Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2526
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallBindi, D.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallLuzi, L.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallPacor, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallFranceschina, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallCastro, R. R.; Centro de Investigacio´n Cientı´fica y de Educacio´n Superior de Ensenada (CICESE)en
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T12:49:20Zen
dc.date.available2007-09-20T12:49:20Zen
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2526en
dc.description.abstractWe evaluate the goodness of fit of attenuation relations commonly used for the Italian national territory (Sabetta and Pugliese, 1996) by using the maximum likelihood approaches of Spudich et al. (1999) and Scherbaum et al. (2004). According to the classification scheme proposed by Scherbaum et al. (2004), the Sabetta and Pugliese (1996) relationships show consistent discrepancies between the predicted and the observed peak ground acceleration (PGA) at rock sites in the Umbria- Marche region, central Italy; however, at soft sites the agreement between observations and prediction is satisfactory. The bias of the residuals, computed with the Sabetta and Pugliese (1996) models for PGA, peak ground velocity, (PGV) and pseudovelocity response spectrum (PSV) (for Ml 4–6 and epicentral distances up to 100 km) is negative. This means that on the average, the predictions overestimate the observations, but the overestimation decreases with increasing magnitude. Then, we present regional predictive relations (UMA05) for maximum horizontal PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSV, derived from the strong-motion data recorded in the Umbria-Marche area and classified as to four site categories. The UMA05 attenuation relationships for rock sites are log10 (PGA) 2.487 0.534Ml 1.280 log10 (R2 3.942)0.5 0.268 log10 (PGV) 1.803 0.687Ml 1.150 log10 (R2 2.742)0.5 0.300 and log10 (PGA) 2.500 0.544Ml 1.284 log10 Rh 0.292 log10 (PGV) 1.752 0.685Ml 1.167 log10 Rh 0.297, where PGA is measured in fraction of g and PGV in centimeters per second, Ml is the local magnitude in the range 4–6, R is the epicentral distance in the range 1–100 km, and Rh is the hypocentral distance in kilometers. We used the random effect model (Brillinger and Priesler, 1985; Abrahamson and Youngs, 1992; Joyner and Boore, 1993; Joyner and Boore, 1994) to estimate the component of variance related to the earthquake-to-earthquake, station-to-station, and record-to-record variability, and to quantify the benefit of introducing a site classification in the attenuation model to reduce the variance. The introduction of the site classification in the attenuation model allows a reduction of the station-to-station component of variability (from 0.19 to 0.14 for PGA, and from 0.21 to 0.18 for PGV). We also found that the recordto- record component represents the largest contribution to the model uncertainty.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSeismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofBull. Seismol. Soc. Amer.en
dc.relation.ispartofseries3 / 96 (2006)en
dc.subjectGround-Motionen
dc.titleGround motion predictions from empirical attenuation relationships versus recorded data: the case of the 1997-98 Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) strong motion data-seten
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber984-1002en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120050102en
dc.relation.referencesAbrahamson, N. A., and R. R. Youngs (1992). A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 505–510. Ambraseys, N. N., J. Douglas, S. K. Sarma, and P. M. Smit (2005). Equations for estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 3, 1–53. Bommer, J. J., and F. Scherbaum (2005). Capturing and limiting groundmotion uncertainty in seismic hazard assessment, in Future Directions of Strong Motion Instrumentation, P. Gulkan and J. G. Anderson (Editors), Kluwer Academic, 25–40. Bommer, J. J., J. Douglas, and F. O. Strasser (2003). Style-of-faulting in ground motion prediction equations, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1, 171– 203. Bommer, J. J., F. Scherbaum, F. Cotton, H. Bungun, and F. Sabetta (2004). Discussion on “Uncertainty of strong-motion and seismic hazard” by R. Sigbjo¨rnsson and N. N. Ambraseys, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 2, 261– 267. Boore, D. M. (2003). Prediction of ground motion using the stochastic approach method, Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 635–676. Brillinger, D. R., and H. K. Preisler (1985). Further analysis of the Joyner- Boore attenuation data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 75, no. 2, 611–614. Brune, D. M. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4997–5009. Campbell, K. W. (2002). Strong-motion attenuation relations, in International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Vol. 81B, International Association of Seismology & Physics of the Earth’s Interior, Committee on Education, 1003–1012. Capuano, P., A. Zollo, A. Emolo, S. Marcucci, and G. Milana (2000). Rupture mechanism and source parameters of Umbria-Marche mainshocks from strong motion data, J. Seism. 4, 463–478. Castro, R. R., F. Pacor, D. Bindi, G. Franceschina, and L. Luzi (2004). Site response of strong motion stations in the Umbria region, central Italy, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 576–590. Cattaneo, M., P. Augliera, G. De Luca, A. Gorini, A. Govoni, S. Marcucci, A. Michelini, G. Monachesi, D. Spallarossa, and L. Trojani, and XGUMS (2000). The Umbria-Marche (Italy) earthquake sequence: analysis of the data recorede by the local and temporary networks, J. Seism. 4, 401–414. Chen, Y-H., and C.-C. P. Tsai (2002). A new method for estimation of the attenuation relationship with variance component, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1984–1991. Chiaraluce, L., A. Amato, M. Cocco, C. Chiarabba, G. Selvaggi, M. Di Bona, D. Piccinini, A. Deschamps, L. Margheriti, F. Courboulex, and M. Ripepe (2004). Complex normal faulting in the Apennines thrustand- fold belt: the 1997 seismic sequence in central Italy, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 99–116. Comite´ Europe´en de Normalisation (CEN) (2002). EN 1998, Eurocode 8, Design Provisions for the earthquake resistance of structures: seismic Actions and general requirements of structures, CEN/TC 250, Draft, May 2002. Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 58, 1583–1606. Deschamps, A., G. Iannaccone, and R. Scarpa (1984). The Umbrian earthquake (Italy) of 19 September 1979, Ann. Geophys. 2, 29–36. Douglas, J. (2003). Earthquake ground motion estimation using strongmotion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Sci. Rev. 61, 43–104. Douglas, J., and P. M. Smit (2001). How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1917–1923. Frisenda, M., M. Massa, D. Spallarossa, G. Ferretti, and C. Eva (2005). Attenuation relationship for low magnitude earthquakes using standard seismometric records. J. Earthquake Eng. 9, 23–40. Haessler, H., R. Gaulon, L. River, R. Console, M. Frogneaux, G. Gasparini, L. Martel, G. Patau, M. Siciliano, and A. Cisternas (1988). The Perugia (Italy) earthquake of 29 April 1984: a microearthquake survey. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 78, 1948–1964. Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica a Vulcanologia (INGV) (2004). INGV Seismic Bulletin, www.ingv.it/ roma/reti/rms/bolletino/. (last received March 2006). Joyner, W. B., and D. M. Boore (1993). Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 83, 469–487. Joyner, W. B., and D. M. Boore (1994). Errata: methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 955–956. Lay, T., and T. C. Wallace (1995). Modern Global Seismology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 521. Luzi, L., D. Bindi, G. Franceschina, F. Pacor, and R. R. Castro (2005). Geotechnical Site Characterisation in the Umbria Marche Area and Evaluation of Earthquake Site-Response. Pure Appl. Geoph. 162, 2133–2161. Morelli, A., G. Ekstro¨m, and M. Olivieri (2000). Source properties of the 1997–98 central Italy earthquake from inversion of long-period and broadband seismograms, J. Seism. 4, 365–375. Paige, C. C., and M. A. Saunders (1982). An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares, ACM Trans. Math. Software 8, 43–71. Rovelli, A., L. Scognamiglio, F. Marra, and A. Caserta (2001). Edgediffracted 1-sec surface waves observed in a small-size intramountain basin (Colfiorito, central Italy), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1851–1866. Sabetta, F., and A. Pugliese (1987). Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong-motion records, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1491–1511. Sabetta, F., and A. Pugliese (1996). Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 337–352. Scherbaum, F., F. Cotton, and P. Smit (2004). On the use of response spectral-reference data for the selection and ranking of ground-motion models for seismic-hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: the case of rock motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 2164–2185. Searle, S. R. (1971). Linear Models, Wiley, New York. Sigbjo¨rnsson, R., and N. N. Ambraseys (2003). Uncertainty of strongmotion and seismic hazard, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 1, 321–347. Spudich, P., W. B. Joyner, A. G. Lindh, D. M. Boore, B. M. Margaris, and J. B. Fletcher, (1999). SEA99: a revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1156–1170. Servizio Sismico Nazionale (SSN) Monitoring System Group (2002). The Strong Motion Records of the Umbria-Marche Sequence (September 1997–June 1998), CD-ROM.en
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorBindi, D.en
dc.contributor.authorLuzi, L.en
dc.contributor.authorPacor, F.en
dc.contributor.authorFranceschina, G.en
dc.contributor.authorCastro, R. R.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentCentro de Investigacio´n Cientı´fica y de Educacio´n Superior de Ensenada (CICESE)en
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptCICESE, División Ciencias de la Tierra, Departamento de Sismología, Ensenada, Baja California, México-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8619-2220-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4312-580X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5745-0414-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0990-4279-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
747.pdf528.92 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

46
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

165
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Download(s)

27
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric