Relationships between ground motion parameters and macroseismic intensity for Italy
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
6T. Studi di pericolosità sismica e da maremoto
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Issue/vol(year)
/18 (2020)
Publisher
Springer
Pages (printed)
5143–5164
Date Issued
January 2020
Subjects
Abstract
The relation between macroseismic intensity and ground shaking makes it possible to transform instrumental Ground Motion Parameters (GMPs) in macroseismic intensity and vice versa, and is therefore useful for making comparisons between estimates of seismic hazard determined in terms of GMPs and macroseismic intensity, and for other engineering and seismological applications.
Empirical relationships between macroseismic intensity and different recorded GMPs for the Italian territory are presented in this paper. The coefficients are calibrated using a dataset of horizontal geometrical mean GMPs, i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), spectral acceleration (SA) at 0.2, 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 s from the ITalian ACcelerometric Archive (ITACA; Luzi et al. 2019), and macroseismic intensity at Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg (MCS) scale from the database DBMI15 (Locati et al. 2019). A dataset was obtained that corresponds to 240 pairs of macroseismic intensity-GMPs from 67 Italian earthquakes in the time window 1972-2016 with moment magnitude ranging from 4.2 to 6.8 and macroseismic intensity in the range [2, 10-11].
The final dataset is developed correlating strong motion stations and macroseismic intensity observations generally within 2 km from each other, but the associations is manually validated through the expert opinion. The adopted functional form is non-linear predicting macroseismic intensity as a function of LogGMPs and vice versa by performing separate regressions. The set of empirical conversion relationships GMP-I MCS -GMP and the associated standard deviations are compared with previous models.
The results of an illustrative PSHA, obtained using a new seismogenic zonation (Santulin et al. 2017), proposed as one of the inputs of the new Italian seismic hazard model (Meletti et al. 2017), are used to analyse and compare seismic hazard assessment in terms of PGA and the related seismic hazard map in terms of macroseismic intensity (MCS) obtained using the empirical relationships here proposed for the PGA.
Empirical relationships between macroseismic intensity and different recorded GMPs for the Italian territory are presented in this paper. The coefficients are calibrated using a dataset of horizontal geometrical mean GMPs, i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), spectral acceleration (SA) at 0.2, 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 s from the ITalian ACcelerometric Archive (ITACA; Luzi et al. 2019), and macroseismic intensity at Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg (MCS) scale from the database DBMI15 (Locati et al. 2019). A dataset was obtained that corresponds to 240 pairs of macroseismic intensity-GMPs from 67 Italian earthquakes in the time window 1972-2016 with moment magnitude ranging from 4.2 to 6.8 and macroseismic intensity in the range [2, 10-11].
The final dataset is developed correlating strong motion stations and macroseismic intensity observations generally within 2 km from each other, but the associations is manually validated through the expert opinion. The adopted functional form is non-linear predicting macroseismic intensity as a function of LogGMPs and vice versa by performing separate regressions. The set of empirical conversion relationships GMP-I MCS -GMP and the associated standard deviations are compared with previous models.
The results of an illustrative PSHA, obtained using a new seismogenic zonation (Santulin et al. 2017), proposed as one of the inputs of the new Italian seismic hazard model (Meletti et al. 2017), are used to analyse and compare seismic hazard assessment in terms of PGA and the related seismic hazard map in terms of macroseismic intensity (MCS) obtained using the empirical relationships here proposed for the PGA.
References
Akkar S, Sandikkaya MA, Bommer JJ (2014) Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthquake Eng 12:359–387 Albarello D, D’Amico V (2008) Testing probabilistic seismic hazard estimates by comparison with observations: An example in Italy. Geophys J Int 175:1088-1094 Allen TI, Wald DJ (2009) Evaluation of ground-motion modelling techniques for use in global ShakeMap: a critique of instrumental ground motion prediction equations, peak ground motion to macroseismic intensity conversions, and macroseismic intensity predictions in different tectonic settings. Open-File Report 2009-1047, U.S. Geological Survey, p 114 Ambraseys NN (1975) The correlation of intensity with ground motion. Proc of the XIV General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Trieste, 16-22 September 1974, 335-341 Atkinson GM, Kaka SI (2007) Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the Central United States and California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(4):1350–1354 Atkinson GM, Sonley E (2000) Empirical Relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity and Response Spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 90(2):537-544 Bilal M, Askan A (2014) Relationships between Felt Intensity and Recorded Ground-Motion Parameters for Turkey. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(1):484–496 Bindi D, Kotha S-R, Weatherill G, Lanzano G, Luzi L, Cotton F (2018) The pan-European Engineering Strong Motion (ESM) flatfile: consistency check via residual analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-0180466-x Boatwright J, Thywissen K, Seekins L (2001) Correlation of Ground Motion and Intensity for the 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 91(4):739-752 Boschi E, Favalli P, Frugoni F, Scalera G, Smriglio S (1995) Mappa Massima Intensità Macrosismica risentita in Italia.
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica, Roma Caprio M, Tarigan B, Worden CB, Wiemer S, Wald DJ (2015) Ground motion to intensity conversion equations (GMICEs): A global relationships and evaluation of regional dependency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105(3):14761490 Chiaruttini C, Siro L. (1981) The correlation of peak ground horizontal acceleration with magnitude, distance, and seismic intensity for Friuli and Ancona, Italy, and the Alpide Belt. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 71(6):1993-2009 Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583-1606 Cua G, Wald DJ, Allen TI, Garcia D, Worden CB, Gerstenberger M, Lin K, Marano K (2010) Best Practices for Using Macroseismic Intensity and Ground Motion Intensity Conversion Equations for Hazard and Loss Models in GEM1. GEM Technical Report 2010-4, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, 59p.
Decanini L, Gavarini C, Mollaioli F (1995) Proposta di definizione delle relazioni tra intensità macrosismica e parametri del moto del suolo. 7° Convegno Nazionale L’ingegneria sismica in Italia, Siena, 1:63 -72 Du K, Ding B, Luo H, Sun J (2019) Relationship between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Macroseismic Intensity in Western China. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(1):284-297 Faccioli E, Cauzzi C (2006) Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios estimated from instrumentally based correlations. Proceedings First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, paper number 569 Faenza L, Michelini A (2010) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophys J Int 180:1138-1152. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04467.x Faenza L, Michelini A (2011) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion spectral accelerations (SAs) in Italy. Geophys J Int 186:1415-1430 Fujimoto K, Midorikawa S (2005) Empirical method for estimating J.M.A. instrumental seismic intensity from ground motion parameters using strong motion records during recent major earthquakes. Regional Sage Society Dissertation Collection, No 7 (in Japanese).
Galli O, Peronace E, Tertulliani A (2016) Rapporto sugli effetti macrosismici del terremoto del 24 agosto 2016 di Amatrice in scala MCS. Rapporto congiunto DPC, CNR-IGAG, INGV, 15pp. 10.5281/zenodo.161323 (in Italian) Galli P, Castenetto S, Peronace E (2017) The macroseismic intensity distribution of the 30 october 2016 earthquake in Central Italy (Mw6.6): seismotectonic implications. Tectonics 36, 2179-2191. 10.1002/2017TC004583 .
Gomez Capera AA (2006) Seismic hazard map for the Italian territory using macroseismic data. Earth Sci Res J 10(2):6790. ISSN. 1794-6190.
Gomez Capera AA, Albarello D, Gasperini P (2007) Aggiornamento delle relazioni fra l’intensità macrosismica e PGA.
Technical report, Progetto S1, Task 2, deliverable D11, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Milano-Pavia, 27p. (http://esse1.mi.ingv.it/d11.html) Accessed Dec 2019 (in Italian) Gomez Capera AA, D’Amico V, Meletti C, Rovida A, Albarello D (2010) Seismic hazard in terms of macroseismic data intensity in Italy: a critical analysis from the comparison of different computational procedures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4):614-1631
20 Gomez Capera AA, Locati M, Fiorini E, Bazurro P, Luzi L, Massa M, Puglia R, Santulin M (2015) D3.1 Macroseismic and ground motion: site specific conversion rules. DPC-INGV-S2 Project 2015, Deliverable 3.1, https://sites.google.com/site/ingvdpc2014progettos2/deliverables/. Accessed Dec 2019 Gomez Capera AA, Santulin M, D’Amico M, D’Amico V, Locati M, Luzi L, Massa M, Puglia R (2018) Macroseismic intensity to ground motion empirical relationships for Italy. Proceedings, 37° Convegno Nazionale GNGTS , Bologna (Italy) 19-21 Nov 2018, pp 289-291 http://www3.ogs.trieste.it/gngts/files/2018/S21/Riassunti/Gomez.pdf Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15, Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg. ISBN:2-87977-008-4 Kaka SI, Atkinson GM (2004). Relationships between Instrumental Ground-Motion Parameters and Modified Mercalli Intensity in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5):1728-1736.
Kaestli P, Faeh D (2006) Rapid estimation of macroseismic effects and ShakeMaps using macroseismic data.
Proceedings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneve, Switzerland 10pp. Lanzano G, Puglia R, Russo E, Luzi L, Bindi D, Cotton F, D'Amico M, Felicetta C, Pacor F & ORFEUS WG5 (2018a) ESM strong-motion flat-file 2018. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), HelmholtzZentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Observatories & Research Facilities for European Seismology (ORFEUS). PID: 11099/ESM_flatfile_2018 Lanzano G, Sgobba S, Luzi L, Puglia R, Pacor F, Felicetta C, D’Amico M, Cotton F, Bindi D (2018b). The pan-European Engineering Strong Motion (ESM) flatfile: compilation criteria and data statistics. Bull Earthquake Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0480-z Locati M, Camassi R, Stucchi M (a cura di) (2011) DBMI11, la versione 2011 del Database Macrosismico Italiano. Milano, Bologna, 10.6092/INGV.IT -DBMI11 Locati M, Gomez Capera AA, Puglia R, Santulin M (2017) Rosetta, a tool for linking accelerometric recording and macroseismic observations: description and applications. Bull Earthq Eng 15(6):2429-2443. doi:10.1007/s10518016-9955-y Locati M, Camassi R, Rovida A, Ercolani E, Bernardini F, Castelli V, Caracciolo C H, Tertulliani A, Rossi A, Azzaro R, D’Amico S, Conte S, Rocchetti E, Antonucci A (2019) Database Macrosismico Italiano (DBMI15), versione 2.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). 10.13127/DBMI/DBMI15.2 Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F, Sabetta F (2008) Itaca (Italian Accelerometric Archive): a web portal for the dissemination of Italian strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):716–722 Luzi L, Puglia R, Russo E, ORFEUS WG5 (2016) Engineering Strong Motion Database, version 1.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Observatories & Research Facilities for European Seismology. 10.13127/ESM Luzi L, Pacor F, Puglia R (2019). Italian Accelerometric Archive v3.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Dipartimento della Protezione Civile Nazionale. 10.13127/itaca.3.0 Margottini C, Molin D, Narcisi B, Serva L (1987) Intensity vs. acceleration: Italian data. Proceedings of the Workshop on Historical Seismicity of Central-Eastern Mediterranean Region. ENEA-IAEA, Roma, pp. 213-226 Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: A new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33(1):45-58.
Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Nicodemo G, Manfredi V (2020) Correlations between macroseismic intensity estimations and ground motion measures of seismic events. Bull Earthq Eng 10.1007/s10518-019-00782-2 Meletti C, Marzocchi W, Albarello D, D’Amico V, Luzi L, Martinelli F, Pace B, Pignone M, Rovida A, Visini F, the MPS16 Working Group (2017) The Italian seismic hazard model. Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake, Santiago Chile, 9-13 Jan 2017, paper N 747 Michelini A, Faenza L, Lauciani V, Malagnini L (2008) Shakemap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):689698 Molin D, Stucchi M, Valensise G (1996) Massime intensità macrosismiche osservate nei comuni Italiani. Elaborato per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile. https://emidius.mi.ingv.it/GNDT/IMAX/max_int_oss.html. Accessed Dec 2019 (in Italian) Musson R.M.W., Grünthal G., Stucchi M. (2010) The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales. JOSE 14(2):413428. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10950-009-9172-009-9172-0
Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H, Silva V, Henshaw P, Butler L, Nastasi M, Panzeri L, Simionato M, Vigano D (2014) OpenQuake-engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692-702 Panza GF, Cazzaro R, Vaccari F (1997) Correlation between macroseismic intensities and seismic ground motion
parameters. Ann Geophys 40(5):1371-1382 Panjamani A, Bajaj K, Moustafa SSR, Al-Arifi NSN (2016) Relationship between intensity and recorded ground-motion
and spectral parameters for the Himalaya region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(4):1672-1689 Ritchter C F (1958) Elementary Seismology. W H Freeman and Company, San Francisco Rovida A, Locati M, Camassi R, Lolli, B, Gasperini P (2019) Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani (CPTI15),
versione 2.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). https://doi.org/10.13127/CPTI/CPTI15.2
21 Santulin M, Tamaro A, Rebez A, Slejko D, Sani F, Martelli L, Bonini M, Corti G, Poli ME, Zanferrari A, Marchesini A, Busetti M, Dal Cin M, Spallarossa D, Barani S, Scafidi D, Barreca G, Monaco C (2017) Seismogenic zonation as a branch of the logic tree for the new Italian seismic hazard map - MPS16: a preliminary outline. B Geofis Teor Appl 58(4):313-342
Sieberg A (1930) The earthquake geology (Geologie der Erdbeb en). Handbuch der Geophysik 2(4):550–555 (in
German)
Slejko D, Peruzza L, Rebez A (1998) The seismic hazard maps of Italy. Ann Geophys 41(2):183-214 Sokolov VY, Chernov YK (1998) On the correlation of Seismic Intensity with Fourier amplitude spectra. Earthq Spectra 14:679-694 Stucchi M et alii. (2007) DBMI04, il database delle osservazioni macrosismiche dei terremoti italiani utilizzate per la compilazione del catalogo parametrico CPTI04. Quaderni di Geofisica, 49. http://portale. ingv.it/produzionescientifica/quaderni-di-geofisica/archivio/resolveUid/ 0c549ba6165e5d96636aba24f3677c17. (in Italian) Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V, Crowley H, Calvi GM, Boschi E (2011) Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian Building Code. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 101(4):1885-1911. 10.1785/0120100130 Theodulis NP, Papazachos BC (1992) Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitude-distance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquake in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:387-402 Trifunac M, Westermo B (1977) A note on the correlation of frequency-dependent duration of strong earthquake ground motion with the Modified Mercalli intensity and the geologic conditions at the recording stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67(3): 917-927 Trifunac M (1991) Empirical scaling of Fourier spectrum amplitudes of recorded strong earthquake acceleration in terms of Modified Mercalli Intensity, local conditions and depth of sediments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 10(1):65-72 Trifunac M, Lee VW (1992) A note on scaling peak acceleration, velocity and displacement of strong earthquake shaking by Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) and site soil and geologic conditions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:101-110 Tselentis G, Danciu L (2008) Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and engineering groundmotion parameters in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(4):1863–1875 Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relations between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15(3):557-564 Wald DJ, Worden CB, Quitoriano V, Pankow KL (2006) ShakeMap manual, technical manual, users guide, and software guide, Tech. rep., U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/12A01/ Accessed Dec 2019 Yih-Min W, Ta-liang T, Tzay-Chyn S, Nai-Chi H (2003) Relation between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity and Intensity in Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 93(1):386-396 Zanini MA, Hofer L, Faleschini F (2019) Reversible ground motion-to-intensity conversion equations based on the EMS98 scale. Eng Struct 180:310-320
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica, Roma Caprio M, Tarigan B, Worden CB, Wiemer S, Wald DJ (2015) Ground motion to intensity conversion equations (GMICEs): A global relationships and evaluation of regional dependency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105(3):14761490 Chiaruttini C, Siro L. (1981) The correlation of peak ground horizontal acceleration with magnitude, distance, and seismic intensity for Friuli and Ancona, Italy, and the Alpide Belt. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 71(6):1993-2009 Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583-1606 Cua G, Wald DJ, Allen TI, Garcia D, Worden CB, Gerstenberger M, Lin K, Marano K (2010) Best Practices for Using Macroseismic Intensity and Ground Motion Intensity Conversion Equations for Hazard and Loss Models in GEM1. GEM Technical Report 2010-4, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, 59p.
Decanini L, Gavarini C, Mollaioli F (1995) Proposta di definizione delle relazioni tra intensità macrosismica e parametri del moto del suolo. 7° Convegno Nazionale L’ingegneria sismica in Italia, Siena, 1:63 -72 Du K, Ding B, Luo H, Sun J (2019) Relationship between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Macroseismic Intensity in Western China. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(1):284-297 Faccioli E, Cauzzi C (2006) Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios estimated from instrumentally based correlations. Proceedings First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, paper number 569 Faenza L, Michelini A (2010) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophys J Int 180:1138-1152. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04467.x Faenza L, Michelini A (2011) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion spectral accelerations (SAs) in Italy. Geophys J Int 186:1415-1430 Fujimoto K, Midorikawa S (2005) Empirical method for estimating J.M.A. instrumental seismic intensity from ground motion parameters using strong motion records during recent major earthquakes. Regional Sage Society Dissertation Collection, No 7 (in Japanese).
Galli O, Peronace E, Tertulliani A (2016) Rapporto sugli effetti macrosismici del terremoto del 24 agosto 2016 di Amatrice in scala MCS. Rapporto congiunto DPC, CNR-IGAG, INGV, 15pp. 10.5281/zenodo.161323 (in Italian) Galli P, Castenetto S, Peronace E (2017) The macroseismic intensity distribution of the 30 october 2016 earthquake in Central Italy (Mw6.6): seismotectonic implications. Tectonics 36, 2179-2191. 10.1002/2017TC004583 .
Gomez Capera AA (2006) Seismic hazard map for the Italian territory using macroseismic data. Earth Sci Res J 10(2):6790. ISSN. 1794-6190.
Gomez Capera AA, Albarello D, Gasperini P (2007) Aggiornamento delle relazioni fra l’intensità macrosismica e PGA.
Technical report, Progetto S1, Task 2, deliverable D11, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Milano-Pavia, 27p. (http://esse1.mi.ingv.it/d11.html) Accessed Dec 2019 (in Italian) Gomez Capera AA, D’Amico V, Meletti C, Rovida A, Albarello D (2010) Seismic hazard in terms of macroseismic data intensity in Italy: a critical analysis from the comparison of different computational procedures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4):614-1631
20 Gomez Capera AA, Locati M, Fiorini E, Bazurro P, Luzi L, Massa M, Puglia R, Santulin M (2015) D3.1 Macroseismic and ground motion: site specific conversion rules. DPC-INGV-S2 Project 2015, Deliverable 3.1, https://sites.google.com/site/ingvdpc2014progettos2/deliverables/. Accessed Dec 2019 Gomez Capera AA, Santulin M, D’Amico M, D’Amico V, Locati M, Luzi L, Massa M, Puglia R (2018) Macroseismic intensity to ground motion empirical relationships for Italy. Proceedings, 37° Convegno Nazionale GNGTS , Bologna (Italy) 19-21 Nov 2018, pp 289-291 http://www3.ogs.trieste.it/gngts/files/2018/S21/Riassunti/Gomez.pdf Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15, Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg. ISBN:2-87977-008-4 Kaka SI, Atkinson GM (2004). Relationships between Instrumental Ground-Motion Parameters and Modified Mercalli Intensity in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5):1728-1736.
Kaestli P, Faeh D (2006) Rapid estimation of macroseismic effects and ShakeMaps using macroseismic data.
Proceedings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneve, Switzerland 10pp. Lanzano G, Puglia R, Russo E, Luzi L, Bindi D, Cotton F, D'Amico M, Felicetta C, Pacor F & ORFEUS WG5 (2018a) ESM strong-motion flat-file 2018. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), HelmholtzZentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Observatories & Research Facilities for European Seismology (ORFEUS). PID: 11099/ESM_flatfile_2018 Lanzano G, Sgobba S, Luzi L, Puglia R, Pacor F, Felicetta C, D’Amico M, Cotton F, Bindi D (2018b). The pan-European Engineering Strong Motion (ESM) flatfile: compilation criteria and data statistics. Bull Earthquake Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0480-z Locati M, Camassi R, Stucchi M (a cura di) (2011) DBMI11, la versione 2011 del Database Macrosismico Italiano. Milano, Bologna, 10.6092/INGV.IT -DBMI11 Locati M, Gomez Capera AA, Puglia R, Santulin M (2017) Rosetta, a tool for linking accelerometric recording and macroseismic observations: description and applications. Bull Earthq Eng 15(6):2429-2443. doi:10.1007/s10518016-9955-y Locati M, Camassi R, Rovida A, Ercolani E, Bernardini F, Castelli V, Caracciolo C H, Tertulliani A, Rossi A, Azzaro R, D’Amico S, Conte S, Rocchetti E, Antonucci A (2019) Database Macrosismico Italiano (DBMI15), versione 2.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). 10.13127/DBMI/DBMI15.2 Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F, Sabetta F (2008) Itaca (Italian Accelerometric Archive): a web portal for the dissemination of Italian strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):716–722 Luzi L, Puglia R, Russo E, ORFEUS WG5 (2016) Engineering Strong Motion Database, version 1.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Observatories & Research Facilities for European Seismology. 10.13127/ESM Luzi L, Pacor F, Puglia R (2019). Italian Accelerometric Archive v3.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Dipartimento della Protezione Civile Nazionale. 10.13127/itaca.3.0 Margottini C, Molin D, Narcisi B, Serva L (1987) Intensity vs. acceleration: Italian data. Proceedings of the Workshop on Historical Seismicity of Central-Eastern Mediterranean Region. ENEA-IAEA, Roma, pp. 213-226 Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: A new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33(1):45-58.
Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Nicodemo G, Manfredi V (2020) Correlations between macroseismic intensity estimations and ground motion measures of seismic events. Bull Earthq Eng 10.1007/s10518-019-00782-2 Meletti C, Marzocchi W, Albarello D, D’Amico V, Luzi L, Martinelli F, Pace B, Pignone M, Rovida A, Visini F, the MPS16 Working Group (2017) The Italian seismic hazard model. Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake, Santiago Chile, 9-13 Jan 2017, paper N 747 Michelini A, Faenza L, Lauciani V, Malagnini L (2008) Shakemap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):689698 Molin D, Stucchi M, Valensise G (1996) Massime intensità macrosismiche osservate nei comuni Italiani. Elaborato per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile. https://emidius.mi.ingv.it/GNDT/IMAX/max_int_oss.html. Accessed Dec 2019 (in Italian) Musson R.M.W., Grünthal G., Stucchi M. (2010) The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales. JOSE 14(2):413428. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10950-009-9172-009-9172-0
Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H, Silva V, Henshaw P, Butler L, Nastasi M, Panzeri L, Simionato M, Vigano D (2014) OpenQuake-engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692-702 Panza GF, Cazzaro R, Vaccari F (1997) Correlation between macroseismic intensities and seismic ground motion
parameters. Ann Geophys 40(5):1371-1382 Panjamani A, Bajaj K, Moustafa SSR, Al-Arifi NSN (2016) Relationship between intensity and recorded ground-motion
and spectral parameters for the Himalaya region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(4):1672-1689 Ritchter C F (1958) Elementary Seismology. W H Freeman and Company, San Francisco Rovida A, Locati M, Camassi R, Lolli, B, Gasperini P (2019) Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani (CPTI15),
versione 2.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). https://doi.org/10.13127/CPTI/CPTI15.2
21 Santulin M, Tamaro A, Rebez A, Slejko D, Sani F, Martelli L, Bonini M, Corti G, Poli ME, Zanferrari A, Marchesini A, Busetti M, Dal Cin M, Spallarossa D, Barani S, Scafidi D, Barreca G, Monaco C (2017) Seismogenic zonation as a branch of the logic tree for the new Italian seismic hazard map - MPS16: a preliminary outline. B Geofis Teor Appl 58(4):313-342
Sieberg A (1930) The earthquake geology (Geologie der Erdbeb en). Handbuch der Geophysik 2(4):550–555 (in
German)
Slejko D, Peruzza L, Rebez A (1998) The seismic hazard maps of Italy. Ann Geophys 41(2):183-214 Sokolov VY, Chernov YK (1998) On the correlation of Seismic Intensity with Fourier amplitude spectra. Earthq Spectra 14:679-694 Stucchi M et alii. (2007) DBMI04, il database delle osservazioni macrosismiche dei terremoti italiani utilizzate per la compilazione del catalogo parametrico CPTI04. Quaderni di Geofisica, 49. http://portale. ingv.it/produzionescientifica/quaderni-di-geofisica/archivio/resolveUid/ 0c549ba6165e5d96636aba24f3677c17. (in Italian) Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V, Crowley H, Calvi GM, Boschi E (2011) Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian Building Code. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 101(4):1885-1911. 10.1785/0120100130 Theodulis NP, Papazachos BC (1992) Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitude-distance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquake in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:387-402 Trifunac M, Westermo B (1977) A note on the correlation of frequency-dependent duration of strong earthquake ground motion with the Modified Mercalli intensity and the geologic conditions at the recording stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67(3): 917-927 Trifunac M (1991) Empirical scaling of Fourier spectrum amplitudes of recorded strong earthquake acceleration in terms of Modified Mercalli Intensity, local conditions and depth of sediments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 10(1):65-72 Trifunac M, Lee VW (1992) A note on scaling peak acceleration, velocity and displacement of strong earthquake shaking by Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) and site soil and geologic conditions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:101-110 Tselentis G, Danciu L (2008) Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and engineering groundmotion parameters in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(4):1863–1875 Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relations between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15(3):557-564 Wald DJ, Worden CB, Quitoriano V, Pankow KL (2006) ShakeMap manual, technical manual, users guide, and software guide, Tech. rep., U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/12A01/ Accessed Dec 2019 Yih-Min W, Ta-liang T, Tzay-Chyn S, Nai-Chi H (2003) Relation between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity and Intensity in Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 93(1):386-396 Zanini MA, Hofer L, Faleschini F (2019) Reversible ground motion-to-intensity conversion equations based on the EMS98 scale. Eng Struct 180:310-320
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
BEEE-S-20-00050.pdf
Description
in rev.
Size
5.58 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
03d02c38ec95a337eb7e7bffa1385b44