Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/940
Authors: | Ventura, G.* Vilardo, G.* |
Title: | Estimates of fluid pressure and tectonic stress in hydrothermal/volcanic areas:a methodological approach | Issue Date: | 2005 | Series/Report no.: | 4-5/48 (2005) | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2122/940 | Keywords: | hydrothermal fluids faults cracks fluid pressure volcanic/hydrothermal areas seismicity |
Subject Classification: | 04. Solid Earth::04.04. Geology::04.04.01. Earthquake geology and paleoseismology 04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.07. Instruments and techniques |
Abstract: | An analytical approach to estimate the relative contribution of the fluid pressure and tectonic stress in hydrothermal/ volcanic areas is proposed assuming a Coulomb criterion of failure. The analytical procedure requires the coefficient of internal friction, cohesion, rock density, and thickness of overburden to be known from geological data. In addition, the orientation of the principal stress axes and the stress ratio must be determined from the inversion of fault-slip or seismic data (focal mechanisms). At first, the stress magnitude is calculated assuming that faulting occurs in 'dry' conditions (fluid pressure=0). In a second step, the fluid pressure is introduced performing a grid search over the orientation of 1) fault planes that slip by shear failure or 2) cracks that open under different values of fluid pressure and calculating the consistency with the observed fault planes (i.e. strike and dip of faults, cracks, nodal planes from focal mechanisms). The analytical method is applied using fault-slip data from the Solfatara volcano (Campi Flegrei, Italy) and seismic data (focal mechanisms) from the Vesuvius volcano (Italy). In these areas, the fluid pressure required to activate faults (shear fractures) and cracks (open fractures) is calculated. At Solfatara, the ratio between the fluid pressure and the vertical stress ?is very low for faults ( ?=0.16) and relatively high for cracks ( ?=0.5). At Vesuvius, ?=0.6. Limits and uncertainties of the method are also discussed. |
Appears in Collections: | Annals of Geophysics Article published / in press Manuscripts |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
17Ventura.pdf | 888.5 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 50
169
checked on Apr 24, 2024
Download(s) 50
173
checked on Apr 24, 2024