Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/1737
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallCrampin, S.; School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UK; also at Edinburgh Anisotropy Project, British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, Scotland UKen
dc.contributor.authorallZatsepin, S. V.; School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UKen
dc.contributor.authorallBrowitt, C. W. A.; School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UKen
dc.contributor.authorallKeilis-Borok, V. I.; International Institute of Earthquake Prediction and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; also at Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, California USAen
dc.contributor.authorallSuyehiro, K.; JAMSTEC, Yokosuka, Japanen
dc.contributor.authorallGao, Y.; Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, Chinaen
dc.contributor.authorallWalter, L.; Geospace Engineering Research International, Texas, USAen
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-28T11:48:26Zen
dc.date.available2006-09-28T11:48:26Zen
dc.date.issued2006-09-28T11:48:26Zen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/1737en
dc.descriptionPlease note that the figures are intended to be published in black and write (with no colour). It is particularly appropriate to publish this paper to Annals of Geophysics as the second Stress-Monitoring Site is scheduled to begin operation in SE Sicily as part of the SICIS Project.en
dc.description.abstractA new understanding of rock deformation allows the accumulation of stress before earthquakes to be monitored by using shear-wave splitting to assess stress-induced changes to microcrack geometry. Using swarms of small earthquakes as the source of shear-waves, such stress accumulations have been recognised with hindsight before some fifteen earthquakes worldwide. On one occasion the time, magnitude, and fault-break of an M 5 earthquake was successfully stress-forecast in a comparatively narrow magnitude/time window. However, suitable swarms of small earthquakes are very uncommon, and routine forecasting requires measurements of controlled-source observations at bore-hole Stress-Monitoring Sites (SMSs). A prototype SMS confirmed that both science and technology are effective for monitoring stress changes before earthquakes, and the sensitivity is such that a network of SMSs, on a 400 km-grid, say, could stress-forecast all M ≥ 5 earthquakes, that is all damaging earthquakes, within the grid. This paper suggests that a Global Earthquake Monitoring System (GEMS) could forecast all damaging earthquakes in both developing and developed countries worldwide.en
dc.format.extent2040832 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msworden
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.subjectforecasting damaging earthquakesen
dc.subjectGEMSen
dc.subjectGlobal network of Earthquake stress-Monitoring Sitesen
dc.subjectshear-wave splittingen
dc.subjectthe New Geophysicsen
dc.titleGEMS: the opportunity for stress-forecasting all damaging earthquakes worldwideen
dc.typemanuscripten
dc.description.statusSubmitteden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.relation.references*ANGERER, E., S. CRAMPIN, X.-Y. LI and T. L. DAVIS (2002): Processing, modelling, and predicting time-lapse effects of overpressured fluid-injection in a fractured reservoir, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 267-280. ASTER, R. C., P. M. SHEARER and J. BERGER, J (1991): Reply to CRAMPIN, S., D. C. BOOTH, R. EVANS, S. PEACOCK and J. B. FLETCHER, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 6415-6419. BOOTH, D. C., S. CRAMPIN, J. H. LOVELL and J.-M. CHIU (1990): Temporal changes in shear wave splitting during an earthquake swarm in Arkansas, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11,151-11,164. CHAPMAN, M., S. V. ZATSEPIN and S. CRAMPIN (1998): Anisotropic dispersion in stress-sensitive poroelasticity, 60th Conf. EAGE, Leipzig, Ext. Abst., 1, 10-10. CHAPMAN, M., S. V. ZATSEPIN and S. CRAMPIN (2000): Incorporating stress-sensitivity into dynamic poro-elasticity, 70th Ann. Mtg., SEG, Calgary, Exp. Abst., 2, 1536-1539. CRAMPIN, S. (1981): A review of wave motion in anisotropic and cracked elastic-media, Wave Motion, 3, 343-391. CRAMPIN, S. (1993): Arguments for EDA, Can. J. Expl. Geophys., 29, 18-30. *CRAMPIN, S. (1994): The fracture criticality of crustal rocks, Geophys. J. Int., 118, 428-438. CRAMPIN, S. (1997): Going APE: I - Modeling the inherent anisotropy of intact rock, 67th Ann. Mtg., SEG, Dallas, Exp. Abst., 1, 952-955; see also 956-959, 9 21-924. *CRAMPIN, S. (1999): Calculable fluid-rock interactions, J. Geol. Soc., 156, 501-514. *CRAMPIN, S. (2001): Developing stress-monitoring sites using cross-hole seismology to stress-forecast the times and magnitudes of future earthquakes, Tectonophysics, 338, 233-245. *CRAMPIN, S. (2003): The New Geophysics: shear-wave splitting provides a window into the crack-critical rock mass, Leading Edge, 22, 536-549. CRAMPIN, S. and D. C. BOOTH (1989): Shear-wave splitting showing hydraulic dilatation of pre-existing joints in granite, Sci. Drill., 1, 21-26. *CRAMPIN, S. and S. CHASTIN (2003): A review of shear-wave splitting in the crack-critical crust, Geophys. J. Int., 55, 221-240. *CRAMPIN, S. and Y. GAO (2005): Comment on "Systematic Analysis of Shear-Wave Splitting in the Aftershock Zone of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Shallow Crustal Anisotropy and Lack of Precursory Changes," by LIU, TENG, BEN-ZION, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 95, 354-360. *CRAMPIN, S. and S. PEACOCK (2005): A review of shear-wave splitting in the compliant crack-critical anisotropic Earth, Wave Motion, 41, 59-77. *CRAMPIN, S. and S. PEACOCK (2006a): A review of our current understanding of shear-wave splitting and common fallacies in interpretation, J. Seism., submitted. CRAMPIN, S. and S. PEACOCK (2006b): Stress-Monitoring Sites (SMSs) to aid mitigation of possible seismic hazard at the Three Gorges Dam, 12th Int. Workshop on Seismic Anisotropy, Beijing, Abstract. CRAMPIN, S., and S. V. ZATSEPIN (1997): Modelling the compliance of crustal rock: II - response to temporal changes before earthquakes, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 495-506. CRAMPIN, S., R. McGONIGLE, and M. ANDO (1986): Extensive-dilatancy anisotropy beneath Mount Hood, Oregon, and the effect of aspect ratio on seismic velocities through aligned cracks, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 12,703-12,710. CRAMPIN, S., D. C, BOOTH, R. EVANS, S. PEACOCK and J. B. FLETCHER (1990): Changes in shear wave splitting at Anza near the time of the North Palm Springs Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11,197-11,212; CRAMPIN, S., D. C, BOOTH, R. EVANS, S. PEACOCK and J. B. FLETCHER (1991): Comment on "Quantitative Measurements of Shear Wave Polarizations at the Anza Seismic Network, Southern California: Implications for shear wave splitting and earthquake prediction", by R. C. ASTER, P. M. SHEARER and J. BERGER, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 6403-6414. CRAMPIN, S., S. V. ZATSEPIN, C. SLATER and L. Y. BRODOV (1996): Abnormal shear-wave polarizations as indicators of pressures and over pressures, 58th Conf. EAGE, Amsterdam, Ext. Abst., O38. CRAMPIN, S., H. J. ROWLANDS, S. V. ZATSEPIN, B. J. SMART, K. EDLMANN and B. CRAWFORD (1997): Predicting the response to effective stress of cores with different pore fluids, 59th Conf. EAGE, Geneva, Ext. Abst., 2, CO22. CRAMPIN, S., T. VOLTI and R. STEFÁNSSON (1999a): A successfully stress-forecast earthquake, Geophys. J. Int., 138, F1-F5. CRAMPIN, S., S. V. ZATSEPIN, H. J. ROWLANDS, B. J. SMART and J. M. SOMERVILLE, J. (1999b): APE-modelling of fluid/rock deformation of sandstone cores in laboratory stress-cells, 61th Conf. EAGE, Helsinki, Ext. Abst., 1, 2-08. CRAMPIN, S., T. VOLTI, S. CHASTIN and A. GUDMUNDSSON (2002): Indication of high pore-fluid pressures in a seismically-active fault zone, Geophys. J. Int., 151, F1-F5. CRAMPIN, S., S. CHASTIN and Y. GAO (2003.): Shear-wave splitting in a critical crust: III - preliminary report of multi-variable measurements in active tectonics, J. Appl. Geophys., 54, 265-277. CRAMPIN, S., S. PEACOCK, Y. GAO and S. CHASTIN (2004): The scatter of time-delays in shear-wave splitting above small earthquakes, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 39-44. DAVIS, T. L., R. D. BENSON, S. L. ROCHE and D. TALLEY (1997): 4-D 3-C seismology and dynamic reservoir characterization - a geophysical renaissance, 67th Ann. Mtg., SEG, Dallas, Exp. Abst., 1, 880-882; see also 883-885, 886-889. FRANKEL, A. D. (2003): Comment of 'Should Memphis build on California's earthquakes', by S., STEIN, J. TOMASELLO, A. NEWMAN, and Reply, EOS, 84, 29, 271-273. GAO, Y. and S. CRAMPIN (2004): Observations of stress relaxation before earthquakes, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 578-582. *GAO, Y. and S. CRAMPIN (2006): A further stress-forecast earthquake (with hindsight), where migration of source earthquakes causes anomalies in shear-wave polarisations, Tectonophysics, in press. GAO, Y., P. WANG, S. ZHENG, M. WANG and Y.-T. CHEN (1998): Temporal changes in shear-wave splitting at an isolated swarm of small earthquakes in 1992 near Dongfang, Hainan Island, Southern China, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 102-112. HEFFER, K. J. and T. G. BEVAN (1990): Scaling relationships in natural fractures, Soc. Pet. Eng., Paper 20981. JENSEN H. J. (1998): Self-organized criticality, Cambridge Univ. Press. KING, M. S., N. A. CHAUDHRY and S. AHMED (1994): Experimental ultrasonic velocities and permeability of sandstones with aligned cracks, 61th Conf. EAGE, Vienna, Ext. Abst., P113. LIU, Y., S. CRAMPIN and I. MAIN (1997): Shear-wave anisotropy: spatial and temporal variations in time delays at Parkfield, Central California, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 771-785. PEACOCK, S., S. CRAMPIN, D. C. BOOTH and J. B. FLETCHER (1988): Shear-wave splitting in the Anza seismic gap, Southern California: temporal variations as possible precursors. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 3339-3356. RALEIGH, C. B., J. D. HEALY and J. D. BREDEHOEFT (1976): An experiment in earthquake control of Rangely, Colorado, Science, 191, 1230-1237. SOTHCOTT, J., O'HARA, S. G., KHAZANEHDARI, J. AND MCCANN, C., 2000a. From sonic to ultrasonic - the acoustic properties of reservoir sandstones. 61th Conf. EAGE, Glasgow, Ext. Abst., D-39. SOTHCOTT, J., C. McCANN and S. G. O'HARA (2000b): The influence of two different pore fluids on the acoustic properties of reservoir sandstones at sonic and ultrasonic frequencies, 70th Ann. Mtg., SEG, Calgary, Exp. Abst., 2, 1883-1886. STEIN, S., J. TOMASELLO and A. NEWMAN (2003): Should Memphis build on California's earthquakes, EOS, 84, 29, 177 & 184-185. SUYEHIRO, K. (2002): Illuminating Earth's mantle and core: a new challenge for ODO, in ed. BECKER, K., Achievements and opportunities of Scientific Ocean Drilling, Joides J., Spec. Issue, 28, 55-60. *VOLTI, T. and S. CRAMPIN (2003a): A four-year study of shear-wave splitting in Iceland: 1. Background and preliminary analysis, in New insights into structural interpretation and modelling, ed. NIEUWLAND, D. A., Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ., 212, 117-133. *VOLTI, T. and CRAMPIN (2003b): A four-year study of shear-wave splitting in Iceland: 2. Temporal changes before earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, in New insights into structural interpretation and modelling, ed. NIEUWLAND, D. A., Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ., 212, 135-149. *WU, J., Y. GAO, S. CRAMPIN, T. VOLTI, T. and Y.-T. CHEN (2006): Smaller source earthquakes and improved measuring techniques allow the largest earthquakes in Iceland to be stress-forecast (with hindsight), Geophys. J. Int., 166, 1293-1298. ZATSEPIN, S. V. and S. CRAMPIN (1996). Stress-induced coupling between anisotropic permeability and shear-wave splitting, 58th Conf. EAGE, Amsterdam, Ext. Abst., C030. ZATSEPIN, S. V. and S. CRAMPIN (1997): Modelling the compliance of crustal rock: I - response of shear-wave splitting to differential stress, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 477-494. *Paper/preprint available at http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/scrampin/opinion/.en
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorCrampin, S.en
dc.contributor.authorZatsepin, S. V.en
dc.contributor.authorBrowitt, C. W. A.en
dc.contributor.authorKeilis-Borok, V. I.en
dc.contributor.authorSuyehiro, K.en
dc.contributor.authorGao, Y.en
dc.contributor.authorWalter, L.en
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UK; also at Edinburgh Anisotropy Project, British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, Scotland UKen
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UKen
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UKen
dc.contributor.departmentInternational Institute of Earthquake Prediction and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; also at Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, California USAen
dc.contributor.departmentJAMSTEC, Yokosuka, Japanen
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, Chinaen
dc.contributor.departmentGeospace Engineering Research International, Texas, USAen
item.openairetypemanuscript-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UK; also at Edinburgh Anisotropy Project, British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, Scotland UK-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UK-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland UK-
crisitem.author.deptInternational Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia-
crisitem.author.deptJAMSTEC, Yokosuka, Japan-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China-
crisitem.author.deptGeospace Engineering Research International, Texas, USA-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
Appears in Collections:Manuscripts
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
GEMS AGh.doc1.99 MBMicrosoft Word
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

166
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

10
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check