Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication
    Open Access
    On the seismicity recorded in the geothermal area of Mt. Amiata. (Oral Presentation - ESC2016-461)
    (2016-09-05) ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    Braun, T.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia
    ;
    Caciagli, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia
    ;
    Dahm, T.; GFZ, Potsdam, Germany
    ;
    Famiani, D.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia
    ;
    Gattuso, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia
    ;
    Krueger, F.; Inst. of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Potsdam University, Potsdam, Germany
    ;
    Ohrnberger, M.; Inst. of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Potsdam University, Potsdam, Germany
    ;
    ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ESC; European Seismological Commission
    ;
    Mt. Amiata in Tuscany (Italy) is an extinct volcano whose last eruptive activity was dated about 200 ky ago. Being still characterized by a high geothermal gradient the area lends itself for geothermal exploitation. Beneath the Tuscan Geothermal Areas seismicity is exclusively observed in the upper crust and is confined in depth by the so called K-horizon (400°C isotherme). The structure above contains permeable layers of highly fractured, volcanic rocks saturated with hot water and steam. Geothermal exploitation from these layers started in the 1960’s. Shallow earthquakes have occurred close to the geothermal wells, and the question is raised whether these event are of natural origin or related to the exploitation of heat. To monitor the seismic activity inside the geothermal field, an 8 station seismic network and a 7 element small aperture seismic array were installed in 2015 in the vicinity of the geothermal power plants during a joint field experiment by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, the University of Potsdam and the GFZ-German Research Center of Geoscience. Already during the first 24 hours of seismic recording the array and the neighboring network stations recorded a M0.5 seismic event in the vicinity of the geothermal field of Bagnore. Since then micro-earthquake activity was recorded regularly. One of the main challenges of the seismic array/network installation, deployed in direct proximity to the geothermal energy production, is to identify seismic events caused by human operations. As hypocenters are located close to the geothermal power plants, at a similar depth as the production level, it is very difficult - if not impossible - to discriminate between natural earthquakes and anthropogenic events. The main goal of the seismic array/network deployed in the framework of our project is to shed some additional light on this question. The monitoring capabilities of the recording system permit a lowering of the detection threshold for local seismic events, performing high-resolution hypocentral determination, especially in the vicinity of the industrial operations, and calculating focal mechanisms. Array techniques and relative location methods will be used for a precise hypocentral determination. Polarization and spectral analysis, will be applied to discriminate seismic recordings from Mt. Amiata that sometimes resemble rather volcano-seismic waveforms with long-period characteristics, than typical tectonic events.
      140  101
  • Publication
    Restricted
    Discrimination between induced, triggered and natural earthquakes close to hydrocarbon reservoirs: A probabilistic approach based on the modeling of depletion-induced stress changes and seismological source parameters.
    (2015-04-13) ; ; ; ; ;
    Dahm, T.; GFZ-Potsdam
    ;
    Cesca, S.; GFZ-Potsdam
    ;
    Hainzl, S.; GFZ-Potsdam
    ;
    Braun, T.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia
    ;
    Krueger, F.; Uni-Potsdam
    ;
    ; ; ; ;
    Earthquakes occurring close to hydrocarbon fields under production are often under critical view of being induced or triggered. However, clear and testable rules to discriminate the different events have rarely been developed and tested. The unresolved scientific problem may lead to lengthy public disputes with unpredictable impact on the local acceptance of the exploitation and field operations. We propose a quantitative approach to discriminate induced, triggered and natural earthquakes, which is based on testable input parameters. Maxima of occurrence probabilities are compared for the cases under question, and a single probability of being triggered or induced is reported. The uncertainties of earthquake location and other input parameters are considered in terms of the integration over probability density functions (pdf). The probability that events have been human-triggered/induced is derived from the modeling of Coulomb stress changes and a rate and state dependent seismicity model. In our case a 3D boundary element method has been adapted for the nuclei of strain approach to estimate the stress changes outside the reservoir, which are related to pore pressure changes in the field formation. The predicted rate of natural earthquakes is either derived from the background seismicity or, in case of rare events, from an estimate of the tectonic stress rate. Instrumentally derived, seismological information on the event location, source mechanism and the size of the rupture plane is of advantage for the method. If the rupture plane has been estimated, the discrimination between induced or only triggered events is theoretically possible if probability functions are convolved with a rupture fault filter. We apply the approach to three recent main-shock events: (1) the Mw 4.3 Ekofisk 2001, North Sea earthquake close to the Ekofisk oil field, the 2004 Mw 4.4 Rotenburg, Northern Germany earthquake in the vicinity of the Söhlingen gas field, and the Mw 6.1 Emilia 2012, Northern Italy earthquake in the vicinity of a hydrocarbon reservoir. The three test cases cover the complete range of possible causes: clearly “human-induced”, “not even human-triggered” and a third case in-between both extremes.
      317  32