Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/8902
Authors: | Lombardo, V.* Musacchio, M.* Buongiorno, M. F.* |
Title: | Error analysis of subpixel lava temperature measurements using infrared remotely sensed data | Journal: | Geophysical Journal International | Series/Report no.: | /191(2012) | Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell | Issue Date: | 2012 | DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05632.x | Keywords: | Remote sensing, error analysis, IR sensors, sub-pixel temperature, Numerical solutions; Non-linear differential equations; Effusive volcanism; Eruption mechanisms and flow emplacement; Remote sensing of volcanoes; Volcano monitoring | Subject Classification: | 04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.06. Volcano monitoring | Abstract: | When remote sensing users are asked to define their requirements for a new sensor, the big question that always arises is: will the technical specifications meet the scientific requirements? Herein, we discuss quantitative relationships between instrumental spectral and radiometric characteristics and data exploitable for lava flow subpixel temperature analysis. This study was funded within the framework of ESA activities for the IR GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) element mission requirements in 2005. Subpixel temperature retrieval from satellite infrared data is a well-established method that is well documented in the remote sensing literature. However there is little attention paid to the error analysis on estimated parameters due to atmospheric correction and radiometric accuracy of the sensor. In this study, we suggest the best spectral bands combination to estimate subpixel temperature parameters. We also demonstrate that poor atmospheric corrections may vanish the effectiveness of the most radiometrically accurate instrument. |
Appears in Collections: | Article published / in press |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Existing users please Login |
---|---|---|---|---|
2012-Lombardo_et_al_GJI.pdf | 3.63 MB | Adobe PDF |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
11
checked on Feb 10, 2021
Page view(s)
173
checked on Sep 14, 2024
Download(s)
19
checked on Sep 14, 2024