Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9023
Authors: Carbone, D.* 
Gibert, D.* 
Marteau, J.* 
Diament, M.* 
Zuccarello, L.* 
Galichet, E.* 
Title: An experiment of muon radiography atMt Etna (Italy)
Journal: Geophysical Journal International 
Series/Report no.: 2/196 (2013)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Issue Date: 25-Oct-2013
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt403
URL: http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/196/2/633
Keywords: Tomography; Volcano monitoring; Volcanic hazards and risks
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.03. Geodesy::04.03.06. Measurements and monitoring 
Abstract: Interactions of conduit geometry with gas–liquid flows control volcanic activity, implying that the evaluation of volcanic hazards requires quantitative understanding of the inner structure of the volcano. The more established geophysical imaging techniques suffer from inherent ambiguity, may require spatially dense measurements in active areas and may not provide sufficient spatial resolution in the uppermost part of the conduit system. It is thus desirable to develop new imaging techniques allowing a better spatial resolution of a volcano's upper feeding system, with reduced ambiguity and a low level of risk for operators. Muon particles can be utilized to image the internal density distribution of volcanic structures. The principle of muon radiography is essentially the same as X-ray radiography, except for substituting penetrating particles in place of photons. Muons are more attenuated by higher density parts inside the target and thus information about its inner structure are obtained from the differential muon absorption. We report on a muon-imaging experiment that was conducted at Mt Etna in 2010. The target structure was one of the summit craters of the volcano. This experiment was performed using a muon telescope suitably designed to withstand the harsh conditions in the summit zone of a high volcano. We found a marked difference between synthetic and observed attenuation of muons through the target. This discrepancy is likely due to the bias on the observed flux, arising from false muon tracks. They are caused by low-energy particles that, by chance, hit simultaneously the two matrixes of the telescope, leading to detection of a false positive. We separated the useful from the unwanted signal through a first-order model of the background noise. The resulting signal is compared with the corresponding synthetic flux. Eventually, we found regions of higher- and lower-than-expected muon flux, that are possibly related to inner features of the target crater.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Carbone_et_al_GJI_2013.PDFMain article9.52 MBAdobe PDF
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

41
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 20

342
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 50

69
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric