Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/8259
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallFornaciai, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallFavalli, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallKarátson, D.; Department of Physical Geography, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungaryen
dc.contributor.authorallTarquini, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallBoschi, E.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-18T07:18:25Zen
dc.date.available2012-10-18T07:18:25Zen
dc.date.issued2012-03-01en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/8259en
dc.description.abstractThe morphometry of a great number of scoria cones, belonging to volcanic fields of various geodynamic settings, has been measured and analyzed, addressing the question whether there is a relation between the prevalent cone shape in a given field and the geodynamic setting of the field itself. Morphometric analysis was carried out on freely downloadable digital elevation models (DEMs). The accuracy of the used DEMs and the associated error in scoria cone morphometry were determined by cross-comparing high-resolution LIDAR-derived DEMs, USGS NED, TINITALY DEM and ASTER GDEM. The 10-m TINITALY/01 and USGS NED DEMs are proven to be suitable for scoria cone morphometry, whereas ASTER GDEM can be used reliably for cones with volume greater than 30 × 106 m3. According to a detailed morphometry of all scoria cones, we propose that the cones related to subductional setting show relatively higher values of Hco/Wco and lower values of Wcr/Wco than the cones related to extensional setting. The detected differences can be imputable to peculiar eruption dynamics resulting in slight but systematic changes in shape, and differences in lithological and sedimentological characteristics that govern post-eruptive erosion. To constrain the pathway of scoria cone erosion, the detected morphometric changes were also interpreted using a simple linear degradation model. Utilizing the obtained simulation results, the inferred initial cone base, and the age of scoria cones, we calculated a diffusion coefficient (K) for several dated cones, which are related to the prevalent climate. Our results, despite the high error associated, allow to assess the median K for all volcanic fields. Due to the complexity of the factors behind, it is not easy to understand if the prevalent shape characterizing a certain volcanic field is due mainly to sin-eruptive or post-eruptive mechanisms; however, our distinction between the two main geodynamic settings may be the first step to decipher these factors.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevier Science Limiteden
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of volcanology and geothermal researchen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/217-218(2012)en
dc.subjectScoria coneen
dc.subjectDigital elevation models (DEMs)en
dc.subjectMorphometryen
dc.subjectVolcanic fielden
dc.subjectCone degradation simulationen
dc.subjectGeodynamic settingen
dc.titleMorphometry of scoria cones, and their relation to geodynamic setting: A DEM-based analysisen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber56-72en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.04. Geology::04.04.03. Geomorphologyen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.99. General or miscellaneousen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.12.012en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico1.10. TTC - Telerilevamentoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextrestricteden
dc.relation.issn0377-0273en
dc.relation.eissn1872-6097en
dc.contributor.authorFornaciai, A.en
dc.contributor.authorFavalli, M.en
dc.contributor.authorKarátson, D.en
dc.contributor.authorTarquini, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBoschi, E.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Physical Geography, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungaryen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Physical Geography, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4829-4928-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7338-6069-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8064-621X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
JVGR_Fornaciai_etal_2012.pdf3.38 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

42
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

317
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

26
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric