Natural hazards and earthquake science: Gender matters

Gender equality is far from being reached in the areas of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Women in Earth Sciences still remain underrepresented although positive trends are recognized in the last decades. Dealing with gender inequalities in academia, however, is only part of the problem. As well as Earth Sciences need more women in leadership positions and decision-making committees, and more girls educated in the field, alike there are well-founded reasons for scientists to put attention to gender in a broader sense. According to United Nations, inadequate attention has been given how gender inequality drives disaster risks and impacts. The present contribution aims to broaden the gender perspective from improving underrepresentation in the workplace and breaking down barriers in research careers, to including gender in research content in an extensive sense. A paradigm shift is proposed from women in science to women in society, coping with gender-responsive disaster risk reduction and multiple gender dimensions in Earth Sciences. Counterbalancing present inequalities in the workplace, as well as applying a gender lens in all hazard-related activities is needed to cope with complex social systems in earthquake-prone areas. An intersectional approach and transdisciplinary research are needed.

Agnini, C., Pamato, M.G., Salviulo, G, Barchi, K.A., and Nestola, F. (2020). Women in geosciences within the Italian University system in the last 20 years. Adv. Geosci. 53, 155–167. doi: 10.5194/adgeo-53-155-2020
Alexander, D., Gaillard, J.C., Kelman, I, Marincioni, F, Penning Rowsell, E, van Niekerk, D. et al. (2021). Academic publishing in disaster risk reduction: past, present, and future. Disasters 45(1): 5-18. doi:10.1111/disa.12432
Álvarez-Díaz, J. A. (2018). Gender, disasters and mortality: Earthquake in Mexico City, September 19th, 2017. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25, 2831-2836. doi:10.1590/1413-81232020257.30802018
Avvisati, G., Bellucci Sessa, E., Colucci, O., Marfè, B., Marotta, E., Nave, R. et al. (2019). Perception of risk for natural hazards in Campania Region (Southern Italy). Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 40, 101164. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101164
Cadag, J.R. (2022). Decolonizing disasters. Disasters. First published: 14 June 2022. doi:10.1111disa.12550
Carmassi, C., Rossi, A., Pedrinelli, V., et al. (2020). PTSD in the aftermath of a natural disaster: what we learned from the Pisa-L’Aquila Collaboration Project. J. psychopathol. 26:99-106. doi:10.36148/2284-0249-377
CGD (2021a). Gender and Disaster. Bibliography & Reference Guide – Volume 1, second Edition. UCL: London. Centre for Gender and Disaster. Available at: https://bit.ly/3R5zKm3 (Accessed August 18, 2022).
CGD (2021b). Gender and Disaster. Bibliography & Reference Guide – Volume 2. UCL: London. Centre for Gender and Disaster. Available at: https://bit.ly/3wIcFxV(Accessed August 18, 2022).
Chen, K.H., Bossu, R., and Liang, W-T. (2020). Editorial: The Power of Citizen Seismology: Science and Social Impacts. Front. Earth Sci. 8:610813. doi:10.3389/feart.2020.610813
Cigala, V., Roder, G., & Kreibich, H. (2022). Invited perspectives: “Natural hazard management, professional development and gender equity: let’s get down to business”, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 85–96. doi:10.5194/nhess-22-85-2022
Diaz, J., Schimmel, M., Ruiz, M. and Carbonell, R. (2020). Seismometers Within Cities: A Tool to Connect Earth Sciences and Society. Front. Earth Sci. 8:9. doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00009
Di Baldassarre, G., Mondino, E., Rusca, M., Del Giudice, E., Mard, J., Ridolfi, E. et al. (2021). Multiple hazards and risk perceptions over time: the availability heuristic in Italy and Sweden under COVID-19. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. 21 (11), 3439–3447. doi:10.5194/nhess-21-3439-2021
Erman, A., De Vries Robbé, S.A., Thies, F.S., Kabir, K., and Maruo, M. (2021). Gender Dimensions of Disaster Risk and Resilience. GFDRR – World Wide Bank. Available at: https://bit.ly/3pWsRHM (Accessed August 18, 2022).
EC (2020). Gendered innovations 2 - How inclusive analysis contributes to research and innovation: policy review. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. doi:10.2777/316197
EC (2021). Horizon Europe guidance on gender equality plans. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2021). doi:10.2777/876509
Gaillard, J., Sanz, K., Balgos, B.C., Dalisay, S.N.M., Gorman-Murray, A., Smith, F. and Toelupe, V. (2017). Beyond men and women: a critical perspective on gender and disaster. Disasters, 41: 429-447. doi:10.1111/disa.12209
GEO (2021). GEO Report on Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion. Group on Earth Observations. Available at: https://bit.ly/3RlTSQB (Accessed August 18, 2022).
Griffin, J.D., Allen, T.I., and Gerstenberger, M.C. (2020). Seismic Hazard Assessment in Australia: Can Structured Expert Elicitation Achieve Consensus in the “Land of the Fair Go”? Seismol. Res. Lett. 91 (2A): 859–873. doi:10.1785/0220190186
Hall, S., Sloan-Aagard, C., Harris, R., Emmett, C., Prasetyadi, C., Pettersson, J. et al. (2022). Perceptions of tsunami susceptibility and self-efficacy among adolescents in Indonesia: The influence of gender, religion, location, age, hazard information source, and past experience. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 79:103151. doi:j.ijdrr.2022.103151
Handley, H.K., Hillman, J., Finch, M. et al. (2020). In Australasia, gender is still on the agenda in geosciences. Adv. Geosci., 53, 205–226. doi.org:10.5194/adgeo-53-205-2020
Henriques, M.H. and Garcia, L.F. (2022). Women Underrepresentation in Editorial Boards of Geology Journals and the Utopia of Gender Equality. Front. Earth Sci. 10:803900. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.803900
Hough, S. E., and Martin, S. S. (2021). Which earthquake accounts matter? Seismol. Res. Lett. 92 (2A): 1069–1084. doi:10.1785/0220200366
Hough, S.E. (2021). Contributed Reports of Widely Felt Earthquakes in California, United States: If They Felt it, Did They Report it? Front. Earth Sci. 9:770445. doi:10.3389/feart.2021.770445
Ibrahim, K., Khodursky, S. and Yasseri, T. (2021). Gender Imbalance and Spatiotemporal Patterns of Contributions to Citizen Science Projects: The Case of Zooniverse. Front. Phys. 9:650720. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.650720
ISC-UNDRR-IRDR (2021). A Framework for Global Science in support of Risk Informed Sustainable Development and Planetary Health. Paris, France, International Science Council; Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction; Beijing, China, Integrated Research on Disaster Risk. doi:10.24948/2021.07
IPSOS (2021). LGBT+Pride 2021 Global Survey. Available at: shorturl.at/sKZ49 (Accessed October 26, 2022)
Jesus-Rydin, C., Richardson, K., Toth, E., Karsten, J., and Oguchi, C. (eds.) (2020). Diversity and equality in the geosciences. Adv. Geosci. 53. https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/53/
Korsvik, T. R. and Rustad, L.M. (2019). What is the gender dimension in research? Case studies in the interdisciplinary research. Kilden genderresearch.no. Available at: https://bit.ly/3CO5qIq (Accessed August 18, 2022).
Kurnio, H, Fekete, A, Naz, F, Norf, C, and Jüpner, R (2021). Resilience learning and indigenous knowledge of earthquake risk in Indonesia. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 62: 102423. doi.org:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102423
Lakomy´, M., Hlavova´., R, Machackova, H., Bohlin, G., Lindholm, M., Bertero, M.G., et al. (2020). The motivation for citizens' involvement in life sciences research is predicted by age and gender. PLoS ONE 15(8): e0237140. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237140
Lee, K.A., Lee, J.R. and Bell, P. (2020). A review of Citizen Science within the Earth Sciences: potential benefits and obstacles. Proc Geol Assoc. 131(6), 605-617, doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2020.07.010
Llorente-Marrón, M., Fontanil-Gómez, Y., Díaz-Fernández, M. and Solís García, P. (2021) Disasters, Gender, and HIV Infection: The Impact of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18 (13):7198. doi:10.3390/ijerph18137198
Luna, K.C. and Hilhorst, D. (2022). Gendered experience of disaster: Women’s account of evacuation, relief and recovery in Nepal. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 72:102840. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102840
Mallick, J., Salam, R., Amin, R. et al. (2022). Assessing factors affecting drought, earthquake, and flood risk perception: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 112, 1633–1656. doi:10.1007/s11069-022-05242-w
Modena, M.G., Pettorelli, D., Lauria, G., Giubertoni, E., Mauro, E., and Martinotti, V. (2017). Gender Differences in Post-Traumatic Stress. Bioresearch Open Access, 6, 7-14, doi: 10.1089/biores.2017.0004
Moreno, J., and Shaw, D. (2018). Women’s empowerment following disaster: a longitudinal study of social change. Nat. Hazards, 92, 205–224. doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3204-4
Pachankis, J.E., and Bränström, R. (2019). How many sexual minorities are hidden? Projecting the size of the global closet with implications for policy and public health. PLoS ONE 14(6): e0218084. doi.org:10.1371/journal.pone.0218084
Paleco, C., García Peter, S., Salas Seoane, N., Kaufmann, J. and Argyri, P. (2021). “Inclusiveness and Diversity in Citizen Science”. In The Science of Citizen Science, edited by K. Vohland et al. Springer Cham doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_14
Petraroli, I., and Baars, R. (2022). To be a woman in Japan: Disaster vulnerabilities and gendered discourses in disaster preparedness in Japan. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 70:102767. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102767
Quitoriano, V. and Wald, D.J. (2020). USGS "Did You Feel It?"- Science and Lessons From 20 Years of Citizen Science-Based Macroseismology. Front. Earth Sci. 8:120. doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00120
Ranganathan, M., Lalk, E., Freese, L. M., Freilich, M. A., Wilcots, J., Duffy, M. L. et al. (2021). Trends in the representation of women among US geoscience faculty from 1999 to 2020: The long road toward gender parity. AGU Advances, 2, e2021AV000436. doi:10.1029/2021AV000436
Rushton, A., Gray, L., Canty, J., and Blanchard, K. (2019). Beyond Binary: (Re)Defining ‘Gender’ for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction Research, Policy, and Practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16, 3984. doi:10.3390/ijerph16203984
Tagliacozzo, S., and Di Tullio, I. (2021). Gender equality plans (GEPs) as a framework to devise gender equality measures for disaster research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60, 102294. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102294
Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R.P., Eyssel, F., Zou J, and Schiebinger, L. (2019). Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature 575,137–146. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6
Thurston, A.M., Stöckl, H. and Ranganathan, M. (2021). Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Glob. Health 6(4):e00437. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004377
UNDRR (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available at: https://bit.ly/2wMbJte (Accessed August 18, 2022).
UNDRR (2021). Sendai Framework Monitor sex, age and disability disaggregated data. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available at: https://www.undrr.org/media/76930/download (Accessed October 27, 2022).
UNWomen (2021). A 6 step guide to understanding the gender and age dimensions of disasters. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. Available at: https://wrd.unwomen.org/practice/listing-toolbox/six-step-guide-gender-and-age-inequality-informed-data-missing-voices (Accessed October 27, 2022).
UNWomen (2022). Intersectionality Resource Guide and Toolkit: An Intersectional Approach to Leave No One Behind. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. Available at: https://bit.ly/3PZy24p (Accessed August 18, 2022).
UNWomen-UNDRR-UNFPA (2022). Midterm review of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030: gender guidance. Available at: https://bit.ly/3Q5wzJM (Accessed August 18, 2022).
Velasco, A.A., Aderhold, K., Alfaro-Diaz, R., Brown, W., Brudzinski, M.R., Fraiser, M. et al. (2021). News and Notes: SSA Task Force on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Toward a Changing, Inclusive Future in Earthquake Science. Seismol. Res. Lett. 92 (5): 3267–3275. doi:10.1785/0220210170
Wroblewski, A. (2021) Quotas and Gender Competence: Independent or Complementary Approaches to Gender Equality?. Front. Sociol. 6:740462. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.740462
Yadav, P., Saville, N., Arjyal, A., Baral, S., Kostkova, P. and Fordham, M. (2021). A feminist vision for transformative change to disaster risk reduction policies and practices. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 54:102026. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102026
Yadav, P., Lassa, J., Marchezini, V. and van Niekerk, D. (2022). Guest editorial: Introduction to calling for change in disaster studies - rethinking disaster studies. Disaster Prev. Manag. 31(3):177-181. doi:10.1108/DPM-06-2022-418
Zaidi R.Z., and Fordham, M. (2021). The missing half of the Sendai framework: Gender and women in the implementation of global disaster risk reduction policy, Progress in Disaster Science 10:100170. doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100170