while showing how relatively inexpensive thermal sensors can be used to provide great insight into processes that cannot be observed from locations outside of the eruption cloud. The eruption progressed through four phases, comprised 29 discrete explosions and lasted 373 s. The opening phase (phase 1) comprised ~30 s of precursory ash emission, with stronger emission beginning after 17 s. This was abruptly terminated by the main blast of phase 2 which comprised emission of a rapidly expanding ash cloud followed, after 0.4 s, by a powerful jet with velocities of up to 320 m/s. A second explosive phase (phase 3) began 38 s later and involved ascent of a phoenix cloud and explosive emission above a lateral vent lasting 75 s. This was followed by a 175-s-long phase of weaker, pulsed emission. The eruption was terminated by a series of three explosions (phase 4) sending ash to ~600 m at velocities of 27-45 m/s and lasting 87 s. Together these results have shown that a low energy opening phase was followed by the highest energy phase. Each phase itself comprised groups of discrete explosions, with energy of the explosions diminishing during the two final phases.
Type
book chapter
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Harris_et_al_05Apr_AGU_Revised.pdf

Description
main article
Size

222.81 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

01a0cca3beade3294e83b4eb94feb08f

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback