Response to comment by Hilgen et al.: Integrated stratigraphy and pitfalls of automated tuning

First of all we thank Hilgen and co-authors for their interest in our manuscript. Here we provide an answer to their comment in order to prove the robustness of our conclusions, despite the tuning process that we performed on the original MEDSTACK from Lourens et al. (2004) and Wang et al. (2010).

Colleoni, F., Masina, S., Negri, A., Marzocchi, A., 2012. Plio–Pleistocene high–low latitude climate interplay: A Mediterranean point of view. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 319–320, 35–44.
Hilgen, F.J., 1991. Extension of the astronomically calibrated (polarity) to the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 107, 349–368.
Lisiecki, L., Raymo, M., 2005. A Pliocene–Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003.
Lourens, L.J., Hilgen, F.J., Laskar, J., Shackleton, N.J., Wilson, D., 2004. The Neogene period. In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Smith, A.G. (Eds.), A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 409–440.
Wang, P., Tian, J., Lourens, L., 2010. Obscuring of long eccentricity cyclicity in Pleis- tocene oceanic carbon isotope records. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 290, 319–330.