Options
Awaji, Toshiyuki
Loading...
6 results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- PublicationRestrictedInterannual-decadal variability of wintertime mixed layer depths in the North Pacific detected by an ensemble of ocean syntheses(2017-08)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;The interannual-decadal variability of the wintertime mixed layer depths (MLDs) over the North Pacific is investigated from an empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of an ensemble of global ocean reanalyses. The first leading EOF mode represents the interannual MLD anomalies centered in the eastern part of the central mode water formation region in phase opposition with those in the eastern subtropics and the central Alaskan Gyre. This first EOF mode is highly correlated with the Pacific decadal oscillation index on both the interannual and decadal time scales. The second leading EOF mode represents the MLD variability in the subtropical mode water (STMW) formation region and has a good correlation with the wintertime West Pacific (WP) index with time lag of 3 years, suggesting the importance of the oceanic dynamical response to the change in the surface wind field associated with the meridional shifts of the Aleutian Low. The above MLD variabilities are in basic agreement with previous observational and modeling findings. Moreover the reanalysis ensemble provides uncertainty estimates. The interannual MLD anomalies in the first and second EOF modes are consistently represented by the individual reanalyses and the amplitudes of the variabilities generally exceed the ensemble spread of the reanalyses. Besides, the resulting MLD variability indices, spanning the 1948–2012 period, should be helpful for characterizing the North Pacific climate variability. In particular, a 6-year oscillation including the WP teleconnection pattern in the atmosphere and the oceanic MLD variability in the STMW formation region is first detected.120 1 - PublicationOpen AccessIntercomparison and validation of the mixed layer depth fields of global ocean syntheses(2017-08)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Intercomparison and evaluation of the global ocean surface mixed layer depth (MLD) fields estimated from a suite of major ocean syntheses are conducted. Compared with the reference MLDs calculated from individual profiles, MLDs calculated from monthly mean and gridded profiles show negative biases of 10–20 m in early spring related to the re-stratification process of relatively deep mixed layers. Vertical resolution of profiles also influences the MLD estimation. MLDs are underestimated by approximately 5–7 (14–16) m with the vertical resolution of 25 (50) m when the criterion of potential density exceeding the 10-m value by 0.03 kg m−3 is used for the MLD estimation. Using the larger criterion (0.125 kg m−3) generally reduces the underestimations. In addition, positive biases greater than 100 m are found in wintertime subpolar regions when MLD criteria based on temperature are used. Biases of the reanalyses are due to both model errors and errors related to differences between the assimilation methods. The result shows that these errors are partially cancelled out through the ensemble averaging. Moreover, the bias in the ensemble mean field of the reanalyses is smaller than in the observation-only analyses. This is largely attributed to comparably higher resolutions of the reanalyses. The robust reproduction of both the seasonal cycle and interannual variability by the ensemble mean of the reanalyses indicates a great potential of the ensemble mean MLD field for investigating and monitoring upper ocean processes.111 130 - PublicationOpen AccessThe Ocean Reanalyses Intercom parison Project (ORA - IP)(2015)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Balmaseda, M. A.; European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, United Kingdom ;Hernandez, F.; nstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Toulouse, France Mercator Océan, Ramonville Saint - Agne, France ;Storto, A.; Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti Climat, Bologna, Italy ; Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Sez Bologna, Bologna, Italy ;Palmer, M. D.; Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Alves, O.; Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Melbourne, Australia ;Shi, L.; Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Melbourne, Australia ;Smith, G. C.; Environment Canada, Québec, Canada ;Toyoda, T.; Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency (MRI/JMA), Tsukuba, Japan ;Valdivieso, M.; University of Reading (U - Reading), Reading, United Kingdom ;Barnier, B.; Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CN RS), Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement (LGGE), Grenoble, France ;Behringer, D.; C l imate Prediction Ce nter, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland, USA ;Boyer, T.; NOAA/NODC, College Park , Maryland ;Chang, Y-S.; Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (GFDL/NOAA), Princeton, New Jer sey Department of Earth Science, Kongju National University, Kongju , South Korea ;Chepurin, G. A.; epartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA ;Ferry, N.; Mercator Océan, Ramonville Saint - Agne, France ;Forget, G.; Program in Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ;Fujii, Y.; Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency (MRI/JMA), Tsukuba, Japan ;Good, S.; Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Guinehut, S.; Collecte Localisation Satellites (CLS), Ramonville Sa i nt - Agne, France ;Haines, K.; University of Reading (U - Reading), Reading, United Kingdom ;Ishikawa, Y.; Center for Earth Information Science and Technology, Japan Agency of Marine - Earth Science and Technology (CEIST/JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan ;Keeley, S.; European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, United Kingdom ;Köhl, A.; Universit ä t Hamburg (U - Hamburg), Hamburg, Germany ;Lee, T.; Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) , California Institute of Technolog y, Pasadena, California ;Martin, M.; Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Masina, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia ;Masuda, S.; Research and Development Center for Global Change (RCGC), JAMSTEC, Yokosuka, Japan ;Meyssignac, B.; Laboratoire d’Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiale’ (LEGOS), Centre National d'Etudes Spatia les (CNES) in Toulouse, France. ;Mogensen, K.; European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, United Kingdom ;Parent, L.; Mercator Océan, Ramonville Saint - Agne, France ;Peterson, K. A.; Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Tang, Y. M.; European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, United Kingdom Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Yin, Y.; Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Melbourne, Australia ;Vernieres, G.; Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (GSFC/NASA), Greenbelt, Maryland ;Wang, X.; Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California ;Waters, J.; Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Wedd, R.; Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Melbourne, Australia ;Wang, O.; Universit ä t Hamburg (U - Hamburg), Hamburg, Germany ;Xue, Y.; C l imate Prediction Ce nter, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland, USA ;Chevallier, M.; CNRM - GAME, Météo - France, CNRS UMR3589, Toulouse, France ;Lemieux, J-F.; Environment Canada, Québec, Canada ;Dupont, F.; Environment Canada, Québec, Canada ;Kuragano, T.; Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency (MRI/JMA), Tsukuba, Japan ;Kamachi, M.; Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency (MRI/JMA), Tsukuba, Japan ;Awaji, T.; Center for Earth Information Science and Technology, Japan Agency of Marine - Earth Science and Technology (CEIST/JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan ;Caltabiano, A.; I nternational CLIVAR Global Project Office, First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, China. ;Wilmer - Becker, K.; GODAE OceanView Pro ject Office, Met Office , Exeter, United Kingdom ;Gaillard, F.; Laboratoire de Physique des Océans (LPO/IFREMER), France; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Uncertainty in ocean analysis methods and deficiencies in the observing system are major obstacles for the reliable reconstruction of the past ocean climate. The variety of existing ocean reanalyses is exploited in a multi-reanalysis ensemble to improve the ocean state estimation and to gauge uncertainty levels. The ensemble-based analysis of signal-to-noise ratio allows the identification of ocean characteristics for which the estimation is robust (such as tropical mixed-layer-depth,upper ocean heat content), and where large uncertainty exists (deep ocean, Southern Ocean, sea-ice thickness, salinity), providing guidance for future enhancement of the observing and data assimilation systems.431 398 - PublicationRestrictedConsistency and fidelity of Indonesian-throughflow total volume transport estimated by 14 ocean data assimilation products(2010-01-06)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Lee, T. ;Awaji, T. ;Balmaseda, M. ;Ferry, N. ;Fujii, Y ;Fukumori, I. ;Giese, B. ;Heimbach, P. ;Kohl, A. ;Masina, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia ;Remy, E. ;Rosati, A. ;Schodlok, M. ;Stammer, D. ;Weaver, A. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ;Monthly averaged total volume transport of the Indonesian throughflow (ITF) estimated by 14 global ocean data assimilation (ODA) products that are decade to multi-decade long are compared among themselves and with observations from the INSTANT Program (2004-2006). The ensemble averaged, time-mean value of ODA estimates is 13.6 Sv (1 Sv = 106 m3/s) for the common 1993-2001 period and 13.9 Sv for the 2004-2006 INSTANT Program period. These values are close to the 15-Sv estimate derived from INSTANT observations. All but one ODA time-mean estimate fall within the range of uncertainty of the INSTANT estimate. In terms of temporal variability, the average scatter among different ODA estimates is 1.7 Sv, which is substantially smaller than the magnitude of the temporal variability simulated by the ODA systems. Therefore, the overall “signal-to-noise” ratio for the ensemble estimates is larger than one. The best consistency among the products occurs on seasonal-to-interannual time scales, with generally stronger (weaker) ITF during boreal summer (winter) and during La Nina (El Nino) events. The averaged scatter among different products for seasonal-to-interannual time scales is approximately 1 Sv. Despite the good consistency, systematic difference is found between most ODA products and the INSTANT observations. All but the highest-resolution (18-km) ODA product show a dominant annual cycle while the INSTANT estimate and the 18-km product exhibit a strong semi-annual signal. The coarse resolution is an important factor that limits the level of agreement between ODA and INSTANT estimates. Decadal signals with periods of 10-15 years are seen. The most conspicuous and consistent decadal change is a relatively sharp increase in ITF transport during 1993-2000 associated with the strengthening tropical Pacific trade wind. Most products do not show a weakening ITF after the mid-1970s’ associated with the weakened Pacific trade wind. The scatter of ODA estimates is smaller after than before 1980, reflecting the impact of the enhanced observations after the 1980s. To assess the representativeness of using the average over a three-year period (e.g., the span of the INSTANT Program) to describe longer-term mean, we investigate the temporal variations of the three-year low-pass ODA estimates. The median range of variation is about 3.2 Sv, which is largely due to the increase of ITF transport from 1993 to 2000. However, the three-year average during the 2004-2006 INSTANT Program period is within 0.5 Sv of the long-term mean for the past few decades.286 330 - PublicationOpen AccessOcean stat estimation for climate research(2009-09-25)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Lee, T.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109 ;Stammer, D.; Institut für Meereskunde, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany, ;Awaji, T.; Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan ;Balmaseda, M.; European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, UK ;Behringer, D.; NOAA/National Center for Environmental Prediction/NOAA, 5200 Auth Rd, Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304, USA ;Carton, J.; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, 3413 Computer & Spaces Sci. Bldg., Univ. MD., College Park, MD 20742 ;Ferry, N.; Mercator-Océan, 8-10 rue Hermès, 31520 Ramonville Saint-Agne, France ;Fischer, A.; Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - 1 rue Miollis - 75732 Paris cedex 15 - France ;Fukumori, I.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109 ;Giese, B.; Dept of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA ;Haines, K.; Reading University, Marine Informatics and Reading e-Science Centre, ESSC, Harry Pitt Bld, 3 Earley Gate, Reading University, Reading RG6 6AL, UK ;Harrison, E.; NOAA/PMEL/OCRD, 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 USA ;Heimbach, P.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, MA 02139 USA ;Kamachi, M.; Oceanographic Research Department, Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba 305-0052, Japan. ;Keppenne, C.; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ;Kohl, A.; Institut für Meereskunde, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany ;Masina, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia ;Menemenlis, D.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ;Ponte, R.; Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA ;Remy, E.; Mercator-Océan, 8-10 rue Hermès, 31520 RAMONVILLE ST AGNE, France ;Rienecker, M.; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ;Rosati, A.; NOAA Geophysics Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University Forrestal Campus 201 Forrestal Road, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649, USA ;Schroter, J.; Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Postfach 12 01 61, 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany ;Smith, D.; Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK ;Weaver, A.; Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique, 42 avenue Gaspard Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, France ;Wunsch, C.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge MA 02139 USA ;Xue, Y.; NOAA/National Center for Environmental Prediction/NOAA, 5200 Auth Rd, Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304, USA; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Hall, J.; Nationale Institute of Water and Atmosphere, Hamilton Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zeland ;Harrison, D. E.; NOAA/PMEL/OCRD, 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98125 USA ;Stammer, D.; Institut für Meereskunde, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany; ; Spurred by the sustained operation and new development of satellite and in-situ observing systems, global ocean state estimation efforts that gear towards climate applications have flourished in the past decade. A hierarchy of estimation methods is being used to routinely synthesize various observations with global ocean models. Many of the estimation products are available through public data servers. There have been an increasingly large number of applications of these products for a wide range of research topics in physical oceanography as well as other disciplines. These studies often provide important feedback for observing systems design. This white paper describes the approaches used by these estimation systems in synthesizing observations and model dynamics, highlights the applications of their products for climate research, and addresses the challenges ahead in relation to the observing systems. Additional applications to study climate variability using an ensemble of state estimation products are described also by a white paper by Stammer et al.1751 336 - PublicationOpen AccessOcean information provided through ensemble ocean syntheses(2009-09-21)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Stammer, D.; für Meereskunde, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany, ;Kohl, A.; für Meereskunde, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany, ;Awaji, T.; Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-01 – Japan ;Balmaseda, M.; ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, UK ;Behringer, D.; Climate Prediction Center, NCEP/NOAA, 5200 Auth Road, Room 605, Camp Springs, MD 20746 ;Carton, J.; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, 3413 Computer & Spaces Sci. Bldg., Univ. MD., College Park, MD 20742 ;Ferry, N.; Mercator-Océan, 8-10 rue Hermès, 31520 Ramonville Saint-Agne, France ;Fischer, A.; Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - 1 rue Miollis - 75732 Paris cedex 15 - France ;Fukumori, I.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109 ;Giese, B.; Dept of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA ;Haines, K.; e-Science Centre, ESSC, Harry Pitt Bld, 3 Earley Gate, Reading University, Reading RG6 6AL ;Harrison, E.; NOAA/PMEL/OCRD, 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98125 USA ;Heimbach, P.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge MA 02139 USA ;Kamachi, M.; Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba 305-0052, Japan ;Keppenne, C.; Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 610.1, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ;Lee, T.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109 ;Masina, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia ;Menemenlis, D.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109 ;Ponte, R.; Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., 131 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421-3126 USA ;Remy, E.; Mercator-Océan, 8-10 rue Hermès, 31520 Ramonville Saint-Agne, France ;Rienecker, M.; Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 610.1, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ;Rosati, A.; Geophysics Fluid Dynamics, Princeton University, PO Box 308, Princeton NJ 08540, U.S.A. ;Schroter, J.; ) Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Postfach 12 01 61, 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany ;Smith, D.; Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, UK ;Weaver, A.; ) Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique, 42 avenue Gaspard Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, France ;Wunsch, C.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge MA 02139 USA ;Xue, Y.; Climate Prediction Center, NCEP/NOAA, 5200 Auth Road, Room 605, Camp Springs, MD 20746; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Hall, J.; Nationale Institute of Water and Atmosphere, Hamilton Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zeland ;Harrison, D. E.; ) NOAA/PMEL/OCRD, 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98125 USA ;Stammer, D.; Institut für Meereskunde, KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany; ; Analyzing ocean variability, understanding its importance for the climate system, and quantifying its socio-economic impacts are among the primary motivations for obtaining ongoing global ocean observations. There are several possible approaches to address these tasks. One with much potential for future ocean information services and for climate predictions is called ocean synthesis, and is concerned with merging all available ocean observations with the dynamics embedded in an ocean circulation model to obtain estimates of the changing ocean that are more accurate than either system alone can provide. The field of ocean synthesis has matured over the last decade. Several global ocean syntheses exist today and can be used to investigate key scientific questions, such as changes in sea level, heat content, or transports. This CWP summarizes climate variability as “seen” by several ocean syntheses, describes similarities and differences in these solutions and uses results to highlight developments necessary over the next decade to improve ocean products and services. It appears that multi-model ensemble approaches can be useful to obtain better estimates of the ocean. To make full use of such a system, though, one needs detailed error information not only about data and models, but also about the estimated states. Results show that estimates tend to cluster around methodologies and therefore are not necessarily independent from each other. Results also reveal the impact of a historically under-sampled ocean on estimates of inter-decadal variability in the ocean. To improve future estimates, we need not only to sustain the existing observing system but to extend it to include full-depth ARGO-type measurements, enhanced information about boundary currents and transports through key regions, and to keep all important satellite sensors flying indefinitely, including altimetry, gravimetry and ice thickness, microwave SST observations, wind stress measurements and ocean color. We also need to maintain ocean state estimation as an integral part of the ocean observing and information system.230 268