Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/15278
Authors: Rollins, Kyle* 
Amoroso, Sara* 
Andersen, Paul* 
Tonni, Laura* 
Wissmann, Kord* 
Title: Liquefaction Mitigation of Silty Sands Using Rammed Aggregate Piers Based on Blast-Induced Liquefaction Testing
Journal: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 
Series/Report no.: 9/147 (2021)
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Issue Date: 2021
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002563
Abstract: To investigate the liquefaction mitigation capability of rammed aggregate piers (RAP) in silty sand, blast liquefaction testing was performed at a soil profile treated with a full-scale RAP group relative to an untreated soil profile. The RAP group consisted of 16 piers in a 4 × 4 arrangement at 2 m center-to-center spacing extending to a depth of 9.5 m. Blasting around the untreated area induced liquefaction (ru ≈ 1.0) from a 3 to 11 m depth, producing several large sand boils and causing a settlement of 10 cm. In contrast, the installation of the RAP group reduced excess pore water pressure (ru ≈ 0.75), eliminated sand ejecta, and reduced the average settlement to between 2 and 5 cm when subjected to the same blast charges. Although the liquefaction-induced settlement in the untreated area could be accurately estimated using an integrated cone penetration test (CPT)-based settlement approach, settlement in theRAPtreated area was significantly overestimated with the same approach, even after considering RAP treatment-induced densification. Analyses indicate that settlement after RAP treatment could be successfully estimated from liquefaction-induced compression of the sand and RAP acting as a composite material. This test program identifies a mechanism that explains how the settlement was reduced for the RAP group despite the elevated ru values in the silty sands that are often difficult to improve with vibratory methods.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Rollins et al. 2021.pdfRestricted Paper4.93 MBAdobe PDF
Show full item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Download(s)

1
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric