Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9043
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallPavón-Carrasco, F. J.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallGómez-Paccard, M.; Geosciences-Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, Cedex, Franceen
dc.contributor.authorallHervé, Gwenaël; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universit€at, Munich, Germanyen
dc.contributor.authorallOsete, M. L.; Departamento de Fısica de la Tierra, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spainen
dc.contributor.authorallChauvin, A.; Geosciences-Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, Cedex, Franceen
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-01T14:03:15Zen
dc.date.available2014-07-01T14:03:15Zen
dc.date.issued2014-06-02en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9043en
dc.description.abstractOne of the main challenges of paleomagnetic research is to obtain high-resolution geomagnetic field intensity reconstructions. For the last millennia, these reconstructions are mostly based on archeomagnetic data. However, the quality of the intensity data available in the databases is very variable, and the high scatter observed in the records clearly suggests that some of them might not be reliable. In this work we investigate how the geomagnetic field intensity reconstructions and, hence, our present knowledge of the geomagnetic field in the past, are affected by the quality of the data selected for modeling the Earth’s magnetic field. For this purpose we rank the European archeointensity data in four quality categories following widely accepted paleomagnetic criteria based on the methodology used during the laboratory treatment of the samples and on the number of specimens retained to calculate the mean intensities. Four geomagnetic field regional models have been implemented by applying the revised spherical cap harmonic analysis to these four groups of input data. Geomagnetic field models strongly depend on the used data set. The model built using all the available data (without any preselection) appears to be the less accurate, indicating some internal inconsistencies of the data set. In addition, some features of this model are clearly dominated by the less reliable archeointensity data, suggesting that such features might not reflect real variations of the past geomagnetic field. On the contrary, the regional model built on selected high-quality intensity data shows a very consistent intensity pattern at the European scale, confirming that the main intensity changes observed in Europe in the recent history of the geomagnetic field occurred at the continental scale.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameAmerican Geophysical Unionen
dc.relation.ispartofGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystemsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/15 (2014)en
dc.subjectGeomagnetismen
dc.subjectPaleomagnetismen
dc.subjectArcheomagnetismen
dc.titleIntensity of the geomagnetic field in Europe for the last 3 ka: Influence of data quality on geomagnetic field modelingen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber2515–2530en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.02. Geomagnetic field variations and reversalsen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.05. Main geomagnetic fielden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.06. Paleomagnetismen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ 2014GC005311en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico1A. Geomagnetismo e Paleomagnetismoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.relation.eissn1525-2027en
dc.contributor.authorPavón-Carrasco, F. J.en
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Paccard, M.en
dc.contributor.authorHervé, Gwenaëlen
dc.contributor.authorOsete, M. L.en
dc.contributor.authorChauvin, A.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentGeosciences-Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, Cedex, Franceen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universit€at, Munich, Germanyen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Fısica de la Tierra, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spainen
dc.contributor.departmentGeosciences-Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, Cedex, Franceen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptGeosciences-Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, Cedex, France-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universit€at, Munich, Germany-
crisitem.author.deptUniv. Complutense Madrid (Spain)-
crisitem.author.deptGeosciences-Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, Cedex, France-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ggge20494.pdf2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

249
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 50

200
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric