A “Geodetic Gap” in the Calabrian Arc: Evidence for a Locked Subduction Megathrust?
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
1T. Struttura della Terra
2TR. Ricostruzione e modellazione della struttura crostale
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Journal
Issue/vol(year)
4/45(2018)
Pages (printed)
1794-1804
Date Issued
2018
Abstract
Subduction of old Ionian seafloor beneath the Calabrian Arc (southern Italy) is the geological
process with the greatest mass flux in the central Mediterranean, yet its seismogenic behavior is largely
obscured. No unambiguous evidence of subduction-related earthquakes exists in historical times, and local
GPS velocities indicate very low strain rates. Nevertheless, the region hosted some of the deadliest
normal-faulting earthquakes of the entire Mediterranean basin. We show that the low strain rates recorded in
southern Calabria can be reconciled with the regional vigorous seismic moment release by assuming high
interseismic coupling but low seismic coupling of the subduction interface. The alternative scenario of
steadily creeping subduction cannot be ruled out but requires the historical seismicity record to be dismissed
as unrepresentative. We refer to the peculiar spatial pattern of short-term strain rates in southern Calabria as a
“geodetic gap” resulting from destructive interference between upper-plate extension and temporary
compression due to locking along the subduction interface. Seismic hazard modelers must understand that
within such gaps, the long-term seismic hazard is greater than that suggested by the low geodetic
strain rates.
process with the greatest mass flux in the central Mediterranean, yet its seismogenic behavior is largely
obscured. No unambiguous evidence of subduction-related earthquakes exists in historical times, and local
GPS velocities indicate very low strain rates. Nevertheless, the region hosted some of the deadliest
normal-faulting earthquakes of the entire Mediterranean basin. We show that the low strain rates recorded in
southern Calabria can be reconciled with the regional vigorous seismic moment release by assuming high
interseismic coupling but low seismic coupling of the subduction interface. The alternative scenario of
steadily creeping subduction cannot be ruled out but requires the historical seismicity record to be dismissed
as unrepresentative. We refer to the peculiar spatial pattern of short-term strain rates in southern Calabria as a
“geodetic gap” resulting from destructive interference between upper-plate extension and temporary
compression due to locking along the subduction interface. Seismic hazard modelers must understand that
within such gaps, the long-term seismic hazard is greater than that suggested by the low geodetic
strain rates.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
2017GL076554(1).pdf
Description
Pdf originale
Size
1.85 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f0cb9fab5a602a0827685751fb924b4d
