Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/5359
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallBindi, D.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallLuzi, L.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallPacor, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-23T08:50:21Zen
dc.date.available2009-12-23T08:50:21Zen
dc.date.issued2009-08en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/5359en
dc.description.abstractThe interevent and interstation ground-motion variability of the updated Italian strong-motion database (Italian Accelerometric Archive [ITACA]) has been explored through the development of new empirical ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for Italy. The regressions have been performed on 241 three-component waveforms from 27 earthquakes with moment magnitudes ranging from 4.8 to 6.9, recorded by 146 stations at distances up to 200 km. The site classification follows the schemes previously proposed for Italy, in which two soil classes are defined, considering both shear-wave velocity and deposit thickness. The regression analysis uses the values of the explanatory variables (magnitude, fault distance, site class, and style of faulting) recently revised in the framework of a project funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection. The equations have been derived for peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and 5% damped spectral accelerations at 18 periods from 0.03 to 2 sec. The residual variance has been decomposed into interevent, interstation, and record-to-record components by applying a random effect regression scheme. The interevent and interstation error distributions have been analyzed as function of periods to detect sites and events for which predicted values significantly deviate from observations. For periods up to 0.35 sec, the interstation is the dominant component of variance, indicating that an improvement in the site classification could lead to a refinement of the GMPEs. For longer periods, the three components of variance provide similar contributions, indicating that a reduction of the uncertainty can be achieved by reducing the epistemic uncertainty affecting the physical model. The interevent error highlights the peculiarity of few earthquakes, suggesting that the evaluation of regional GMPEs can be important when specific scenario studies should be carried out. The interstation variability allows us to detect stations with peculiar site response and to assess the goodness of the considered site classification scheme. Introduction In Italy, strong-motion recordings have been available since the early 1970s. Because different institutions managed the Italian strong-motion network (Rete accelerometrica italiana [RAN]), both waveforms and metadata needed to qualify the recordings are hardly available to end-users, except for few cases, such as the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marche sequence and the 2002 Molise earthquakes (see the Data and Resources section). The Italian Dipartimento di Protezione Civile (Italian Department for Civil Protection [DPC]) after an agreement with the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (Italian Institute for Geophysics and Volcanology [INGV]) funded in 2004 the project called “Database dei dati accelerometrici italiani relativi al periodo 1972–2004” (Italian strong-motion database relevant to the period 1972–2004, hereinafter referred to as project S6,en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSeismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin Of The Seismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries4/99 (2009)en
dc.subjectVariabilityen
dc.subjectITACAen
dc.titleInterevent and Interstation Variability Computed for the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA)en
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber2471–2488en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120080209en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.1. Metodologie sismologiche per l'ingegneria sismicaen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorBindi, D.en
dc.contributor.authorLuzi, L.en
dc.contributor.authorPacor, F.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8619-2220-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4312-580X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5745-0414-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
BSSA-D-08-00209.fdfMain article2.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

13
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

108
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 10

581
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric