Comparison of characteristic and Gutenberg–Richter models for time-dependentM ≥ 7.9 earthquake probability in the Nankai-Tokai subduction zone, Japan

Earthquake forecasts are usually underinformed, and can be plagued by uncertainty in terms of the most appropriate model, and parameter values used in that model. In this paper, we explore the application of two different models to the same seismogenic area. The first is a renewal
model based on the characteristic earthquake hypothesis that uses historical/palaeoseismic
recurrence times, and fixed rupture geometries. The hazard rate is modified by the Coulomb static stress change caused by nearby earthquakes that occurred since the latest characteristic earthquake. The second model is a very simple earthquake simulator based on plate-motion, or fault-slip rates and adoption of a Gutenberg–Richter magnitude–frequency distribution. This
information is commonly available even if historical and palaeoseismic recurrence data are lacking. The intention is to develop and assess a simulator that has a very limited parameter set that could be used to calculate earthquake rates in settings that are not as rich with observations of large-earthquake recurrence behaviour as the Nankai trough. We find that the use of convergence rate as a primary constraint allows the simulator to replicate much of the
spatial distribution of observed segmented rupture rates along the Nankai, Tonankai and Tokai subduction zones. Although we note rate differences between the two forecast methods in the Tokai zone, we also see enough similarities between simulations and observations to suggest that very simple earthquake rupture simulations based on empirical data and fundamental earthquake laws could be useful forecast tools in information-poor settings.

Abercrombie, R.E. & Brune, J.N., 1994. Evidence for a constant b-value
above magnitude 0 in the southern San Andreas, San Jacinto and San
Miguel fault zones, and at the Long Valley caldera, California, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 21, 1647–1650.
Ando, M., 1975a. Possibility of a major earthquake in the Tokai district,
Japan, and its pre-estimated seismo-tectonic effects, Tectonophysics, 27,
119–140. Ando, M., 1975b. Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical
earthquakes along the Nankai trough, Japan, Tectonophysics, 27,
119–140.
Aoi, S., Enescu, B., Suzuki, W., Asano, Y., Obara, K., Kunugi, T. & Shiomi,
K., 2010. Stress transfer in the Tokai subduction zone from the
2009 Suruga Bay earthquake in Japan, Nature Geosci., 3, 496–500,
doi:10.1038/NGEO885.
Barka, A.A. & Kandinsky-Cade, K., 1988. Strike-slip fault geometry in
Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity, Tectonics, 7, 663–684.
Console, R. & Catalli, F., 2007. A rate-state model for aftershocks triggered
by dislocation on a rectangular fault: a review and new insights, Ann.
Geophys., 49(6), 1259–1273.
Console R., Murru, M., Falcone, G. & Catalli, F., 2008. Stress interaction effect
on the occurrence probability of characteristic earthquakes in Central
Apennines, J. geophys. Res., 113, B08313, doi:10.1029/2007JB005418.
Console, R., Murru, M. & Falcone, G., 2010. Perturbation of earthquake
probability for interacting faults by static Coulomb stress changes, J.
Seismol., 14, 67–77, doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9149-4.
ERC, 2001. Report of the Earthquake Research Committee, Subcommitte
for long-term evaluation, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion,
Japan (in Japanese).
Furumura, T. & Saito, T., 2009. Integrated ground motion and tsunami
simulation for the 1944 Tonankai earthquake using high-performance
supercomputers, J. Disaster Res., 4, 118–126.
Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C.R., 1954. Magnitude and energy of earthquakes,
Ann. Geofis., 9, 1–15.
Hagiwara, Y., 1974. Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from
a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain, Tectonophysics, 23,
323–318.
Hanks, T.C. & Kanamori, H., 1979. A moment magnitude scale, J. geophys.
Res., 84, 2348–2350.
Harris, R.A., 1992. Peri-collisional extension and the formation of Omantype
ophiolites in the Brooks Range and Banda arc, in Ophiolites and
Their Modern Oceanic Analogues, Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. Vol.
60, pp. 301–325, eds Parsons, L.M., Murton, B.J. & Browning, P., The
Geological Society, London.
Harris, R.A. & Day, S.M., 1993. Dynamics of fault interaction: parallel
strike-slip faults, J. geophys. Res., 98, 4461–4472.
Harris, R.A. & Day, S.M., 1999. Dynamic 3D simulations of earthquakes
on en echelon faults, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2089–2092.
Hori, T., Kato, N., Hirahara, K., Baba, T. & Kaneda, Y., 2004. A numerical
simulation of earthquake cycles along the Nankai Trough in southwest
Japan: lateral variation in frictional property due to the slab geometry
controls the nucleation position, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 228, 215–226,
doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.033.
Ishibashi, K., 1976. Re-examination of a great earthquake expected in the
Tokai district: possibility of the ‘Suruga bay earthquake’, Abstracts, Seismol.
Soc. Japan, 2, 30–34 (in Japanese).
Ishibashi, K., 1980. Comments on the long-term prediction of the Tokai
earthquake, in Proceedings of the Earthquake Prediction Research Symposium,
National Committee for Seismology in Science Council of Japan
and Seismological Society of Japan, pp. 123–125 (in Japanese with
English abstract).
Ishibashi, K., 1981. Specification of a soon-too-occur seismic faulting in
the Tokai district, central Japan, based upon seismotectonics, in Earthquake
Prediction—An International Review, Maurice Ewing Ser. IV,
pp. 297–332, eds Simpson,D.W.&Richards, P.G., American Geophysical
Union, Washington, DC.
Ishibashi, K. & Satake, K., 1998. Problems on forecasting great earthquakes
in the subduction zones around Japan bymeans of paleoseismology, Zisin,
J. Seismol. Soc. Japan, 50, 1–21 (in Japanese).
Ishibashi, K., 1999. Great Tokai and Nankai, Japan, earthquakes as revealed
by historical seismology: 1. Review of the events until the mid-14th century,
Chigaku Zasshi, J. Geogr., 108, 399–423 (in Japanese with English
abstract).
Ishimoto, M. & Iida, K., 1939. Observations sur les seismes enregistres
par le microseimographe construit dernierement, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst.
Univ. Tokyo, 17, 443–478 (in Japanese with French abstract). Ito, T. & Hashimoto, M., 2004. Spatiotemporal distribution of interplate
coupling in southwest Japan from inversion of geodetic data, J. geophys.
Res., 109, B02315, doi:10.1029/2002JB002358.
Jackson, D.D. & Kagan, Y.Y., 1993. Reply to Nishenko and Sykes, J. geophys.
Res., 98, 9917–9920.
Kagan, Y.Y., 2002a. Seismic moment distribution revisited: statistical results,
Geophys. J. Int., 148, 520–541.
Kagan, Y.Y., 2002b. Seismic moment distribution revisited: II. Moment
conservation principle, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 731–754.
Kagan, Y.Y. & Knopoff, L., 1987. Random stress and earthquake statistics:
time dependence, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 88, 723–731.
Kagan, Y.Y. & Jackson, D.D., 1991. Seismic gap hypothesis: ten years after,
J. geophys. Res., 96(B13), doi:10.1029/91JB02210.
Kagan, Y.Y. & Jackson, D.D., 1995. New seismic gap hypothesis: five years
after, J. geophys. Res., 100, 3943–3960.
Lettis, W., Bachhuber, J., Witter, R., Brankman, C., Randolph, C.E., Barka,
A., Page, W.D. & Kaya, A., 2002. Influence of releasing step-overs on
surface fault rupture and fault segmentation: examples from the 17 August
1999 Izmit earthquake on the North Anatolian fault, Turkey, Bull. seism.
Soc. Am., 92, 19–42.
L´opez-Ruiz, R., V´azquez-Prada, M., G´omez, J.B. & Pacheco, A.F., 2004.
A model of characteristic earthquakes and its implications for regional
seismicity, TerraNova, 16, 116–120, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2004.
00538.x.
Marzocchi, W. & Lombardi, A.M., 2008. A double branching
model for earthquake occurrence, J. geophys. Res., 113, B08317,
doi:10.1029/2007JB005472.
Matthews, M.V., Ellsworth, W.L. & Reasenberg, P.A., 2002. A Brownian
Model for recurrent earthquakes, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2233–
2250.
Mazzotti, S., Le Pichon, X. & Henry, P., 2000. Full interseismic locking
of the Nankai and Japan-west Kurile subduction zones: an analysis of
uniform elastic strain accumulation in Japan constrained by permanent
GPS, J. geophys. Res., 105, 13 159–13 177.
McCann, W.R., Nishenko, S.P., Sykes, L.R. & Krause, J., 1979. Seismic
gaps and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries, Pure
appl. Geophys., 117, 1082–1147.
Mitsui, N. & Hirahara, K., 2004. Simple spring-mass model simulation of
earthquake cycle along the Nankai trough in Southwest Japan, Pure appl.
Geophys., 161, 2433–2450, doi:10.1007/s00024-004-2574-6.
Mochizuki, K. & Obana, K., 2003. Seismic activities along the Nankai
trough, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 78, 185–195.
Mogi, K., 1968. Sequential occurrences of recent great earthquakes, J. Phys.
Earth, 16, 30–60.
Mogi, K., 1986. Strain accumulation and rupture processes in the subduction
zone along the Nankai-Suruga trough in western Japan, Am. Geophys.
Monogr., 37, 183–194.
Mogi, K., 2004. Two grave issues concerning the expected Tokai earthquake,
Earth Planets Space, 56(li), lxvi.
Nishenko, S.P., 1991. Circum-Pacific seismic potential 1989–1999, Pure
appl. Geophys., 135, 169–259.
Nishenko, S.P.&Buland, R., 1987.Ageneric recurrence interval distribution
for earthquake forecasting, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 77, 1382–1399.
Nishenko, S.P. & Sykes, L.R., 1993. Comment on ‘Seismic gap hypothesis:
ten years after’ by Y.Y. Kagan and D.D. Jackson, J. geophys. Res., 98,
9909–9916.
Nishimura, T., Munekane, H. & Yarai, H., 2011. The 2011 off the Pacific
coast of Tohoku earthquake and its aftershocks observed by GEONET,
Earth Planets Space, 63, 631–636.
Page,M., 2010. Reply to Schwartz and Open Discussion, Seismol. Res. Lett.,
81, 331.
Parsons, T., 2008. Monte Carlo method for determining earthquake recurrence
parameters from short paleoseismic catalogs: example calculations
for California, J. geophys. Res., 113, doi:10.1029/2007JB004998.
Parsons, T. & Geist, E.L., 2009. Is there basis for preferring characteristic
earthquakes over Gutenberg-Richter distributions on individual
faults in probabilistic earthquake forecasting?, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 99,
2012–2019, doi:10.1785/0120080069. Reid, H.F., 1910. The Mechanics of the Earthquake, The California Earthquake
of April 18, 1906, Report of the State Earthquake Investigation
Commission, Vol. 2, Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 87,
Washington, DC.
Rikitake, T., 1975. Statistics of ultimate strain of the earth’s crust and probability
of earthquake occurrence, Tectonophysics, 26, 1–21.
Rikitake, T., 1976. Recurrence of great earthquakes at subduction zones,
Tectonophysics, 35, 335–362.
Rikitake, T., 1977. Probability of a great earthquake to recurr off the pacific
coast of Central Japan, Tectonophysics, 42, T43–T51.
Rong,Y., Jackson,D.D.&Kagan,Y.Y., 2003. Seismic gaps and earthquakes,
J. geophys. Res., 108(B10), 2471, doi:10.1029/2002JB002334.
Sagiya, T. & Thatcher, W., 1999. Coseismic slip resolution along a plate
boundary megathrust: the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan, J. geophys.
Res., 104, 1111–1129.
Sangawa, A., 1999. Earthquake traces carved in excavations in the past 2,000
years, Chkyu Monthly, 24, 56–63 (in Japanese).
Sangawa, A., 2011. What large earthquakes have Japanese people experienced?,
in Introduction to Earthquake Archeology, Heibonsha, Tokyo
259pp. (in Japanese).
Sato, R., Abe, K., Okada, Y., Shimazaki, K. & Suzuki, H., 1989. Handbook
of Earthquake Fault Parameters in Japan, Kashima, Tokyo, 390pp.
(in Japanese).
Schorlemmer, D., Neri, G.,Weimer, S. & Mostaccio, A., 2003. Stability and
significance tests for b-value anomalies: example from the Tyrrhenian
Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL017335.
Schorlemmer, D., Weimer, S. & Wyss, M., 2004. Earthquake statistics
at Parkfield: 1. Stationarity of b values, J. geophys. Res., 109,
doi:10.1029/2004JB003234.
Schwartz, D.P., 2010. Do large earthquakes on faults follow a Gutenberg-
Richter or characteristic distribution?: a characteristic view, Seismol. Res.
Lett., 81, 331.
Schwartz, D.P. & Coppersmith, K.J., 1984. Fault behavior and characteristic
earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones,
J. geophys. Res., 89, 5681–5698.
Shimazaki, K. & Nakata, T., 1980. Seismic gap hypothesis: ten years later,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 279–282.
Stein, R., Barka, A. & Dieterich, J., 1997. Progressive failure on the North
Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering, Geophys. J.
Int., 128, 594–604.
Stein, S. & Newman, A., 2004. Characteristic and uncharacteristic earthquakes
as possible artifacts: applications to the New Madrid and Wabash
seismic zones, Seimol. Res. Lett., 75, 173–187.
Stein, S., Friedrich, A. & Newman, A., 2005. Dependence of possible characteristic
earthquakes on spatial sampling: illustration for the Wasatch
seismic zone, Utah, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 432–436.
Sykes, L.R. & Menke, W., 2006. Repeat times of large earthquakes: implications
for earthquake mechanics and long-term prediction, Bull. seism.
Soc. Am., 96(5), 1569–1596, doi:10.1785/0120050083.
Toda, S., Lin, J. & Stein, R., 2011. Using the 2011 M = 9.0 Tohoku earthquake
to test the Coulomb stress triggering hypothesis and to calculate
faults brought closer to failure, submitted to Tohoku Earthquake, Earth
Planets Space, 63, 725–730.
Utsu, T., 1977. Possibility of a great earthquake in the Tokai district, central
Japan, J. Phys. Earth, 25, S219–S230.
Wang, K., Wada, I. & Ishikawa, Y., 2004. Stresses in the subducting
slab beneath southwest Japan and relation with plate geometry, tectonic
forces, slab dehydration, and damaging earthquakes, J. geophys. Res.,
109, doi:10.1029/2003JB002888.
Wells, D.L. & Coppersmith, K.J., 1994. New empirical relationships among
magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement,
Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 84, 974–1002.
Wesnousky, S.G., 1994. The Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake
distribution,which is it?, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 84, 1940–1959.
Westerhaus, M., Wyss, M., Yilmaz, R. & Zschau, J., 2002. Correlating
variations of b values and crustal deformation during the 1990’s may
have pinpointed the rupture initiation of the Mw = 7.4 Izmit earthquake
of 1999 August 17, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 139–152. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 1995.
Seismic hazards in Southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to
2024, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 85, 379–439.
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 2003.
Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region: 2002 to 2031.
Open-File Rep, U.S. Geol. Surv., 03–214. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 2008.
The uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF
2). Open-File Rep, U.S. Geol. Surv., 07–1437.
Wyss, M., Sammis, C.G., Nadeau, R.M. &Weimer, S., 2004. Fractal dimension
and b-value on creeping and locked patches of the San Andreas fault
near Parkfield, California, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 94, 410–421.