Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4638
Authors: Pittarello, L.* 
Di Toro, G.* 
Bizzarri, A.* 
Pennacchioni, G.* 
Hadizadeh, J.* 
Cocco, M.* 
Title: Energy partitioning during seismic slip in pseudotachylyte-bearing faults
Issue Date: 19-Feb-2008
Series/Report no.: /269 (2008)
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.052
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4638
Keywords: Fracture energy
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.01. Earth Interior::04.01.04. Mineral physics and properties of rocks 
Abstract: The determination of the earthquake energy budget remains a challenging issue for Earth scientists, as understanding the partitioning of energy is a key towards the understanding the physics of earthquakes. Here we estimate the partition of the mechanical work density into heat and surface energy (energy required to create new fracture surface) during seismic slip on a location along a fault. Earthquake energy partitioning is determined from field and microstructural analyses of a fault segment decorated by pseudotachylyte (solidified friction-induced melt produced during seismic slip) exhumed from a depth of ~10 km—typical for earthquake hypocenters in the continental crust. Frictional heat per unit fault area estimated from the thickness of pseudotachylytes is ~27 MJ m−2. Surface energy, estimated from microcrack density inside clast (i.e., cracked grains) entrapped in the pseudotachylyte and in the fault wall rock, ranges between 0.10 and 0.85 MJ m−2. Our estimates for the studied fault segment suggest that ~97–99% of the energy was dissipated as heat during seismic slip. We conclude that at 10 km depth, less than 3% of the total mechanical work density is adsorbed as surface energy on the fault plane during earthquake rupture.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
08040815394618192.pdf3.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

78
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Aug 17, 2018

Download(s)

23
checked on Aug 17, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric