Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2780
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallCifani, G.; CNR, ITC, L'Aquilaen
dc.contributor.authorallDi Capua, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione AC, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallLemme, A.; Regione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobassoen
dc.contributor.authorallMiozzi, C.; Regione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobassoen
dc.contributor.authorallPeppoloni, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallPodestà, S.; Università di Genova, DICAT, Genovaen
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-08T13:51:48Zen
dc.date.available2007-11-08T13:51:48Zen
dc.date.issued2007-06-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2780en
dc.description.abstractThe goal of our research has been to estimate the economic impact of the seismic hazard studies on the reconstruction phase after the 2002 Molise earthquake. The study has been carried out adopting the vulnerability model, connected to the GNDT II level form, on a sample of existing masonry buildings of Campobasso province. A procedure has been provided to recover the necessary parameters for the vulnerability evaluation, using the AeDES 05/2000 forms, which are the basic support for the safety assessment in the post-earthquake phases. Assuming a set of structural seismic upgrading intervantions, a correlation between the cost of ret-rofitting interventions and different limit state has been evaluated, taking into account the litologi-cal site characteristics, according to the recent studies of seismic microzonation of the earthquake epicentral area. The results show a substantial difference of the seismic upgrading costs, varying the hazard (PGA) and the litological site characteristics, particularly in the 1st and 2nd Zones of the Italian Seismic Classification (OPCM 3519/06). These considerations put in evidence once again the necessity to invest important economic re-sources in the building national heritage knowledge and in the seismic microzonation of the urban areas; only in this way an effective preventive planning of risk reduction can be perfomed.en
dc.language.isoItalianen
dc.relation.ispartofANIDIS 2007 - XII Convegno nazionale "L'Ingegneria sismica in Italia"en
dc.subjectanalisi dei costien
dc.subjectpericolosità sismicaen
dc.subjectvulnerabilità sismicaen
dc.subjectnormativa sismicaen
dc.titleSisma Molise 2002: pericolosità sismica e variazione dei costi di intervento per gli edifici danneggiati nella provincia di Campobassoen
dc.title.alternative2002 Molise Earthquake: seismic hazard and intervention cost change for buildings in Campobasso provinceen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.06. Surveys, measurements, and monitoringen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.description.ConferenceLocationPisa, Italiaen
dc.relation.referencesDr. Giuseppe Di Capua Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia giuseppe.dicapua@ingv.iten
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.1. Metodologie sismologiche per l'ingegneria sismicaen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.2. Scenari e mappe di pericolosità sismica e dannoen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorCifani, G.en
dc.contributor.authorDi Capua, G.en
dc.contributor.authorLemme, A.en
dc.contributor.authorMiozzi, C.en
dc.contributor.authorPeppoloni, S.en
dc.contributor.authorPodestà, S.en
dc.contributor.departmentCNR, ITC, L'Aquilaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione AC, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentRegione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobassoen
dc.contributor.departmentRegione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobassoen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Genova, DICAT, Genovaen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1it-
item.openairetypeConference paper-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.author.deptCNR, ITC, L'Aquila-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptUfficio del Commissario Delegato per le attività post sisma, Regione Molise-
crisitem.author.deptRegione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobasso-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoa,-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1254-3200-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2667-6506-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Conference materials
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ANIDIS_108_Cifani_et_al.pdfFull paper395.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

98
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Sep 28, 2020

Download(s) 50

209
checked on Sep 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check