Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/5143
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallCamarda, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallGurrieri, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallValenza, M.; Dipartimento di Chimica e Fisica della Terra ed Applicazioni, Università di Palermoen
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-10T10:34:20Zen
dc.date.available2009-08-10T10:34:20Zen
dc.date.issued2009-07-30en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/5143en
dc.description.abstractDynamic accumulation chamber methods have been extensively used to estimate the total output of CO2 released from active volcanic area. In order to asses the performance and reliability of a closed dynamic system several tests were carried out with different soil permeabilities and soil CO2 fluxes. A special device was used to create a constant one-dimensional CO2 flux through a soil column with a known permeability. Three permeabilities were investigated, ranging between 3.6 × 10− 2 and 3.5 × 10 μm2, as were several CO2 fluxes (ranging between 1.1 × 10− 6 and 6.3 × 10− 5 kg m− 2 s− 1). The results highlight that the accuracy of soil CO2 flux measurements strictly depends on the soil gas permeability and the soil CO2 flux regimen. Generally chamber measurements underestimate CO2 fluxes at low soil permeability and low soil CO2 fluxes, whereas appreciable overestimations occur for high permeability soil, especially for high soil CO2 fluxes. Other tests carried out with different settings for the measurement device, such as the chamber volume and the flux of the pump used to recirculate air through the chamber and the gas analyzer (recirculation flux), revealed a strong dependence of the closed dynamic chamber measurements on the recirculation flux. Low recirculation fluxes (0.2–0.4 l min− 1) decreased the performance of the measurement system, causing underestimations of the actual soil CO2 flux, whereas higher values (0.6–1.0 l min− 1) resulted in overestimations, especially for elevated soil CO2 fluxes. An empirical equation was deduced to allow accumulation chamber fluxes to be calculated very accurately based on soil gas permeabilities measured in the field.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofChemical Geologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries3-4/265(2009)en
dc.subjectSoil CO2 flux measuramentsen
dc.subjectClosed dynamic chamberen
dc.subjectsoil gas permeabilityen
dc.titleEffects of soil gas permeability and recirculation flux on soil CO2 flux measurements performed using a closed dynamic accumulation chamberen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber387-393en
dc.identifier.URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.05.002en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.02. Exploration geophysics::04.02.01. Geochemical explorationen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.04. Geology::04.04.12. Fluid Geochemistryen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.01. Gasesen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.06. Volcano monitoringen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.07. Instruments and techniquesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.05.002en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico1.2. TTC - Sorveglianza geochimica delle aree vulcaniche attiveen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.5. Studi sul degassamento naturale e sui gas petroliferien
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorCamarda, M.en
dc.contributor.authorGurrieri, S.en
dc.contributor.authorValenza, M.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Chimica e Fisica della Terra ed Applicazioni, Università di Palermoen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDiSTeM, Universit a degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1527-7910-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4085-0440-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Camarda et al.pdfMain article440.29 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

15
checked on Feb 7, 2021

Page view(s) 50

220
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

27
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric