Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3521
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallVizán, H.; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentinaen
dc.contributor.authorallVan Zele, M. A.; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentinaen
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-31T09:32:21Zen
dc.date.available2007-12-31T09:32:21Zen
dc.date.issued2007-04en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/3521en
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this paper is to show that the distribution of transitional palaeomagnetic data recorded at 250 Ma are in agreement with simulated data that depend on the sampling site, using a model that considers features of the Present Earth magnetic field. The analysis was performed comparing simulated reversals with the Permo-Triassic polarity transition recorded in the Siberian Trap Basalts. The palaeomagnetic data were corrected according to the Palaeo-latitude and Palaeo-longitude of Siberia (absolute reconstruction) at 250 Ma using hotspot tracks. To obtain the motion of Siberia relative to hotspots from the Present time back to 250 Ma, three different Pangaea models were considered (Pangaea A, Pangaea A2, Pangaea B). In spite of the uncertainties associated with the use of hotspot frameworks and Pangaea configurations, both the modelled and recorded data show a remarkable fit when absolute reconstructions of Pangaea A and A2 configurations are performed. The agreement between both simulated and recorded data suggests that similar features to that of the Present Earth magnetic field could have been involved in reversals since the Permo-Triassic.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2/50 (2007)en
dc.subjectPermo-Triassicen
dc.subjectPangaeaen
dc.subjectabsolute reconstructionen
dc.subjectEarth magnetic fielden
dc.subjectpolarity transitionen
dc.titleAnalysis of a Permo-Triassic polarity transition in different absolute reconstructions of Pangaea, considering a model with features of the present Earth magnetic fielden
dc.typearticleen
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.02. Geomagnetic field variations and reversalsen
dc.relation.referencesBESSE, J. and V. COURTILLOT (2002): Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Myr, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (B11), 2300, doi: 10.1029/2000, JB 000050. BRIDEN, J.C., A.G. SMITH and J.T. SALLOMY (1971): The geomagnetic field in Permo-Triassic time, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 23, 101-118. BULLARD, E.C, J.E. EVERITT and A.G. SMITH (1965): The fit of continents around the Atlantic, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 258, 41-51. CLEMENT, B.M. (1991): Geographical distribution of transitional VGPs-Evidence for non-zonal equatorial symmetry during the Matuyama Brunhes geomagnetic reversal, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 104, 48-58. COE, R.S. and J.M.G. GLEN (2004): The complexity of reversals, in Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field (Am. Geophys. Un.), Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 145, 221-232. COE, R.S., L. HONGRE and G.A. GLATZMAIER (2000): An examination of simulated geomagnetic reversals from a palaeomagnetic perspective, Philos. Trans. R. Astron. Soc. London Ser. A, 358, 1141-1170. COX, A. V. and B.R. HART (1986): Plate Tectonics: How it Works (Blackwell Scientific, Palo Alto), pp. 392. ENGEBRETSON, D.C., A. COX and R.G. GORDON (1985): Relative motions between oceanic and continental plates in the Pacific Basin, Geol. Soc. Am., Spec. Pap. 206, pp. 59. GLATZMAIER, G.A., R.S. COE, L. HONGRE and P.H. ROBERTS (1999): The role of the Earth’s mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals, Nature, 401, 885- 890. GUBBINS, D. (1987): Mechanism for geomagnetic polarity reversals, Nature, 326, 167-169. GUBBINS, D. (1994): Geomagnetic polarity reversals: a connection with secular variation and core-mantle boundary interaction?, Rev. Geophys., 32, 61-83. GUBBINS, D. and R.S. COE (1993): Longitudinally confined geomagnetic reversal paths from non-dipolar transition fields, Nature, 362, 51-53. GUREVITCH, E.L., M. WESTPHAL, J. DARAGAN-SUCHOV, H. FEINBERG, J.P. POZZI and A.N. KHRAMOV (1995): Paleomagnetism and magnetostratigraphy of the traps from Western Taimyr (Northern Siberia) and the Permo-Triassic crisis, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 136 (3-4), 461-473. GUREVITCH, E.L., C. HEUNEMANN, V. RAD’KO, M. WESTPHAL, V. BACHTADSE, J.P. POZZI and H. FEINBERG (2004): Palaeomagnetism and magnetostratigraphy of the Permian-Triassic northwest Central Siberian Trap Basalts, Tectonophysics, 379, 211-226. HALLAM, A. (1983): Supposed Permo-Triassic megashear between Laurasia and Gondwana, Nature, 301, 499-502. HEUNEMANN, C., D. KRÁSA, H.C. SOFFEL, E. GUREVITCH and V. BACHTADSE (2004): Directions and intensities of the Earth’s magnetic field during a reversal: results from the Permo-Triassic Siberian Trap Basalts, Russia, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 218, 197-213. HOFFMAN, K.A. (1992): Dipolar reversal states of the geomagnetic field and core-mantle dynamics, Nature, 359, 789-794. IRVING, E. (2004): The case for Pangea B, and the intra- Pangean megashear, in Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field (Am. Geophys. Un.), Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 145, 13-27. KLITGORD, K.D. and H. SCHOUTEN (1986): Plate kinematics of the Central Atlantic, in The Geology of North America, The Western North Atlantic Region, edited by P.R. VOGT and H. TUCHOLKE (Geol. Soc. Am., New York), 351-378. LAJ, C., A. MAZAUD, R. WEEKS, M. FULLER and E. HERRERO- BERVERA (1991): Geomagnetic reversal paths, Nature, 351, 447. LANGEREIS, C.G., A.A. VAN HOOF and P. ROCHETTE (1992): Longitudinal confinement of geomagnetic reversal paths as a possible sedimentary artefact, Nature, 358, 226-229. LOVE, J.J. (1998): Paleomagnetic volcanic data and geometric regularity of reversals and excursions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12,435-12,452. MCELHINNY, M. (2004): Geocentric axial dipole hypothesis: a least squares perspective, in Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field (Am. Geophys. Un.), Geophys. Monogr. Ser. , 145, 1-12. MCFADDEN, P. L. and F.J. LOWES (1981): The discrimination of mean directions drawn from Fisher distributions, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 67, 19-33. MOREL, P. and E. IRVING (1981): Paleomagnetism and the evolution of Pangea, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1858-1872. MORGAN, W.J. (1983): Hotspot tracks and early rifting of the Atlantic, Tectonophysics, 94, 123-139. MUTTONI, G., D.V. KENT and J.E.T. CHANNELL (1996): Evolution of Pangea, paleomagnetic constraints from the Southern Alps, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 140, 97-112. MUTTONI, G., D.V.KENT, E. GARZANI, P. BRACK, N. ABRAHAMSEN and M. GAETANI (2003): The mid-Permian revolution from Pangea ‘B’ to ‘A’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 215, 379-394. O’NEILL, C., D. MÜLLER and B. STEINBERGER (2005): On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot frames, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 6, 1-35. PRÉVOT, M. and P. CAMPS (1993): Absence of preferred longitudinal sectors for poles from volcanic records of geomagnetic reversals, Nature, 366, 53-57. PRÉVOT, M., N. ROBERTS, J. THOMPSON, L. FAYNOT and M. PERRIN (2003): Revisiting the Jurassic geomagnetic reversal recorded in the Lesotho Basalt (Southern Africa), Geophys. J. Inter., 155, 367-378. RAKOTOSOLOFO, N.A., J.A. TAIT, V. CARLOTTO and J. CÁRDENAS (2005): Palaeomagnetic results from the Early Permian Copacabana Group, Southern Peru: implication for Pangaea palaeogeography, Tectonophysics, 413, 287-299. ROCHETTE, P. and D. VANDAMME (2001): Pangea B: an artefact of incorrect paleomagnetic assumptions?, Ann. Geofis., 44 (3), 649-658. SCHETTINO, A. and C.R. SCOTESE (2005): Apparent polar wander paths for the major continents (200 Ma to the present day): a palaeomagnetic reference frame for global plate tectonic reconstructions, Geophys. J. Inter., 163, 727-759. SMETHURST, M.A., A.N. KHRAMOV and T.H. TORSVIK (1998): The Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic data for the Siberina Platform: from Rodinia to Pangea, Earth- Sci. Rev., 43, 1-24. SMITH, A.G. and R.A. LIVERMORE (1991): Pangea in Permian to Jurassic time, Tectonophysics, 187, 135-179. TORCQ, F., J. BESSE, D. VASLET, J. MARCOUX, L.E. RICOU, M. HALAWANI and M. BASAHEL (1997): Paleomagntic results from Saudi Arabia and the Permo-Triassic Pangea configuration, Earth Planet. Sci Lett., 148, 553-567. TORSVIK, T.H. and T.B. ANDERSEN (2002): The Taimyr Fold Belt, Arctic Siberia: timing of pre-fold remagnetisation and regional tectonics, Tectonophysics, 352, 335-348. TORSVIK, T.H. and R. VAN DER VOO (2002): Refining Gondwana and Pangea palaeogeography: estimates of Phanerozoic non-dipole (octupole) fields, Geophys. J. Inter., 151, 771-794. TORSVIK, T.H., R. VAN DER VOO, J.G. MEERT, J. MOSAR and H. WALDERHAUG (2001): Reconstructions of the continents around the North Atlantic at about the 60th parallel, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 187, 55-69. TORSVIK, T.H, R. VAN DER VOO and T.F. REDFIELD (2002): Relative hotspot motions versus true polar wander, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 202 (2), 185-200. VAN DER VOO, R. (1990): Phanerozoic paleomagnetic poles from Europe and North America and comparisons with continental reconstructions, Rev. Geophys., 28, 167- 206. VAN DER VOO, R. and R.B. FRENCH (1974): Apparent polar wandering for the Atlantic bordering continents: Late Carboniferous to Eocene, Earth Sci. Rev., 10, 99-119. VAN DER VOO, R. and T.H. TORSVIK (2001): Evidence for late Paleozoic and Mesozoic non-dipole fields provides an explanation for the Pangea reconstruction problems, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 187, 71-81. VAN DER VOO, R. and T.H. TORSVIK (2004): The quality of the European Permo-Triassic paleopoles and its impact on Pangea reconstructions, in Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field (Am. Geophys. Un.), Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 145, 29-42. VAN DER VOO, R., F.J. MAUK and R.B. FRENCH (1976): Permian Triassic continental configurations and the origin of the Gulf of Mexico, Geology, 4, 177-180. VAN ZIJL, J.S.V., K.W.T. GRAHAM and A.L. HALES (1962): The palaeomagnetism of the Stormberg lavas of South Africa 1: evidence for a genuine reversal of the Earth’s field in Triassic-Jurassic times, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 7, 23-39. VIZÁN, H. and M.A.VAN ZELE (1995): Analysis of a lower Jurassic geomagnetic reversal based on a model that relates transitional fields to variations of flux on the core surface, Studia Geophys. Geod., 39, 177-188. WEGENER, A. (1922): Origin of Continents and Oceans, English translation of 3rd edition by J.G.A. SKERL (Methuen), pp. 1-212. ZONENSHAIN, L.P., M.I. KUZMIN and M.V. KONONOV (1985): Absolute reconstructions of the Paleozoic oceans, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 74, 103-116en
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorVizán, H.en
dc.contributor.authorVan Zele, M. A.en
dc.contributor.departmentConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentinaen
dc.contributor.departmentConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentinaen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.author.deptConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina-
crisitem.author.deptConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina-
Appears in Collections:Annals of Geophysics
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
05Vizán.pdf797.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

121
checked on Jan 28, 2023

Download(s) 50

294
checked on Jan 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check