Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7561
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallLolli, B.; Università di Bolognaen
dc.contributor.authorallGasperini, P.; Università di Bolognaen
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T08:37:19Zen
dc.date.available2012-01-26T08:37:19Zen
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/7561en
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated the efficiency of various models in describing the time decay of aftershock rate of 47 simple sequences occurred in California (37) from 1933 to 2004 and in Italy (10) from 1976 to 2004.We compared the models by the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), both based on the log-likelihood function and also including a penalty term that takes into account the number of independent observations and of free parameters of each model. These criteria follow two different approaches (probabilistic and Bayesian respectively) well covering the wide spectra of current views on model comparison. To evaluate the role of catalog incompleteness in the first times after the main shock, we compared the performance of different models by varying the starting time Ts and the minimum magnitude threshold Mmin for each sequence. We found that Omori-type models including parameter c are preferable to those not including it, only for short Ts and low Mmin while the latters generally perform better than the formers for Ts longer than a few hours and Mmin larger than the main shock magnitude Mm minus 3 units. For TsN1 day or MminNMm−2.5, only about 15% of the sequences still give a preference to models including c. This clearly indicates that a value of parameter c different from zero does not represent a general property of aftershock sequences in California and Italy but it is very likely induced in most cases by catalog incompleteness in the first times after the main shock.We also considered other models of aftershock decay proposed in the literature: the Stretched Exponential Law in two forms (including and not including a time shift) and the band Limited Power Law (LPL).We found that such models perform worse than the Modified Omori Model (MOM) and other Omori-type models for the large majority of sequences, although for LPL, the relatively short duration of the analyzed sequences (one year) might also contribute to its poor performance. Our analysis demonstrates that the MOMwith c kept fixed to 0 represent the better choice for the modeling (and the forecasting) of simple sequence behavior in California and Italy.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofTectonophysicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/423 (2006)en
dc.subjectAftershocks decay; Omori law; Band limited power law; Stretched exponential law; Earthquake catalog incompleteness 1. Introductionen
dc.titleComparing different models of aftershock rate decay: The role of catalog incompleteness in the first times after main shocken
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber43-59en
dc.subject.INGV05. General::05.01. Computational geophysics::05.01.04. Statistical analysisen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorLolli, B.en
dc.contributor.authorGasperini, P.en
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Bolognaen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Bolognaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptUniversità di Bologna-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4186-9055-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5314-0563-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
03_gasperini_lolli_2006_TECT.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

134
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

19
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check