Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/13144
Authors: Di Genova, Danilo* 
Sicola, Stefania* 
Romano, Claudia* 
Vona, Alessandro* 
Fanara, Sara* 
Spina, Laura* 
Title: Effect of iron and nanolites on Raman spectra of volcanic glasses: A reassessment of existing strategies to estimate the water content
Journal: Chemical Geology 
Series/Report no.: /475 (2017)
Issue Date: 2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.10.035
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254117306083
Abstract: The effect of iron content and iron nanolites on Raman spectra of hydrous geologically-relevant glasses is presented. Current procedures to estimate the water content using Raman spectra were tested to explore potential effects of iron content, its oxidation state, and nanolites on models' reliability. A chemical interval spanning from basalt to rhyolite, including alkali- and iron-rich compositions, with water content up to 5.6 wt% was investigated using two spectrometers. When considering nanolite-free samples, the area of the band at 3550 cm−1 linearly correlates with the sample water content regardless of chemical composition. Using this approach, data were reproduced with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of ~ 0.15 wt%. Depending on the sample chemistry, water content, and acquisition conditions the laser-induced sample oxidation led to underestimating the water content up to ~ 90% with a long acquisition time (26 min). Normalising the water band region to the silicate band region minimises such a limitation. The area ratio between these bands linearly correlates with the water content and the use of different baseline procedures does not remove the dependence of such a correlation by the iron content and its oxidation state. With this procedure, data were reproduced with a RMSE of ~ 0.16 wt%. For both approaches, the presence of iron nanolites may result in underestimating the water content.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
article.pdf2.09 MBAdobe PDF
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

49
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Download(s)

5
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric