Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3950
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallDe Santis, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallBarraclough, D.; British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Main Rd., EH9 3LA Edinburgh, UKen
dc.contributor.authorallTozzi, R.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-10T06:42:00Zen
dc.date.available2008-07-10T06:42:00Zen
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/3950en
dc.description.abstractA nonlinear forecasting analysis has been applied to the secular variation of the three-component annual means of 14 observatories, unevenly distributed over the Earth's surface (12 in the northern and 2 in the southern hemisphere) and spanning the last 150 years. All results were in agreement, either in terms of possible evidence of chaos (as opposed to the hypothesis of white or colored noise), or in terms of the Kolmogorov entropy, confirming previous results obtained with only three European observatories, i.e. it is practically impossible to predict the secular variation of the geomagnetic field more than six years into the future.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameWorld Scientific Publishing Companyen
dc.relation.ispartofFractalsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries3 / 10 (2002)en
dc.subjectGeomagnetic Fielden
dc.subjectSecular Variationen
dc.subjectNonlinear Forecastingen
dc.subjectChaosen
dc.titleNonlinear Variability in the Geomagnetic Secular Variation of the Last 150 Yearsen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber297-303en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.02. Geomagnetic field variations and reversalsen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.05. Main geomagnetic fielden
dc.relation.references1. Abarbanel H. D. I., Analysis of observed chaotic data (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996). 2. Baker, L. G., Gollub, J. P., Chaotic dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 182., 1990. 3. Barraclough D. R. and De Santis, A., Some possible evidence for a chaotic geomagnetic field from observational data. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 99 (1997), pp. 207-220. 4. Cafarella L., De Santis A. and Meloni A., Secular variation in Italy from historical geomagnetic field measurements. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 73 (1992), pp. 206-221. 5. Currie R. G., Geomagnetic time spectrum. Atmos. Space Sc., 21 (1973), pp. 425-438. 6. De Michelis P., Consolini G. and Meloni A., Sign Singularity in the Secular Acceleration of the Geomagnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, pp. 5023-5026. 7. Farmer, J. D. and Sidorowich, J. J., Predicting chaotic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59 (1987), pp. 845-848. 8. Fowler A.D., and Roach, D.E., Dimensionality analysis of time-series data: nonlinear methods. Comp. & Geosc., 19 (1993), pp. 41-52. 9. Grassberger P. and Procaccia I., Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D, 9 (1983), pp. 189-208. 10. Langel, R. A., The Main Field, Chapter 4. In Geomagnetism, Vol. 1., ed. by J. A. Jacobs (Academic Press, London, 1987), pp. 249-512. 11. Marzocchi W., Mulargia F. and Gonzato G., Detecting low-dimensional chaos in geophysical time. J. Geoph. Res., 102, NO. B2 (1997), pp. 3195-3209. 12. Osborne A.R., and Provenzale A., Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra. Physica D, 35 (1989), pp. 357-381. 13. Procaccia I., Complex or just complicated? Nature, 339 (1988), pp.498-499. 14. Robbins K.A., A new approach to subcritical instability and turbulent transitions in a simple dynamo. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 82 (1977), pp. 309-325. 15. Rotanova N. M., Papitashvili N. Ye., Pushkov A. N., Interpretation of 60-year variations in the geomagnetic field as a quasi-harmonic process. Geomagn. & Aeronomy., 22 (1982), pp. 733-735. 16. Rotanova N. M., Papitashvili N. Ye., Filippov S. V. and Chernova T. A., Identification and analysis of 60-year variations of the geomagnetic field from the time-series of spherical harmonics. Geomagn. & Aeron., 23 (1983), pp. 673-679 (in English translation); pp. 829-836 (in Russian). 17. Sugihara G. and May R. M., Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature, 344 (1990), pp. 734-741. 18. Takens F., Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In Lecture notes in mathematics, ed. by D. A. Rand and L. S. Young , Vol. 898 (Springer, Berlin, 1981), pp. 366-381. 19. Theiler J., Eubank S., Longtin A., Galdrikian B. and Farmer J. D., Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58 (1992), pp. 77-94. 20. Tsonis A. A. and Elsner J. B., Nonlinear prediction as a way of distinguishing chaos from random fractal sequences. Nature, 358 (1992), pp. 217-220. 21. Wales D. J., Calculating the rate of loss of information from chaotic time series by forecasting. Nature, 350 (1991), pp. 485-488.en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3.4. Geomagnetismoen
dc.description.journalTypeN/A or not JCRen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorDe Santis, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBarraclough, D.en
dc.contributor.authorTozzi, R.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentBritish Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Main Rd., EH9 3LA Edinburgh, UKen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptBritish Geological Survey, Edinburgh, U. K.-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3941-656X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1836-4078-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Fractals_2002.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

171
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check