Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3950
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.authorall | De Santis, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Barraclough, D.; British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Main Rd., EH9 3LA Edinburgh, UK | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Tozzi, R.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-07-10T06:42:00Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-10T06:42:00Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3950 | en |
dc.description.abstract | A nonlinear forecasting analysis has been applied to the secular variation of the three-component annual means of 14 observatories, unevenly distributed over the Earth's surface (12 in the northern and 2 in the southern hemisphere) and spanning the last 150 years. All results were in agreement, either in terms of possible evidence of chaos (as opposed to the hypothesis of white or colored noise), or in terms of the Kolmogorov entropy, confirming previous results obtained with only three European observatories, i.e. it is practically impossible to predict the secular variation of the geomagnetic field more than six years into the future. | en |
dc.language.iso | English | en |
dc.publisher.name | World Scientific Publishing Company | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Fractals | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 3 / 10 (2002) | en |
dc.subject | Geomagnetic Field | en |
dc.subject | Secular Variation | en |
dc.subject | Nonlinear Forecasting | en |
dc.subject | Chaos | en |
dc.title | Nonlinear Variability in the Geomagnetic Secular Variation of the Last 150 Years | en |
dc.type | article | en |
dc.description.status | Published | en |
dc.type.QualityControl | Peer-reviewed | en |
dc.description.pagenumber | 297-303 | en |
dc.subject.INGV | 04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.02. Geomagnetic field variations and reversals | en |
dc.subject.INGV | 04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.05. Main geomagnetic field | en |
dc.relation.references | 1. Abarbanel H. D. I., Analysis of observed chaotic data (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996). 2. Baker, L. G., Gollub, J. P., Chaotic dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 182., 1990. 3. Barraclough D. R. and De Santis, A., Some possible evidence for a chaotic geomagnetic field from observational data. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 99 (1997), pp. 207-220. 4. Cafarella L., De Santis A. and Meloni A., Secular variation in Italy from historical geomagnetic field measurements. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 73 (1992), pp. 206-221. 5. Currie R. G., Geomagnetic time spectrum. Atmos. Space Sc., 21 (1973), pp. 425-438. 6. De Michelis P., Consolini G. and Meloni A., Sign Singularity in the Secular Acceleration of the Geomagnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, pp. 5023-5026. 7. Farmer, J. D. and Sidorowich, J. J., Predicting chaotic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59 (1987), pp. 845-848. 8. Fowler A.D., and Roach, D.E., Dimensionality analysis of time-series data: nonlinear methods. Comp. & Geosc., 19 (1993), pp. 41-52. 9. Grassberger P. and Procaccia I., Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D, 9 (1983), pp. 189-208. 10. Langel, R. A., The Main Field, Chapter 4. In Geomagnetism, Vol. 1., ed. by J. A. Jacobs (Academic Press, London, 1987), pp. 249-512. 11. Marzocchi W., Mulargia F. and Gonzato G., Detecting low-dimensional chaos in geophysical time. J. Geoph. Res., 102, NO. B2 (1997), pp. 3195-3209. 12. Osborne A.R., and Provenzale A., Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra. Physica D, 35 (1989), pp. 357-381. 13. Procaccia I., Complex or just complicated? Nature, 339 (1988), pp.498-499. 14. Robbins K.A., A new approach to subcritical instability and turbulent transitions in a simple dynamo. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 82 (1977), pp. 309-325. 15. Rotanova N. M., Papitashvili N. Ye., Pushkov A. N., Interpretation of 60-year variations in the geomagnetic field as a quasi-harmonic process. Geomagn. & Aeronomy., 22 (1982), pp. 733-735. 16. Rotanova N. M., Papitashvili N. Ye., Filippov S. V. and Chernova T. A., Identification and analysis of 60-year variations of the geomagnetic field from the time-series of spherical harmonics. Geomagn. & Aeron., 23 (1983), pp. 673-679 (in English translation); pp. 829-836 (in Russian). 17. Sugihara G. and May R. M., Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature, 344 (1990), pp. 734-741. 18. Takens F., Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In Lecture notes in mathematics, ed. by D. A. Rand and L. S. Young , Vol. 898 (Springer, Berlin, 1981), pp. 366-381. 19. Theiler J., Eubank S., Longtin A., Galdrikian B. and Farmer J. D., Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58 (1992), pp. 77-94. 20. Tsonis A. A. and Elsner J. B., Nonlinear prediction as a way of distinguishing chaos from random fractal sequences. Nature, 358 (1992), pp. 217-220. 21. Wales D. J., Calculating the rate of loss of information from chaotic time series by forecasting. Nature, 350 (1991), pp. 485-488. | en |
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico | 3.4. Geomagnetismo | en |
dc.description.journalType | N/A or not JCR | en |
dc.description.fulltext | reserved | en |
dc.contributor.author | De Santis, A. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Barraclough, D. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Tozzi, R. | en |
dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.department | British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Main Rd., EH9 3LA Edinburgh, UK | en |
dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia | en |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia | - |
crisitem.author.dept | British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, U. K. | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-3941-656X | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-1836-4078 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.classification.parent | 04. Solid Earth | - |
crisitem.classification.parent | 04. Solid Earth | - |
crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
Appears in Collections: | Article published / in press |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Existing users please Login |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fractals_2002.pdf | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
Page view(s) 50
171
checked on Apr 24, 2024
Download(s)
34
checked on Apr 24, 2024