Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2778
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallCompagnoni, M.; Politecnico di Milano, DIS, Milanoen
dc.contributor.authorallCurti, E.; Università di Genova, DICAT, Genovaen
dc.contributor.authorallDi Capua, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione AC, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallLemme, A.; Regione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobassoen
dc.contributor.authorallPeppoloni, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallPergalani, F.; Politecnico di Milano, DIS, Milanoen
dc.contributor.authorallPodestà, S.; Università di Genova, DICAT, Genovaen
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-08T12:47:43Zen
dc.date.available2007-11-08T12:47:43Zen
dc.date.issued2007-06-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2778en
dc.description.abstractAfter the 2002 Molise earthquake, a wide survey of the damage and the seismic vulnerability of the churches was carried out, using specific forms extensively tested and recently acknowledged at a national scale (G.U. 07/03/2006). This approach has allowed one to compare the observed and the expected medium damage, calculated through vulnerability curves correlated to the specific form used. This comparison has enabled to evaluate inhomogeneous values in some cases, pointing out how the surveyed damage could not be put down just to a structural lack of the building. Studying the sites morphology for the churches located on the ridges, it was observed a damage level always greater than expected. To study the influence of the local amplification phenomena due to the topography, it has been analyzed some churches damaged by the Appennino Abruzzese (1984) and Molise (2002) earthquakes. These churches are located on the ridges top, with slope in-clination alfa≥15°, height H≥30m and characterized by homogeneous lithological subsoil, almost to consider it having an elastic behavior under dynamical stress. Taking into account this hazard increase inside a vulnerability analyses (based on a macroseismic or a mechanical approach), it has been proposed a double approach, validated through local seismic response (RSL) modeling of the ground (estimation of amplification factors and of elastic response spectra) and through the seismic response of the macroelements, damaged by the reference earth-quake (linear and not-linear kinematic analysis). Through the vulnerability analysis based of the macroseismic approach, the influence of the site morphology on the building behavior has been preliminary defined by a vulnerability modifier (deltaVml), that represents an additional parameter to reach the equivalent value between the surveyed and the expected damage. The study of the amplification effects has been performed using the BEM numerical analysis; the results are represented by the amplification factors (Fa), defined as the ratio between the spectral intensity of output and input, considering the range period of 0.1s-0.5s, and the corresponding elas-tic response spectra: they confirm the results of the macroseismic approach. Considering the mechanical approach, two churches have been examined in detail (S Pietro in Vincoli at Castellino del Biferno and S. Michele Arcangelo at Campolieto): the kinematic analyses have been performed applied the calculated amplified and not-amplified response spectra (considering the earthquake 2002) and the design response spectrum. The analyses show that the results obtained applying the calculated amplified response spectrum are better correlated to the surveyed damage of the churches than the results obtained applying the not-amplified response spectrum.en
dc.language.isoItalianen
dc.relation.ispartofANIDIS 2007 - XII Convegno nazionale "L'Ingegneria sismica in Italia"en
dc.subjectanalisi di vulnerabilitàen
dc.subjectamplificazione sismicaen
dc.subjectpatrimonio monumentaleen
dc.subjectscenari di dannoen
dc.titleDanni al patrimonio monumentale ed effetti di amplificazione sismica per cause topograficheen
dc.title.alternativeMonumental heritage damage and seismic amplification effects due to the topographyen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.06. Surveys, measurements, and monitoringen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.description.ConferenceLocationPisa, Italiaen
dc.relation.referencesDr. Giuseppe Di Capua Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia giuseppe.dicapua@ingv.iten
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.1. Metodologie sismologiche per l'ingegneria sismicaen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorCompagnoni, M.en
dc.contributor.authorCurti, E.en
dc.contributor.authorDi Capua, G.en
dc.contributor.authorLemme, A.en
dc.contributor.authorPeppoloni, S.en
dc.contributor.authorPergalani, F.en
dc.contributor.authorPodestà, S.en
dc.contributor.departmentPolitecnico di Milano, DIS, Milanoen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Genova, DICAT, Genovaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione AC, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentRegione Molise, Struttura del Commissario Delegato per la Ricostruzione in Molise, Campobassoen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentPolitecnico di Milano, DIS, Milanoen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Genova, DICAT, Genovaen
item.openairetypeConference paper-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1it-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDIS-Politecnico di Milano-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Ingegneria delle Costruzioni, dell’Ambiente e del Territorio, Università degli Studi di Genova-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptUfficio del Commissario Delegato per le attività post sisma, Regione Molise-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDIS-Politecnico di Milano-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genoa,-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1254-3200-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2667-6506-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Conference materials
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ANIDIS_09_Compagnoni_et_al.pdfFull paper383.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

171
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Download(s) 10

649
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check