Conservation and Enhancement of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Site between History, Geology and Emerging Crowd-Based Digital Technologies

Attention to the condition assessment and conservation of cultural heritage is increasing
due to growing sensitivity to the preservation of the built and natural environment and awareness
of the risks associated with natural hazards. In this context, a comprehensive approach to the
conservation and valorization of cultural heritage requires the combined action of different skills to
achieve reliable assessment of the conditions of valuable assets and sites based on qualitative and
quantitative indicators. This paper explores the issues of conservation and sustainable management
of archaeological sites, considering humanistic and technical aspects. It reviews the current rules and
practices concerning the maintenance and administration of archaeological heritage and outlines the
implementation of a novel procedure, based on low-cost tools, to assess and describe the current
condition of archaeological assets. Specific attention is paid to the interaction between experts
and researchers operating in both humanistic and technical fields and to the knowledge and data
contribution available on modern web-based platforms to implement reliable and low-cost data
acquisition for the development of worthwhile plans for the conservation and enhancement of
cultural heritage. The Samnite complex of Pietrabbondante, Molise, South Italy, is employed to apply
and check the proposed tools in the real world

1. Legislative Decree 42. Cultural and Landscape Heritage Code; G.U. n. 45 24 February, 2004; Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato
S.p.A.: Rome, Italy, 2004. (In Italian)
2. D’Agostino, S.; Giuliani, C.F.; Conforto, M.L.; Guidoboni, E. Recommendations for Drawing Up Projects and Carrying Out Interventions
for the Conservation of Archaeological Built Heritage; Cuzzolin: Napoli, Italy, 2009. (In Italian)
3. Palumbo, G. Threats and Challenges to the Archaeological Heritage in the Mediterranean. In Management Planning for Archaeologi cal Sites. An International Workshop Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University 19–22 May 2000
Corinth Greece; Teutonico, J.M., Palumbo, G., Eds.; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 3–10.
4. Pavlova, I.; Makarigakis, A.; Depret, T.; Jomelli, V. Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness
at world heritage sites. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 28, 151–157. [CrossRef]
5. Gizzi, F.T. Identifying geological and geotechnical influences that threaten historical sites: A method to evaluate the usefulness of
data already available. J. Cult. Herit. 2008, 9, 302–310. [CrossRef]
6. Iadanza, C.; Cacace, C.; Del Conte, S.; Spizzichino, D.; Cespa, S.; Triglia, A. Cultural heritage, landslide risk and remote sensing
in Italy. In Landslide Science and Practice: Risk Assessment, Management and Mitigation; Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K., Eds.;
Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 6, pp. 491–499.
7. Parisi, F.; Augenti, N. Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Eng. Fail.
Anal. 2013, 34, 735–760. [CrossRef]
8. Spizzichino, D.; Cacace, C.; Iadanza, C.; Trigilia, A. Beni culturali e rischio idrogeologico in Italia. Boll. Ist. Super. Conserv. Ed.
Restauro 2013, 27, 25–35.
9. Quattrone, G. Risk Analysis and Vulnerability Assessment of Archaeological Areas for the Preventive Conservation. In Digital
Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science;
Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Moropoulou, A., Hagedorn-Saupe, M., Fresa, A., Liestøl, G., Rajcic, V., Grussenmeyer, P., Eds.; Springer:
Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 157–168.
10. Del Giudice, V.; De Paola, P.; Forte, F. Evaluation methodologies of earthquake damages to cultural heritage. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res.
2018, 13, 1647–1653.
11. ICOMOS. The Venice Charter. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of monuments and Sites. 1964.
Available online: https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2020).
12. ICOMOS. Charter for the Protection and Management of Archaeological Heritage. 1990. Available online: https://www.icomos.
org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/arch_e.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2020).
13. ICOMOS. Salalah Guidelines for the Management of Public Archaeological Sites. 2017. Available online: https://www.
icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/GA2017_6-3-3_SalalahGuidelines_EN_adopted-15122017.pdf (accessed on 26
October 2020).
14. UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. 2019. Available online: http:
//whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/ (accessed on 26 October 2020).
15. ISO 13822; Bases for Design of Structures—Assessment of Existing Structures; ISO TC98/SC2. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2010.
16. MIBACT—Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali; Generale, S. (Eds.) Guidelines for the Assessment and the Mitigation of Seismic
risk of Cultural Heritage with Reference to Italian NTC2008; Gangemi Editore: Roma, Italy, 2011. (In Italian)
17. Canuti, P.; Margottini, C.; Fanti, R.; Bromhead, E.N. Cultural Heritage and Landslides: Research for Risk Prevention and
Conservation. In Landslides—Disaster Risk Reduction; Sassa, K., Canuti, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009;
pp. 401–433.
18. Iriarte, E.; Sanchez, M.A.; Foyo, A.; Tomillo, C. Geological risk assessment for cultural heritage conservation in karstic caves. J.
Cult. Herit. 2010, 11, 250–258. [CrossRef]
19. Tarragüel, A.A.; Krol, B.; van Westen, C.J. Analysing the possible impact of landslides and avalanches on cultural heritage in
Upper Svaneti, Georgia. J. Cult. Herit. 2012, 13, 453–461. [CrossRef]
20. Carroll, P.; Aarrevaara, E. Review of Potential Risk Factors of Cultural Heritage Sites and Initial Modelling for Adaptation to
Climate Change. Geosciences 2018, 8, 322. [CrossRef]
21. Lollino, G.; Audisio, C. UNESCO World Heritage sites in Italy affected by geological problems, specifically landslide and flood
hazard. Landslides 2006, 3, 311–321. [CrossRef]
22. Soeters, R.; van Westen, C.J. Slope Instability Recognition Analysis and Zonation. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation, Special
Report No. 247, Transportation Research Board National Research Council; Turner, K.T., Schuster, R.L., Eds.; National Academy Press:
Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 129–177
23. Lombardo, L.; Cama, M.; Conoscenti, C.; Märker, M.; Rotigliano, E. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted
decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: Application to the 2009 storm event in
Messina (Sicily, southern Italy). Nat. Hazards 2015, 79, 1621–1648. [CrossRef]
24. Nicu, I.C. Frequency ratio and GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility applied to cultural heritage assessment. J. Cult.
Herit. 2017, 28, 172–176. [CrossRef]
25. Blenkinsop, T.G. Visualizing structural geology: From Excel to Google Earth. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 45, 52–56. [CrossRef]
26. Tavani, S.; Corradetti, A.; Vinci, F.; Parente, M.; Mazzoli, S.; Morsalnejad, D.; Iannace, A. Virtual geological mapping in the
Lurestan region of the Zagros (NW Iran) with Google Earth. Geol. Field Trips Maps 2020, 12, 2–11. [CrossRef]
27. Kerr, J.S. The Conservation Plan; ICOMOS Australia: Sydney, Austrilia, 2013.
28. Cecchi, R.; Gasparoli, P. Prevenzione e manutenzione per i beni culturali edificati. In Il Caso Studio Delle Aree Archeologiche di Roma
e Ostia Antica; Alinea Editrice: Firenze, Italy, 2010.
29. Orba¸sli, A. Archaeological Site Management and Local Development. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2013, 15, 237–253. [CrossRef]
30. Benali Aoudia, L.; Chennaoui, Y. The Archaeological Site of Tipasa, Algeria: What Kind of Management Plan? Conserv. Manag.
Archaeol. Sites 2017, 19, 173–196. [CrossRef]
31. Baird-Naysmith, L. Archaeological Heritage Management at the Memphis and its Necropolis World Heritage Site. Conserv.
Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2018, 20, 35–51. [CrossRef]
32. Ramos, L.F.; Masciotta, M.G.; Morais, M.J.; Azenha, M.; Ferreira, T.; Pereira, E.B.; Lourenço, P.B. HeritageCARE: Preventive
conservation of built cultural heritage in the South-West Europe. In Innovative Built Heritage Models; van Balen, K., Vandesande,
A., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2018; pp. 135–149.
33. Monumentenwacht. Available online: https://www.monumenten.nl/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
34. Monumentenwacht Vlaanderen. Available online: https://www.monumentenwacht.be/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
35. Monumentendienst. Available online: https://www.monumentendienst.de (accessed on 18 November 2021).
36. Maintain our Heritage. Available online: https://www.maintainourheritage.co.uk/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
37. Doumas, C.G. Managing the Archaeological Heritage: The Case of Akrotiri, Thera (Santorini). Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites
2013, 13, 109–120. [CrossRef]
38. Ababneh, A. Heritage Management and Interpretation: Challenges to Heritage Site-Based Values, Reflections from the Heritage
Site of Umm Qais, Jordan. Archaeologies 2016, 12, 38–72. [CrossRef]
39. Osanna, M.; Rinaldi, E. Planned conservation in Pompeii: Complexity and methodological choices. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain.
Dev. 2018, 8, 111–129. [CrossRef]
40. Demas, M. Planning for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites: A Values-Based Approach. In Management
Planning for Archaeological Sites. An International Workshop Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount
University 19–22 May 2000 Corinth Greece; Teutonico, J.M., Palumbo, G., Eds.; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA,
USA, 2000; pp. 27–50.
41. Heras, V.C.; Wijffels, A.; Cardoso, F.; Vandesande, A.; Santana, M.; Van Orshoven, J.; Steenberghen, T.; Van Balen, K. A value-based
monitoring system to support heritage conservation planning. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 3, 130–147. [CrossRef]
42. CoE—Council of Europe. Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Counc. Eur. Treaty Ser. 2005, 199.
Available online: https://rm.coe.int/090000168071aabc (accessed on 26 November 2020).
43. Al-Ruzouq, R.; Abu Dabous, S. Archaeological Site Information Modelling and Management Based on Close-Range Photogram metry and GIS. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2017, 19, 156–172. [CrossRef]
44. Marra, A.; Sabino, A.; Bartolomucci, C.; Trizio, I.; Mannella, A.; Fabbrocino, G. On a Rational and Interdisciplinary Framework
for the Safety and Conservation of Historical Centres in Abruzzo Region. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 608–626. [CrossRef]
45. Marra, A.; Trizio, I.; Fabbbrocino, G. Digital Tools for the Knowledge and Safeguard of Historical Heritage. In Civil Structural
Health Monitoring. CSHM 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G., Caterino, N., Ceroni, F., Notarangelo,
M.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 645–662.
46. INASA. The Archaeological Site of Pietrabbondante. Available online: https://www.inasaroma.org/pietrabbondante/ (accessed
on 26 November 2021).
47. Bartolomucci, C. Lo stato di conservazione dei beni tra dissesti e degrado. In Sisma Abruzzo 2009. In Archeologia e Terremoto;
Cialone, G., Copersino, M.R., Eds.; ONE Group Edizioni: L’Aquila, Italy, 2013; pp. 132–143.
48. Palumbo, G.; Al-Tikriti, W.Y.; Mahdy, H.; Al Nuaimi, A.; Al Kaabi, A.; Altawallbeh, D.E.; Ali Muhammad, S.; Marcus, B. Protecting
the Invisible: Site-Management Planning at Small Archaeological Sites in al-Ain, Abu Dhabi. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2014,
16, 145–162. [CrossRef]
49. Masciotta, M.G.; Morais, M.J.; Ramos, L.F.; Oliveira, D.V.; Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; González-Aguilera, D. A Digital-based Integrated
Methodology for the Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage: The Experience of HeritageCare Project. Int. J. Archit. Herit.
2021, 15, 844–863. [CrossRef]
50. Russo, M. La fotomodellazione in ambito archeologico: Potenzialità, limiti e prospettive. In Storia-Restauro. Ricerche a Roma e nel
Lazio; Asciutti, M., Ed.; GB Editori: Roma, Italy, 2020; pp. 133–144.
51. Alsadik, B. Crowdsource Drone Imagery—A Powerful Source for the 3D Documentation of Cultural Heritage at Risk. Int. J.
Archit. Herit. 2021, in press.
52. Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Open-access web mapping as a virtual survey tool for cultural heritage: An application to the Armenian
religious architecture documented by Paolo Cuneo. DisegnareCON 2020, 13, 7.1–7.12.
53. Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Crowd-based Tools for Indirect Condition Assessment and Conservation of Cultural Heritage. In
Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer
Science; Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Cantoni, L., Champion, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 38–50.
54. Oomen, J.; Aroyo, L. Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th
International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 29 June–2 July 2011; ACM: New York, NY,
USA, 2011; pp. 138–149.
55. Constantinidis, D. Crowdsourcing Culture: Challenges to Change. In Cultural Heritage in a Changing World; Borowiecki, K., Forbes,
N., Fresa, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 215–234.
56. Bonacchi, C.; Bevan, A.; Keinan-Schoonbaert, A.; Pett, D.; Wexler, J. Participation in heritage crowdsourcing. Mus. Manag.
Curatorship 2019, 34, 166–182. [CrossRef]
57. Frassine, M.; Naponello, G. RAPTOR: Archeologia e tutela. Verso la pubblica amministrazione digitale. Archeol. E Calc. 2012, 23,
81–99.
58. Messaoudi, T.; Véron, P.; Halin, G.; De Luca, L. An ontological model for the reality-based 3D annotation of heritage building
conservation state. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 29, 100–112. [CrossRef]
59. Croce, V.; Caroti, G.; De Luca, L.; Piemonte, A.; Véron, P. Semantic Annotation on Heritage models: 2D/3D approaches and
future research challenges. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2020, XLIII-B2-2020, 829–836. [CrossRef]
60. Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; Masciotta, M.G.; García-Alvarez, J.; Ramos, L.F.; Oliveira, D.V.; Martín-Jiménez, J.A.; González-Aguilera,
D.; Monteiro, P. Web-GIS approach to preventive conservation of heritage buildings. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103304. [CrossRef]
61. Giuliani, C.F. Provvedimenti antisismici nell’antichità. J. Anc. Topogr. 2011, XXI, 25–52.
62. Savini, F.; Rainieri, C.; Fabbrocino, F.; Trizio, I. Applications of Stratigraphic Analysis to Enhance the Inspection and Structural
Characterization of Historic Bridges. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 7. [CrossRef]
63. Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G. On the SeVAMH survey protocol for safety and safeguard of artistic assets. Overview and validation at
the Monumental complex of Santa Chiara in Naples. Restauro Archeol. 2021, 28, 4–17.
64. Brumana, R.; Oreni, D.; Van Hecke, L.; Barazzetti, L.; Previtali, M.; Roncoroni, F.; Valente, R. Combined geometric and thermal
analysis form UAV platforms for archaeological heritage documentation. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci.
2013, II-5/W1, 49–54. [CrossRef]
65. Bolognesi, M.; Furini, A.; Russo, V.; Pellegrinelli, A.; Russo, P. Testing the Low-Cost RPAS Potential in 3D Cultural Heritage
Reconstruction. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, XL-5/W4, 229–235. [CrossRef]
66. Alsadik, B.; Khalid Jasim, L. Active use of panoramic mobile mapping systems for as built surveying and heritage documentation.
Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2019, 13, 244–256. [CrossRef]
67. Grün, A.; Remondino, F.; Zhang, L. Photogrammetric reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan, Afghanistan. Photogramm.
Rec. 2004, 19, 177–199. [CrossRef]
68. Stathopoulou, E.K.; Georgopoulos, A.; Panagiotopoulos, G.; Kaliampakos, D. Crowdsourcing lost cultural heritage. ISPRS Ann.
Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, II-5/W3, 295–300. [CrossRef]
69. De Beer, J.; Matthiensen, H.; Christensson, A. Quantification and Visualization of In Situ Degradation at the World Heritage Site
Bryggen in Bergen, Norway. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2012, 14, 215–227. [CrossRef]
70. Mezzino, D.; Chan, L.; Santana Quintero, M.; Esponda, M.; Lee, S.; Min, A.; Pwint, M. Built Heritage Documentation and
Management: An Integrate Conservation Approach in Bagan. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, IV-2/W2,
143–150. [CrossRef]
71. Trizio, I.; Marra, A.; Savini, F.; Fabbrocino, G. Survey Methodologies and 3D Modelling for Conservation of Historical Masonry
Bridges. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, VIII-M-1-2021, 163–170. [CrossRef]
72. Reina Ortiz, M.; Yang, C.; Weigert, A.; Dhanda, A.; Min, A.; Gyi, M.; Su, S.; Fai, S.; Santana Quintero, M. Integrating Heterogeneous
Datasets in HBIM of Decorated Surfaces. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W15, 981–988. [CrossRef]
73. Nieto-Julián, J.E.; Antón, D.; Moyano, J.J. Implementation and Management of Structural Deformations into Historic Building
Information Models. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2020, 14, 1384–1397. [CrossRef]
74. Marra, A. Know4CARE. Uno Strumento per la Documentazione e Conservazione del Patrimonio Culturale; PUBLICA: Alghero, Italy,
2022.
75. Jouan, P.; Hallot, P. Digital Twin: Research Framework to Support Preventive Conservation Policies. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9,
228. [CrossRef]
76. Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research.
Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [CrossRef]
77. Mora, R.; Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; Maté-González, M.Á.; García-Álvarez, J.; Sanchez-Aparicio, M.; Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. An
historical building information modelling approach for the preventive conservation of historical constructions: Application to the
Historical Library of Salamanca. Autom. Constr. 2021, 121, 103449. [CrossRef]
78. Doan, A.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Halevy, A.Y. Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web. Commun. ACM 2011, 54, 86–96.
79. Berardi, E. (Ed.) Normativa F—Fotografia (v. 4.00). Strutturazione dei Dati e Norme di Compilazione, 2016, Available online:
http://www.iccd.beniculturali.it/getFile.php?id=8144 (accessed on 10 June 2022).
80. Fabbrocino, G.; Marra, A.; Savini, F.; Trizio, I. Virtual investigation of masonry arch bridges: Digital procedures for inspection,
diagnostics, and data management. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and
Structures. EUROSTRUCT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas,
J.R., Strauss, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 979–987.
81. Calabrò, F. Local Communities and Management of Cultural Heritage of the Inner Areas. An Application of Break-Even Analysis.
In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra,
S., Borruso, G., Torre, C.M., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Stankova, E., Cuzzocrea, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham,
Switzerland, 2017; pp. 516–531.
82. Barca, F.; Casavola, P.; Lucatelli, S. A strategy for Inner Areas in Italy: Definition, Objectives, Tools and Governance. Mater. UVAL
2014, 31, 1–66.
83. De Giovanni, G. Problematiche di valorizzazione, fruizione e musealizzazione dei beni culturali. Tecnologie innovative per la
città ritrovata. In Il Paesaggio Agrario Italiano Protostorico e Antico. Storia e Didattica; Bonini, G., Brusa, A., Cervi, R., Eds.; Istituto
Alcide Cervi: Gattatico, Italy, 2010; pp. 165–177.
84. Di Pietro, L.; Guglielmetti Mugion, R.; Mattia, G.; Renzi, M.F. Cultural heritage and consumer behaviour: A survey on Italian
cultural visitors. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 5, 61–81. [CrossRef]
85. Blasco López, M.F.; Recuero Virto, N.; Aldas Manzano, J.; Garcis-Madriaga, J. Tourism sustainability in archaeological sites. J.
Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 8, 276–292. [CrossRef]
86. La Regina, A. ‘Domus publica’. Un esempio di edilizia sacra nel Sannio. In Lectio Brevis—Anno Accademico 2015–2016; Bardi
Edizioni: Roma, Italy, 2017; pp. 405–437.
87. La Regina, A. Le armi nel santuario di Pietrabbondante. In Armi Votive in Magna Grecia; Graells i Fabregat, R., Longo, F., Eds.;
Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum: Mainz, Germany, 2018; pp. 241–260.
88. D’Amico, P. Le armi dell’Aerarium di Pietrabbondante: Strutture e fasi di frequentazione. In Armi Votive in Magna Grecia; Graells i
Fabregat, R., Longo, F., Eds.; Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum: Mainz, Germany, 2018; pp. 261–270.
89. D’Amico, P. Pietrabbondante, FastiOnline. 2018. Available online: http://www.fastionline.org/excavation/micro_view.php?fst_
cd=AIAC_2411&curcol=sea_cd-AIAC_10058 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
90. La Regina, A. Pietrabbondante. In Culture Adriatiche Antiche di Abruzzo e di Molise; Cianfarani, V., Franchi dell’Orto, L., La Regina,
A., Eds.; De Luca Editore: Roma, Italy, 1978; pp. 449–489.
91. D’Amico, P. Pietrabbondante: L’aerarium del santuario. ArcheoMolise 2018, 32, 18–27.
92. La Regina, A.; Sanniti, I. Italia, Omnium Terrarum Parens; Pugliese Carratelli, G., Ed.; Libri Scheiwiller: Milano, Italy, 1989;
pp. 301–432, 697–700.
93. La Regina, A. Pietrabbondante Ricerche Archeologiche 2006; INASA: Roma, Italy, 2006.
94. La Regina, A. Pietrabbondante e il Sannio Antico. In Almanacco del Molise 2014; Astorri, I., Di Rocco, G., Eds.; Arte Contemporanea:
Campobasso, Italy, 2014; pp. 161–208.
95. La Regina, A. La domus publica di Pietrabbondante. ArcheoMolise 2010, 4, 32–43.
96. Fabbrocino, S.; Lanzano, G.; Forte, G.; Santucci De Magistris, F.; Fabbrocino, G. SPT blow count vs. shear wave velocity
relationship in the structurally complex formations of the Molise Region (Italy). Eng. Geol. 2015, 187, 84–97. [CrossRef]
97. Selli, R. Il Paleogene nel quadro della geologia dell’Italia centro-meridionale. Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1962, 3, 737–789. (In Italian)
98. Mostardini, F.; Merlini, S. Appennino centro meridionale. Sezioni geologiche e proposta di modello strutturale. In Proceedings of
the Geologia dell’Italia Centrale, Congresso Nazionale 73, Roma, Italy, 30 September–4 October 1986; pp. 1–59.
99. Patacca, E.; Scandone, P.; Bellatalla, M.; Perilli, N.; Santini, U. La zona di giunzione tra l’Arco appenninico settentrionale e l’arco
appenninico meridionale nell’Abruzzo e nel Molise. Studi Geol. Camerti 1992, CROP 11, 417–441.
100. Patacca, E.; Scandone, P. Geology of Southern Apennines. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 2007, 7, 75–119.
101. ISPRA. Carta Geologica d’Italia Alla Scala 1:50.000. Foglio 393-Trivento. 2010. Available online: https://www.isprambiente.gov.
it/Media/carg/393_TRIVENTO/Foglio.html (accessed on 30 November 2021).
102. Patacca, E.; Scandone, P.; De Martino, V. Upper Triassic basinal carbonates between the Molise and Sannio Nappes near Frosolone
(Duronia, Molise): Geological implications. Rend. Online Soc. Geol. Ital. 2012, 23, 83–89.
103. ISPRA. IFFI Project. Italian Landslide Inventory. 2005. Available online: http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/en/projects/soil-and territory/iffi-project/default (accessed on 18 November 2021).
104. De Pari, P.; Romano, S. Report on geological-technical studies, Municipality of Pietrabbondante. In Design of the Pietrabbondante
Archaeological Complex; Comune di Pietrabbondante (IS): Pietrabbondante, Italy, 2007. (In Italian)
105. Romano, S.; Fostinelli, A.; De Pari, P. Report on geological studies. Municipality of Pietrabbondante. In Preliminary Territorial
Regeneration Plan; Comune di Pietrabbondante (IS): Pietrabbondante, Italy, 2009. (In Italian)
106. Volpe, E. Protezione e Conservazione dei Siti Archeologici in Aree Predisposte a Fenomeni di Dissesto Idrogeologico. Ph.D.
Thesis, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy, 2020. Available online: https://iris.unimol.it/handle/11695/97964 (accessed on
30 November 2021).
107. MIBACT. Visitatori e Introiti di Musei, Monumenti e Aree Archeologiche Statali. Tavola 7. Dati per Singolo Istituto Museale. 2021.
Available online: http://www.statistica.beniculturali.it/Visitatori_e_introiti_musei_19.htm (accessed on 30 November 2021)
108. Bertagni, S.; Boarin, P.; Zuppiroli, M. The Dialogue between Structural Interventions and Sustainability Criteria in Rating Systems
for Cultural Heritage: The Experience of GBC Historic Building. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2020, 14, 139–161. [CrossRef]
109. Marra, A.; Trizio, I.; Savini, F.; Ruggieri, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Una procedura per l’Historic Digital Twin (HDT) dei ponti ad arco in
muratura/A procedure for Heritage Digital Twin (HDT) of masonry arch bridges. In 3D Modelling e BIM 2021—Digital Twin;
Empler, T., Caldarone, A., Fusinetti, A., Eds.; DEI srl Tipografia del Genio Civile: Roma, Italy, 2021; pp. 358–373.
110. Frassine, M.; Naponello, G.; De Francesco, S.; Asta, A. RAPTOR 1.5 Aggiornamenti e sperimentazioni. Archeol. Calc. 2016, 8,
61–71.
111. Marra, A. Il complesso monumentale di Santa Chiara a Napoli: Un modello innovativo per la conoscenza e la valorizzazione. In
Conoscere, Conservare, Valorizzare. Il Patrimonio Religioso Culturale; Niglio, O., Visentin, C., Eds.; Aracne Editrice: Roma, Italy, 2017;
Volume III, pp. 141–146.
112. Savini, F. Comunicare l’archeologia con le immagini: Dal disegno ricostruttivo alla realtà virtuale. In Linguaggi Grafici. Illustrazione;
Cicalò, E., Trizio, I., Eds.; PublicaPress: Alghero, Italy, 2020; pp. 722–755.
113. Trizio, I.; Savini, F.; Giannangeli, A.; Fiore, S.; Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G.; Ruggieri, A. Versatil Tools: Digital Survey and Virtual
Reality for Documentation, Analysis and Fruition of Cultural Heritage in Seismic Areas. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat.
Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W17, 377–384. [CrossRef]
114. Litvak, E.; Kuflik, T. Enhancing cultural heritage outdoor experience with augmented-reality smart glasses. Pers. Ubiquitous
Comput. 2020, 24, 873–886. [CrossRef]
115. CAPWARE. I Sanniti a Pietrabbondante. 2005. Available online: http://www.capware.it/project/sanniti-a-pietrabbondante/
(accessed on 30 November 2021).
116. Garcia, A.; Linaza, M.T.; Gutierrez, A.; Garcia, E. Gamified mobile experiences: Smart technologies for tourism destinations. Tour.
Rev. 2019, 74, 30–49. [CrossRef]
117. Bugeja, M.; Grech, E.M. Using Technology and Gamification as a Means of Enhancing Users’ Experience at Cultural Heritage
Sites. In Rediscovering Heritage Through Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence; Seychell, D., Dingli, A., Eds.; Springer:
Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 859, pp. 69–89