Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/13658
Authors: Gerstenberger, Matthew C.* 
Marzocchi, Warner* 
Allen, Trevor* 
Pagani, Marco* 
Adams, John* 
Danciu, Laurentiu* 
Field, Edward* 
Fujiwara, H* 
Luco, Nicolas* 
Ma, K.‐F.* 
Meletti, Carlo* 
Petersen, Mark D.* 
Title: Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis at Regional and National Scales: State of the Art and Future Challenges
Journal: Reviews of Geophysics 
Series/Report no.: /58 (2020)
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
Issue Date: 10-Mar-2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019RG000653
URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019RG000653
Abstract: Seismic hazard modeling is a multidisciplinary science that aims to forecast earthquake occurrence and its resultant ground shaking. Such models consist of a probabilistic framework that quantifies uncertainty across a complex system; typically, this includes at least two model components developed from Earth science: seismic source and ground motion models. Although there is no scientific prescription for the forecast length, the most common probabilistic seismic hazard analyses consider forecasting windows of 30 to 50 years, which are typically an engineering demand for building code purposes. These types of analyses are the topic of this review paper. Although the core methods and assumptions of seismic hazard modeling have largely remained unchanged for more than 50 years, we review the most recent initiatives, which face the difficult task of meeting both the increasingly sophisticated demands of society and keeping pace with advances in scientific understanding. A need for more accurate and spatially precise hazard forecasting must be balanced with increased quantification of uncertainty and new challenges such as moving from time‐independent hazard to forecasts that are time dependent and specific to the time period of interest. Meeting these challenges requires the development of science‐driven models, which integrate all information available, the adoption of proper mathematical frameworks to quantify the different types of uncertainties in the hazard model, and the development of a proper testing phase of the model to quantify its consistency and skill. We review the state of the art of the National Seismic Hazard Modeling and how the most innovative approaches try to address future challenges.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2019RG000653.pdfFull text7.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Feb 4, 2021

Page view(s)

345
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Download(s)

51
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric