Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/5603
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallPessina, V.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallMeroni, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-14T10:44:25Zen
dc.date.available2010-01-14T10:44:25Zen
dc.date.issued2009-09en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/5603en
dc.description.abstractThe WebGis development represents a natural answer to the growing requests for dissemination and use of geographical information data. WebGis originates from a combination of web technology and the Geographical Information System, which is a recognised technology that is mainly composed of data handling tools for storage, recovery, management and analysis of spatial data. Here, we illustrate two examples of seismic hazard and risk analysis through the WebGis system in terms of architecture and content. The first presents ground shaking scenarios associated with the repetition of the earthquake that struck the Lake of Garda area (northern Italy) in 2004. The second shows data and results of a more extensive analysis of seismic risk in the western part of the Liguria region (north-western Italy) for residential buildings, strategic structures and historic architecture. The adoption of a freeware application (ALOVMap) assures easy exportability of the WebGis structures for projects dealing with natural hazard evaluation.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineeringen
dc.relation.ispartofseries9/29 (2009)en
dc.subjectWebGisen
dc.subjectAloven
dc.subjectearthquake scenariosen
dc.subjectseismic hazarden
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten
dc.titleA WebGis tool for seismic hazard scenarios and risk analysisen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber1274-1281en
dc.subject.INGV05. General::05.02. Data dissemination::05.02.02. Seismological dataen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.03.001en
dc.relation.references[1] Sui DZ, Goodchild MF. GIS as media? Int. J. Geographical Information Science 2001; 15(5): 387- 390. [2] Yang C, Wong DW, Yang R, Kafatos M, Li Q. Performance-improving techniques in web-based GIS. Int. J. Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(3): 319- 342. [3] Martinelli F, Meletti C. A WebGIS application for rendering seismic hazard data in Italy. Seismological Research Letters 2008; 79 (1): 68-78. [4] Qu C, Ye H, Liu Z. Application of WebGIS in seismological study, Acta Seismologica Sinica 2002; 15 (1): 99-106. [5] Hara S, Ishikawa M, Koyama M, Satake K, Tsuji Y, Hayakawa Y, Ebara M, Sasamoto S, Takahashi M, Tarashima S, Fujita A, Yata T, Ishibashi K. Application of GIS to historical earthquakes documents in Japan. In: PNC 2005 Annual Conference in Conjunction with PRDLA, ECAI, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 2005. [6] Grandori, G, Drei A, Perotti F, Tagliani A. Macroseismic intensity versus epicentral distance: the case of central Italy. Tectonophysics 1991; 193: 165-171. [7] Faccioli, E, Cauzzi, C. Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios, estimated from instrumentally based correlations. In: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland 2006; Paper Number 569 [8] Sabetta F, Pugliese A. Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer.1996; 86(2): 337-352. [9] Pacor F, Cultrera G, Mendez A, Cocco M. Finite Fault Modeling of Strong Motion Using a Hybrid Deterministic-Stochastic Approach, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 2005; 95 (1): 225-240. [10] Bernard P, Madariaga R. A new asymptotic method for the modeling of near field accelerograms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 1984; 74(2): 539-557. [11] Spudich P, Frazer NL. Use of ray theory to calculate high-frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially variable rupture velocity and stress drop. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer.. 1984; 74(6): 2061-2082. [12] Boore DM. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl. Geophys.2003; 160: 635-676. [13] Pessina V, Franceschina G, Vannoli P, Luzi L, Pacor F. Damage distribution and seismological model of the November 2004, Salò (Northen Italy) earthquake. In: Proceeding of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switerland 2006; Paper Number 1371. [14] Franceschina G, Pessina V, Di Giacomo D, Massa M, Mulargia F, Castellaro S, Mucciarelli M. La ricostruzione dello scuotimento del terremoto del Garda (Nord Italia) del 2004 (ML=5.2), Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana,(in press). [14] QUEST (Quick Earthquake Survey Team). Rilievo macrosismico del terremoto del Garda del 24 novembre 2004, Ingegneria Sismica 2005; Anno XXII(2): 44-59. [15] Pessina V, Balbi A. Il Gis a supporto della valutazione di rischio sismico: un approccio integrato a diversa scala territoriale ed ampio campo di indagine. In: Proceeding of the Convegno Nazionale Rischio sismico, territorio e centri storici, Sanremo, Imperia 2004: 349-356. [16] Hisada Y, Bielak J. A theoretical method for computing near fault ground motion in a layered half-spaces considering static offset due to surface faulting, with a physical interpretation of fling step and rupture directivity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 2003; 93 (3): 1154-1168. [17] Istat. XIII Censimento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Roma 1991. [18] Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S. A methodology for the vulnerability analysis of Built-up Areas. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Earthquake Loss Estimation and Risk Reduction, Bucharest, Romania, October 2002 [19] Faccioli E, Vanini M, Frassine L. Complex” site effects in earthquake ground motion, including topography. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London 2002; Paper Number 844.en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico5.5. TTC - Sistema Informativo Territorialeen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorPessina, V.en
dc.contributor.authorMeroni, F.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3772-7030-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0403-3374-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
WEBGIS.pdfMain article818.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

18
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

355
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 5

1,450
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric