Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7395
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallCultrera, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallAmeri, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallSarao', A.; INOGS, Triesteen
dc.contributor.authorallCirella, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallEmolo, A.; Dip. di Scienze Fisiche, Univ. Federico II, Napolien
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-19T07:48:59Zen
dc.date.available2012-01-19T07:48:59Zen
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/7395en
dc.description.abstractShakeMap package uses empirical Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) to estimate the ground motion where recorded data are not available. Recorded and estimated values are then interpolated in order to produce a shaking map associated with the seismic event of interest. The ShakeMap approach better works in regions with dense stations coverage, where the observed ground motions adequately constrain the interpolation. In poorly instrumented regions, the ground motion estimate mainly relies on the GMPE, that account only for average characteristics of source and wave propagation processes. In this study we investigated the improvement of ShakeMap in the near fault area when including synthetic estimates. We focus on the 2008, Mw 7.0, Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku (Japan) earthquake as a case study because recorded by a huge number of stations. As first we calculated the shakemaps to be used as reference maps and then removed several subsets of stations from the original data-set, replacing them with: (i) the estimations of the ground motion obtained by using a specific GMPE valid for that area, using simple source information such as the earthquake magnitude and fault geometry; (ii) the peak values from synthetic time-histories computed with a hybrid deterministic-stochastic method for extended fault, using the rupture fault model obtained from the kinematic source inversion of strong-motion records. We evaluate the deviations from the reference map and the sensitivity to the number of sites where recordings are not available. Our results show that shakemaps are more and more reliable as the coverage of stations is dense and uniformly distributed in the near-source area. Moreover, the synthetics account for propagation and source properties in a more correct way than GMPE, and largely improve the results. The hybrid maps reach good fitting levels especially when synthetics are used to integrate real data and for particular strong-motion parameters and stations’ distribution.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofGeophysical Journal Internationalen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/193 (2013)en
dc.subjectground motion simulationen
dc.subjectShakemapen
dc.subject2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquakeen
dc.subject1980 Irpinia earthquakeen
dc.titleGround-motion simulations within ShakeMap methodology: application to the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku (Japan) and 1980 Irpinia (Italy) earthquakesen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber220-237en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/gji/ggs074en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.1. Metodologie sismologiche per l'ingegneria sismicaen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextpartially_openen
dc.contributor.authorCultrera, G.en
dc.contributor.authorAmeri, G.en
dc.contributor.authorSarao', A.en
dc.contributor.authorCirella, A.en
dc.contributor.authorEmolo, A.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentINOGS, Triesteen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDip. di Scienze Fisiche, Univ. Federico II, Napolien
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptOGS, CRS Department-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, UniversitĂ  Federico II, Napoli, Italy-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3335-5655-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5734-5702-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4144-3794-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8390-4168-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Cultrera_et-al_subGJI2011.pdf2.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Cultrera_GJI2013.pdf15.87 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

12
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

302
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 20

392
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric