Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/16750
Authors: Musacchio, Gemma* 
Saraò, Angela* 
Falsaperla, Susanna* 
Scolobig, Anna* 
Title: A scoping review of seismic risk communication in Europe
Journal: Frontiers in Earth Science 
Series/Report no.: /11 (2023)
Publisher: Frontiers S.A.
Issue Date: 3-Jul-2023
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1155576
URL: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2023.1155576/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Earth_Science&id=1155576
Keywords: Seismic risk
communication
Europe
scoping review
Subject Classification05.08. Risk 
04.06. Seismology 
Abstract: Although earthquakes are a threat in many countries and considerable resources have been invested in safety regulations, communities at risk often lack awareness and preparedness. Risk communication is a key tool for building resilient communities, raising awareness, and increasing preparedness. Over the past 2 decades, seismic risk communication has evolved significantly. This has led to a reorientation from a predominantly “one-way”, top-down communication model to the promotion of new models in which people, their needs, and their participation in disaster risk management are central elements. The 2015–2030 Sendai Framework recommendations, recent disaster experiences and research have highlighted that new models can improve communication effectiveness. In this paper, we critically explore this transition by conducting a scoping review (n=109 publications) of seismic risk communication in Europe. We analyse the approaches, messages, tools, and channels used for seismic risk communication and how they have changed over time. The results reveal that the stated goals of seismic risk communication are, in decreasing order, to share information, raise awareness, change behaviours/beliefs, and increase preparedness. Pupils, students, and citizens are the primary recipients of communication activities. Over the years, two trends have emerged. First, “two-way”, transdisciplinary and bottom-up communication models prevailed over the “one-way” model. Second, communication aimed more at promoting proactive behaviours than just informing the public. Face-to-face, hands-on activities, and serious games are key tools to engage with the public. The results also reveal the emerging role of social media to target different audiences/social groups. Strikingly, only one-fifth of the analysed publications explicitly build on or tests risk communication theories. Future research could focus on comparing practices across countries and risks (e.g., earthquakes and floods) and on innovating communication theories and methodologies, especially by incorporating the role of information technologies and social media.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Musacchio&al-2023_Seismic_risk_communication_in_Europe_from-2000-to-2022.pdfOpen Access Published file3.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Supplementary_material.docxSupplementary material of the article78.27 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

75
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric