Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2529
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallPodestà, S.; Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoa,en
dc.contributor.authorallResemini, S.; Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoaen
dc.contributor.authorallBindi, D.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallSpallarossa, D.; Dipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle sue Risorse, Università di Genovaen
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T13:04:31Zen
dc.date.available2007-09-20T13:04:31Zen
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2529en
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the results of different numerical analyses (nonlinear dynamic FEM simulations) regarding the monumental buildings in Ripabottoni village (Campobasso, southern Italy), which were damaged by the 2002 Molise earthquake. In particular, the church of S. Maria Assunta, for which typological data and an exhaustive damage survey are available, is taken into account. Some preliminary studies [Spallarossa et al., 2004], which correlate the waveform of the available recordings from aftershocks and the surveyed damage mechanism (due to the crushing of the vertical structural elements), suggested that a feasible explanation for this particular damage pattern does not involve only the intrinsic vulnerability of this type of buildings, but deals also with the high energy content in the high frequency range observed in the vertical component of the seismic events. In order to understand the structural damage patterns surveyed, synthetic accelerograms, representative of the main shock (Ml = 5.4 on 31 October 2002), were computed. The Empirical Green Function (EGF) method was applied to compute the seismic input adopted in the nonlinear dynamic analyses that we performed for the church of S. Maria Assunta. The results confirm that the observed damage pattern cannot totally be put down to the vulnerability of the building, but the particular characteristics of the seismic action played a fundamental role in determining it.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameImperial Collegeen
dc.relation.ispartofJ. Earthq. Eng.en
dc.relation.ispartofseries3 / 10 (2006)en
dc.subjectMonumental buildings;en
dc.subjectnonlinear dynamic simulations;en
dc.subjectvertical ground motion;en
dc.subject2002 Molise earthquake.en
dc.titleInfluence of ground motion characteristics on monumental building damage: the 2002 Molise earthqauke (Southern Italy)en
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber381-409en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.relation.referencesAki, K. [1967] “Scaling law of seismic spectrum,” J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1217–1231. Augliera, P., Dolce, M., Franceschina, G., Frapiccini, M., Gallipoli, M. R., Harabaglia, P., Luzi, L., Masi, A., Marzorati, S., Mucciarelli, M., Pacor, F. and Samela, L. [2004] “Site amplification in the epicentral area of the 31/10/2002 earthquake (Molise, Italy): comparison between damage data, microtremors, weak- and strong-motions,” in Proc. of 13th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Vancouver, 2004, CD-Rom, Paper No. 725. Bernardini, A., (ed.) [2000] Building Vulnerability: Evaluation at National Scale of the Seismic Vulnerability of Ordinary Buildings, CNR-Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Rome, 175 pp (in Italian). Binda, L., Saisi, A. and Tedeschi, C. [2003] “Damage due to high compressive axial force in the pillars of some churches,” Proc. Workshop “Danneggiamento, Conservazione e Manutenzione di Strutture Murarie e Lignee: Diagnosi e Modellazione Con Riferimento Alle Tipologie Costruttive ed Edilizie dei Centri Storici”, Milan (in Italian). Bozorgnia, Y., Niazi, M. and Campbell, K.W. [1995], “Characteristics of free-field vertical ground motion during the northridge earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra 11(4), 515–525. B.U.R.M. [2004] “Handbook for the retrofitting and seismic improvement interventions of the ecclesiastic and monumental buildings,” The Churches — Second Part: Executive Project, 1st September 2004, No. 17 (in Italian). Doglioni, F., Moretti, A. and Petrini, V. [1994] The Churches and the Earthquake. Trieste (ed.) LINT (in Italian). Gambarotta, L. and Lagomarsino, S. [1997] “Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part II: The continuum model and its applications,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 26, 441–462. Geller, R. J. [1976] “Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66, 1501–1523. Gorini, A., Marcucci, S., Marsan, P. and Milana, G. [2004] “Strong motion records of the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake sequence,” Earthquake Spectra 20, S65–S67. Gr¨unthal, G., (ed.) [1998] “European macroseismic scale 1998,” Cahiers du Centre Europ´een de G´eodynamique et de S´eismologie, 15, Luxembourg. Hartzell, S. H. [1978] “Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions,” Geophys, Res. Lett. 5, 1–4. Italian Civil Defence Department [2001] Survey Form for the Monumental Heritage — Damage to Churches, Official bulletin No. 116, 21 May 2001 (in Italian). Irikura, K. [1986] “Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green’s function,” Proc. 7th Japan Earthq. Eng. Symp., pp. 151–156. Isella, L., Podest`a, S., Resemini, S., Pasta, M. and Eva, C. [2004] “Relationship between damage and peak accelerations in Ripabottoni (CB) during the 2002 Molise Earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra 20 (Special Issue I), 119–130. Kamae, K., Bard, P.-Y. and Irikura, K. [1998] “Prediction of strong ground motion at EURO-SEISTEST site using the empirical Green’s function method,” Journal of Seismology 2, 193–207. Kanamori, H. and Anderson, D. L. [1975] “Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1075–1095. Lagomarsino, S. and Podest`a, S. [2004a] “Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 2: statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis,” Earthquake Spectra 20(2), 395–412. Lagomarsino, S. and Podest`a, S. [2004b] “Damage and vulnerability assessment of the churches after the Molise earthquake (2002),” Earthquake Spectra 20 (Special Issue I), 271–283. Lagomarsino, S., Podest`a, S., Cifani, G. and Lemme, A. [2004] “The 31st October 2002 earthquake in Molise (Italy): a new methodology for the damage and the seismic vulnerability survey of the churches,” Proc. of 13th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Vancouver, 2004, CD-Rom, Paper No. 1366. Lew, M. and Hudson, M. B. [1999] “The effects of vertical ground motion on base-isolated buildings systems,” Earthquake Spectra 15(2) Technical notes. Massa, M., Ferretti, G., Cevasco, A., Isella, L. and Eva, C. [2004a] “Analysis of site amplification phenomena derived by microtremors and weak motion recordings: an application in Ripabottoni (Molise, Italy),” Earthquake Spectra 20 (Special Issue I), 107–118. Massa, M., Zolezzi, F., Ferretti, G., Spallarossa, D. and Eva, C. [2004b] “The 2002 Molise seismic sequence: preliminary outcomes,” 23rd National Congress GNGTS, Rome 14–16 December. Mola, E., Tsionis, G., Taucer, F. and Pinto, A. [2003] The Molise (Italy) Earthquake of 31st October and 1st November 2002: Report and Analysis from a Field Mission, JRC-ELSA, EUR 20664 EN. Parolai, S. and Richwalski, S. [2004] “The importance of converted waves in comparing H/V and RSM site response estimates,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 304–313. Rovelli, A., Calderoni, G., Valensise, G. and Milana, G. [2004] “Evidence for low stress drop during the October–November 2002 earthquakes in Molise,” Central-Southern Italy, 23rd National Congress GNGTS, Rome, 14–16 December. SSN [2002] http://www.serviziosismico.it/MONIT/RAN/introduzione.html, Servizio Sismico Nazionale, Italian national accelerometric network. Spallarossa, D., Podest`a, S., Resemini, S., Bindi, D., Frisenda, M., Lagomarsino, S. and Eva, C. [2004] “The Molise Earthquake: Correlation between damage on monumental buildings and ground motion characteristics,” Proc. of the 11th National Congress L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Genoa, January 2004 (in Italian).en
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorPodestà, S.en
dc.contributor.authorResemini, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBindi, D.en
dc.contributor.authorSpallarossa, D.en
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoa,en
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle sue Risorse, Università di Genovaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoa,-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoa-
crisitem.author.deptDipTeRis Università di Genova-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8619-2220-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8021-3908-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
749.pdf3.07 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

135
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

21
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check