Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9722
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallBonadonna, C.; Earth and Environmental Sciences Section, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerlanden
dc.contributor.authorallCioni, R.; Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Universita’ di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallPistolesi, M.; Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita’ di Pisa, Pisa, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallConnor, C.; Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USAen
dc.contributor.authorallScollo, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Catania, Catania, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallPioli, L.; Earth and Environmental Sciences Section, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerlanden
dc.contributor.authorallRosi, M.; Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita’ di Pisa, Pisa, Italyen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-03T08:17:15Zen
dc.date.available2015-06-03T08:17:15Zen
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9722en
dc.description.abstractThe distribution of clasts deposited around a volcano during an explosive eruption typically contoured by isopleth maps provides important insights into the associated plume height, wind speed and eruptive style. Nonetheless, a wide range of strategies exists to determine the largest clasts, which can lead to very different results with obvious implications for the characterization of eruptive behaviour of active volcanoes. The IAVCEI Commission on Tephra Hazard Modelling has carried out a dedicated exercise to assess the influence of various strategies on the determination of the largest clasts. Suggestions on the selection of sampling area, collection strategy, choice of clast typologies and clast characterization (i.e. axis measurement and averaging technique) are given, mostly based on a thorough investigation of two outcrops of a Plinian tephra deposit from Cotopaxi volcano (Ecuador) located at different distances from the vent. These include: (1) sampling on a flat paleotopography far from significant slopes to minimize remobilization effects; (2) sampling on specified-horizontal-area sections (with the statistically representative sampling area depending on the outcrop grain size and lithic content); (3) clast characterization based on the geometric mean of its three orthogonal axes with the approximation of the minimum ellipsoid (lithic fragments are better than pumice clasts when present); and (4) use of the method of the 50th percentile of a sample of 20 clasts as the best way to assess the largest clasts. It is also suggested that all data collected for the construction of isopleth maps be made available to the community through the use of a standardized data collection template, to assess the applicability of the new proposed strategy on a large number of deposits and to build a large dataset for the future development and refinement of dispersal models.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of volcanologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/75 (2013)en
dc.subjecttephra depositen
dc.subjectfield strategiesen
dc.titleDetermination of the largest clast sizes of tephra deposits for the characterization of explosive eruptions: a study of the IAVCEI commission on tephra hazard modellingen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber680en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.06. Volcano monitoringen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00445-012-0680-3en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3V. Dinamiche e scenari eruttivien
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextrestricteden
dc.relation.issn0258-8900en
dc.relation.eissn1432-0819en
dc.contributor.authorBonadonna, C.en
dc.contributor.authorCioni, R.en
dc.contributor.authorPistolesi, M.en
dc.contributor.authorConnor, C.en
dc.contributor.authorScollo, S.en
dc.contributor.authorPioli, L.en
dc.contributor.authorRosi, M.en
dc.contributor.departmentEarth and Environmental Sciences Section, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerlanden
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Universita’ di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita’ di Pisa, Pisa, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita’ di Pisa, Pisa, Italyen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2368-2193-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2526-9095-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5096-3708-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8704-8629-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1006-7703-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Bonadonnaetal_2013.pdfMain article946.86 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

28
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

205
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

42
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric