Options
Maufroy, Emeline
Loading...
2 results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- PublicationOpen AccessAccessing European Strong-Motion Data: An Update on ORFEUS Coordinated Services(2021)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ;; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ;; ;; ;; ; ;Strong ground motion records and free open access to strong‐motion data repositories are fundamental inputs to seismology, engineering seismology, soil dynamics, and earthquake engineering science and practice. This article presents the current status and outlook of the Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology (ORFEUS) coordinated strong‐motion seismology services, namely the rapid raw strong‐motion (RRSM) and the engineering strong‐motion (ESM) databases and associated web interfaces and webservices. We compare and discuss the role and use of these two systems using the Mw 6.5 Norcia (Central Italy) earthquake that occurred on 30 October 2016 as an example of a well‐recorded earthquake that triggered major interest in the seismological and earthquake engineering communities. The RRSM is a fully automated system for rapid dissemination of earthquake shaking information, whereas the ESM provides quality‐checked, manually processed waveforms and reviewed earthquake information. The RRSM uses only data from the European Integrated Waveform Data Archive, whereas the ESM also includes offline data from other sources, such as the ITalian ACcelerometric Archive (ITACA). Advanced software tools are also included in the ESM to allow users to process strong‐motion data and to select ground‐motion waveform sets for seismic structural analyses. The RRSM and ESM are complementary services designed for a variety of possible stakeholders, ranging from scientists to the educated general public. The RRSM and ESM are developed, organized, and reviewed by selected members of the seismological community in Europe, including strong‐motion data providers and expert users. Global access and usage of the data is encouraged. The ESM is presently the reference database for harmonized seismic hazard and risk studies in Europe. ORFEUS strong‐motion data are open, “Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable,” and accompanied by licensing information. The users are encouraged to properly cite the data providers, using the digital object identifiers of the seismic networks.879 101 - PublicationOpen AccessSITE AND SEISMIC STATION CHARACTERIZATION: AN EUROPEAN INITIATIVE(2018-09)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Site characterization is a key input in seismic hazard and risk assessment (e.g. Ground Motion Prediction Equation, microzonation studies, damage scenarios) and seismic design (building codes, critical facilities). Although the number of strong-motion stations in free-field and engineering structures has largely increased over the world in the last twenty years, only a limited number of sites includes detailed site condition indicators: mostly geology and EC8 soil class, more rarely shear-wave velocity (Vs) information (e.g. Vs30 and Vs profiles), without proper documentation and quality assessment in most cases. This lack of information is a critical issue, e.g. for deriving reference rock/soil velocity profiles for region-specific GMPEs, site-specific hazard assessment, vs-kappa adjustments, seismic response of engineering infrastructures, risk modeling at urban or regional scale. Within the framework of the SERA “Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Infrastructure Alliance for Europe” Horizon 2020 Project, a networking activity has been set up to propose a comprehensive European strategy and standards fostering site characterization of seismic stations in Europe. We will present the status of this networking activity that focuses on several issues. The first target is to evaluate the most relevant site characterization scalar, depth and frequencydependant indicators (e.g. Vs30, resonance period, velocity profiles, kappa, amplification factors and functions, etc.) for seismic hazard purposes and, thereafter, to propose best practice for site characterization together with standards for overall quality metrics on site characterization. The second target focuses on disseminating, within the broader seismological and engineering community, site characterization metadata developed within the EU NERA and EPOS-IP projects in order to validate and/or further develop metadata format schemes for wide use. Based on available site characterization information in Europe and considering the research and engineering needs, the third target proposes to set up a road map to prioritize strong motion site characterization in Europe for the next decade. Finally, a task is dedicated to investigate relevance of new site condition and amplification proxies (for example combining resonance frequency, local slope and other parameters, proxy for non-linear effects, wavelength-scaled curvature and topographic position index position as proxies for topographic effects, aggravation factor for basin effects, etc.) and their implementation at the European scale and into site characterization metadata.76 19