Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9150
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallCheloni, D.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione CNT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.authorallGiuliani, R.; Ufficio Rischio Sismico e Vulcanico, DPC, Roma-
dc.contributor.authorallD'Anastasio, E.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione CNT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.authorallAtzori, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione CNT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.authorallWalters, R. J.; COMET+, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds-
dc.contributor.authorallBonci, L.; ISPRA, Roma-
dc.contributor.authorallD'Agostino, N.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione CNT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.authorallMattone, M.; Ufficio Rischio Sismico e Vulcanico, DPC, Roma-
dc.contributor.authorallCalcaterra, S.; ISPRA, Roma-
dc.contributor.authorallGambino, P.; ISPRA, Roma-
dc.contributor.authorallDeninno, F.; IGM, Firenze-
dc.contributor.authorallMaseroli, R.; IGM, Firenze-
dc.contributor.authorallStefanelli, G.; IGM, Firenze-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-17T14:19:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-17T14:19:37Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9150-
dc.description.abstractAfter the April 6th 2009 MW 6.3 (ML 5.9) L'Aquila earthquake (central Italy), we re-measured more than 100 km of high-precision levelling lines in the epicentral area. The joint inversion of the levelling measurements with InSAR and GPS measurements, allowed us to derive new coseismic and post-seismic slip distributions and to de- scribe, with high resolution details on surface displacements, the activation and the slip distribution of a second- ary fault during the aftershock sequence that struck the Campotosto area (major event MW 5.2). Coseismic slip on the Paganica fault occurred on one main asperity, while the afterslip distribution shows a more complex pattern, occurring on three main patches, including both slips on the shallow portions and on the deeper parts of the rup- ture plane. The comparison between coseismic and post-seismic slip distributions strongly suggests that afterslip was triggered at the edges of the coseismic asperity. The activation of a segment of the Campotosto fault during the aftershock sequence, with a good correlation between the estimated slipping area, moment release and distribution of aftershocks, raises the opportunity to discuss the local seismic hazard following the occurrence of the 2009 L'Aquila mainshock. The Campotosto fault appears capable of generating earthquakes as large as his- torical events in the region (M N 6.5) or as small as the ones associated with the 2009 sequence. In the case that the Campotosto fault is accumulating a significant portion of the current interseismic deformation, the 2009 MW N 5 events will have released only a small amount of the accumulated elastic strain, and then a significant hazard still remains in the area. Continuing geodetic monitoring and a densification of the GPS networks in the region are therefore needed to estimate the tectonic loading across the different recognized active fault systems in this part of the Apennines.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher.nameElsevier Science Limiteden_US
dc.relation.ispartofTectonophysicsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries/622(2014)en_US
dc.subjectHigh-precision leveling; InSAR; GPS; Earthquake source; Normal faulting; Seismic hazarden_US
dc.titleCoseismic and post-seismic slip of the 2009 L'Aquila (central Italy) MW 6.3 earthquake and implications for seismic potential along the Campotosto fault from joint inversion of high-precision levelling, InSAR and GPS dataen_US
dc.typearticle-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.pagenumber168-185en_US
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.03. Geodesy::04.03.01. Crustal deformationsen_US
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.03. Geodesy::04.03.07. Satellite geodesyen_US
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.01. Earthquake faults: properties and evolutionen_US
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken_US
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.07. Tectonophysics::04.07.01. Continentsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.009en_US
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico2T. Tettonica attivaen_US
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen_US
dc.description.fulltextrestricteden
dc.relation.issn0040-1951en_US
dc.relation.eissn1879-3266en_US
dc.contributor.authorCheloni, D.-
dc.contributor.authorGiuliani, R.-
dc.contributor.authorD'Anastasio, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAtzori, S.-
dc.contributor.authorWalters, R. J.-
dc.contributor.authorBonci, L.-
dc.contributor.authorD'Agostino, N.-
dc.contributor.authorMattone, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCalcaterra, S.-
dc.contributor.authorGambino, P.-
dc.contributor.authorDeninno, F.-
dc.contributor.authorMaseroli, R.-
dc.contributor.authorStefanelli, G.-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.departmentUfficio Rischio Sismico e Vulcanico, DPC, Roma-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.departmentCOMET+, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds-
dc.contributor.departmentISPRA, Roma-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
dc.contributor.departmentUfficio Rischio Sismico e Vulcanico, DPC, Roma-
dc.contributor.departmentISPRA, Roma-
dc.contributor.departmentISPRA, Roma-
dc.contributor.departmentIGM, Firenze-
dc.contributor.departmentIGM, Firenze-
dc.contributor.departmentIGM, Firenze-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.author.deptCOMET, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.-
crisitem.author.deptIGM, Firenze-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento Protezione Civile, Roma, Italy-
crisitem.author.deptAgenzia per la Protezione dell'Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici, Via Curtatone, Roma, Italua-
crisitem.author.deptISPRA, Roma-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento Protezione Civile, Ufficio Rischio Sismico-
crisitem.author.deptISPRA, Roma-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIGM, Firenze-
crisitem.author.deptIGM, Firenze-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cheloni_etal_TECTO_2014.pdfmain article4.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 10

315
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on May 27, 2019

Download(s) 50

113
checked on May 27, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric