Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/5741
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallVichi, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallMasina, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-21T16:03:42Zen
dc.date.available2010-01-21T16:03:42Zen
dc.date.issued2009-11-02en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/5741en
dc.description.abstractGlobal Ocean Biogeochemistry General Circulation Models are useful tools to study biogeochemical processes at global and large scales under current climate and future scenario conditions. The credibility of future estimates is however dependent on the model skill in capturing the observed multi-annual variability of firstly the mean bulk biogeochemical properties, and secondly the rates at which organic matter is processed within the food web. For this double purpose, the results of a multi-annual simulation of the global ocean biogeochemical model PELAGOS have been objectively compared with multi-variate observations from the last 20 years of the 20th century, both considering bulk variables and carbon production/consumption rates. Simulated net primary production (NPP) is comparable with satellite-derived estimates at the global scale and when compared with an independent data-set of in situ observations in the equatorial Pacific. The usage of objective skill indicators allowed us to demonstrate the importance of comparing like with like when considering carbon transformation processes. NPP scores improve substantially when in situ data are compared with modeled NPP which takes into account the excretion of freshly-produced dissolved organic carbon (DOC). It is thus recommended that DOC measurements be performed during in situ NPP measurements to quantify the actual production of organic carbon in the surface ocean. The chlorophyll bias in the Southern Ocean that affects this model as well as several others is linked to the inadequate representation of the mixed layer seasonal cycle in the region. A sensitivity experiment confirms that the artificial increase of mixed layer depths towards the observed values substantially reduces the bias. Our assessment results qualify the model for studies of carbon transformation in the surface ocean and metabolic balances. Within the limits of the model assumption and known biases, PELAGOS indicates a net heterotrophic balance especially in the more oligotrophic regions of the Atlantic during the boreal winter period. However, at the annual time scale and over the global ocean, the model suggests that the surface ocean is close to a weakly positive autotrophic balance in accordance with recent experimental findings and geochemical considerations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCentro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici, Bologna, Italyen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameCopernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Unionen
dc.relation.ispartofBiogeosciencesen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/6(2009)en
dc.subjectgeneral circulation modelen
dc.subjectbiogeochemical modelen
dc.subjectBFMen
dc.subjectPELAGOSen
dc.subjectglobal oceanen
dc.subjectocean metabolismen
dc.titleSkill assessment of the PELAGOS global ocean biogeochemistry model over the period 1980–2000en
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber2333–2353en
dc.identifier.URLhttp://www.biogeosciences.net/6/2333/2009en
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.01. General::03.01.01. Analytical and numerical modelingen
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.01. General::03.01.02. Equatorial and regional oceanographyen
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.01. General::03.01.07. Physical and biogeochemical interactionsen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3.7. Dinamica del clima e dell'oceanoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorVichi, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMasina, S.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6273-7065-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
bg-6-2333-2009.pdfMain article2.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
bg-6-2333-2009-supplement.pdfSupplement98.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 5

479
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 20

348
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check