Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2511
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallGulia, L.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallMeletti, C.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-19T11:52:27Zen
dc.date.available2007-09-19T11:52:27Zen
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2511en
dc.description.abstractIn any probabilistic seismic hazard assessment an important role is played by the seismicity rates. This is confirmed by the wide and controversial discussions about the procedures for their determination: Gutenberg and Richter distribution vs independent rates in every magnitude class ; size of binned magnitude class; the fitting algorithm to use (least squares or maximum likelihood); and so on. In 2004 a new probabilistic seismic hazard map of Italy, named MPS04 (MPS04 Working Group, 2004), was released adopting a logic tree approach for exploring the alternative epistemic choices (Fig. 1). For seismogenic zonation (ZS9, MPS04 Working Group, 2004) (Fig. 2) and catalogue (CPTI04; CPTI04 Working Group, 2004) no alternative models were explored.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofFirst European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismologyen
dc.subjectseismic hazard assessmenten
dc.titleThe influence of b-value estimate in seismic hazard assessmenten
dc.typePoster sessionen
dc.description.statusUnpublisheden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.description.ConferenceLocationGeneva, Switzerlanden
dc.relation.referencesIn any probabilistic seismic hazard assessment an important role is played by the seismicity rates. This is confirmed by the wide and controversial discussions about the procedures for their determination: Gutenberg and Richter distribution vs independent rates in every magnitude class ; size of binned magnitude class; the fitting algorithm to use (least squares or maximum likelihood); and so on. In 2004 a new probabilistic seismic hazard map of Italy, named MPS04 (MPS04 Working Group, 2004), was released adopting a logic tree approach for exploring the alternative epistemic choices (Fig. 1). For seismogenic zonation (ZS9, MPS04 Working Group, 2004) (Fig. 2) and catalogue (CPTI04; CPTI04 Working Group, 2004) no alternative models were explored.en
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorGulia, L.en
dc.contributor.authorMeletti, C.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
item.openairetypePoster session-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2571-8345-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Conference materials
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1040.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

123
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 5

1,110
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check