Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Authors: ||Palyvos, N.*|
|Title: ||Using geomorphic and biological indicators of coastal uplift for the evaluation of paleoseismicity and|
|Title of journal: ||Geomorphology|
|Issue Date: ||2007|
|Keywords: ||Coastal fault zone|
|Abstract: ||The westernmost part of the Gulf of Corinth (Greece) is an area of very fast extension (~15 mm/yr
according to geodetic measurements) and active normal faulting, accompanied by intense coastal uplift and
high seismicity. This study presents geomorphic and biological evidence of Holocene coastal uplift at the
western extremity of the Gulf, where such evidence was previously unknown. Narrow shore platforms
(benches) and rare notches occur mainly on Holocene littoral conglomerates of uplifting small fan deltas.
They are perhaps the only primary paleoseismic evidence likely to provide information on earthquake
recurrence at coastal faults in the specific part of the Rift system, whereas dated marine fauna can provide
constraints on average Holocene coastal uplift rate.
The types of geomorphic and biological evidence identified are not ideal, and there are limitations and
pitfalls involved in their evaluation. In a first approach, 5 uplifted paleoshorelines may be indentified, at 0.4-
0.7, 1.0-1.3, 1.4-1.7, 2.0-2.3 and 2.8-3.4 m a.m.s.l. They probably formed after 1728 or 2250 Cal. B.P.
(depending on the marine reservoir correction used in the calibration of measured radiocarbon ages). A
most conservative estimate for the average coastal uplift rate during the Late Holocene is 1.6 or 1.9 mm/yr
minimum (with different amounts of reservoir correction). Part of the obtained radiocarbon ages of
Lithophaga sp. allows for much higher Holocene uplift rates, of the order of 3-4 mm/yr, which cannot be
discarded given that similar figures exist in the bibliography on Holocene and Pleistocene uplift at
neighbouring areas. They should best be cross-checked by further studies though.
That the identified paleoshoreline record corresponds to episodes of coastal uplift only, cannot be
demonstrated beyond all doubt by independent evidence, but it appears the most likely interpretation, given
the geological and active-tectonic context and, what is known about eustatic sea-level fluctuations in the
Mediterranean. Proving that the documented uplifts were abrupt (i.e., arguably coseismic), is equally difficult,
but reasonably expected and rather probable. Five earthquakes in the last ca. 2000 yrs on the coastal fault
zone responsible for the uplift, compare well with historical seismicity and the results of recent on-fault
paleoseismological studies at the nearby Eliki fault zone. Exact amounts of coseismic uplift cannot be
determined precisely, unless the rate of uniform ("regional") non-seismic uplift of Northern Peloponnesus at
the specific part of the Corinth Rift is somehow constrained.|
|Appears in Collections:||04.04.01. Earthquake geology and paleoseismology|
Papers Published / Papers in press
Files in This Item:
|GEOMOR-564_small.pdf||1.23 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.